Suppr超能文献

通过时间和概率提示空间注意。

Cueing spatial attention through timing and probability.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Rome 'La Sapienza', Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Cortex. 2013 Jan;49(1):211-21. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2011.08.010. Epub 2011 Sep 6.

Abstract

Even when focused on an effortful task we retain the ability to detect salient environmental information, and even irrelevant visual stimuli can be automatically detected. However, to which extent unattended information affects attentional control is not fully understood. Here we provide evidences of how the brain spontaneously organizes its cognitive resources by shifting attention between a selective-attending and a stimulus-driven modality within a single task. Using a spatial cueing paradigm we investigated the effect of cue-target asynchronies as a function of their probabilities of occurrence (i.e., relative frequency). Results show that this accessory information modulates attentional shifts. A valid spatial cue improved participants' performance as compared to an invalid one only in trials in which target onset was highly predictable because of its more robust occurrence. Conversely, cuing proved ineffective when spatial cue and target were associated according to a less frequent asynchrony. These patterns of response depended on asynchronies' probability and not on their duration. Our findings clearly demonstrate that through a fine decision-making, performed trial-by-trial, the brain utilizes implicit information to decide whether or not voluntarily shifting spatial attention. As if according to a cost-planning strategy, the cognitive effort of shifting attention depending on the cue is performed only when the expected advantages are higher. In a trade-off competition for cognitive resources, voluntary/automatic attending may thus be a more complex process than expected.

摘要

即使在专注于一项费力的任务时,我们也能保持检测突出环境信息的能力,即使是不相关的视觉刺激也可以自动检测到。然而,未被注意的信息在多大程度上影响注意力控制还不完全清楚。在这里,我们提供了证据,说明大脑如何通过在单个任务中在选择性注意和刺激驱动模式之间转移注意力来自发组织认知资源。使用空间提示范式,我们研究了提示-目标时滞作为其出现概率(即相对频率)的函数的影响。结果表明,这种辅助信息调节了注意力转移。与无效提示相比,有效空间提示仅在目标起始高度可预测的情况下(由于其更稳健的出现)才能提高参与者的表现。相反,当空间提示和目标根据不太频繁的时滞相关联时,提示证明是无效的。这些反应模式取决于时滞的概率,而不是它们的持续时间。我们的研究结果清楚地表明,大脑通过逐次进行精细的决策,利用隐含信息来决定是否自愿转移空间注意力。就像根据成本规划策略一样,只有在预期优势更高的情况下,才会根据提示来执行注意力转移的认知努力。在认知资源的权衡竞争中,自愿/自动注意可能比预期的更复杂。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验