Suppr超能文献

餐具的选择会影响食物的供应量。

Serving bowl selection biases the amount of food served.

机构信息

Marketing and Consumer Behaviour Group, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Nutr Educ Behav. 2012 Jan-Feb;44(1):66-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2011.03.001. Epub 2011 Oct 6.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine how common serving bowls containing food for multiple persons influence serving behavior and consumption and whether they do so independently of satiation and food evaluation.

METHODS

In this between-subjects experiment, 68 participants were randomly assigned to either a group serving pasta from a large-sized bowl (6.9-L capacity) or a medium-sized bowl (3.8-L capacity).

RESULTS

Analysis of covariance showed that when given a large-sized bowl, diners served 77% more pasta (364.0 vs. 205.5 g; P < .01) and felt more satiated (P = .03) compared with diners given a medium-sized bowl, even though the food was not rated tastier or otherwise notable (all P > .32).

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

In contrast to those in studies involving larger-sized plates and spoons, people serving from larger bowls felt more satiated. These findings again highlight the role that external cues play in food consumption and show the importance of considering serving bowl size in nutrition education.

摘要

目的

确定盛放多人份食物的公用碗会如何影响供餐行为和食物摄入量,以及这种影响是否独立于饱腹感和食物评价。

方法

在这项基于被试者的实验中,68 名参与者被随机分配到使用大容量碗(6.9 升)或中号碗(3.8 升)盛放大份意大利面的组。

结果

协方差分析显示,与使用中号碗的被试者相比,使用大容量碗的被试者供应的意大利面多 77%(364.0 克比 205.5 克;P <.01),且感到更饱(P =.03),尽管食物的味道或其他方面没有被评价为更好(所有 P >.32)。

结论和意义

与涉及更大尺寸盘子和勺子的研究结果不同,使用大碗盛食物的人感到更饱。这些发现再次强调了外部线索在食物摄入中的作用,并表明在营养教育中考虑盛饭容器大小的重要性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验