Lee Jae Hyuk, Kim Kyuseok, Jo You Hwan, Rhee Joong Eui, Lee Jung Chan, Kim Kyung Su, Kwon Woon Yong, Suh Gil Joon, Kim Hee Chan, Yoon Ho Il, Park Sang Heon
Department of Emergency Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Gyeonggi-do, Korea.
J Emerg Med. 2012 Aug;43(2):251-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2011.06.037. Epub 2011 Oct 7.
Glucose control is important in the management of critically ill patients. However, strict glucose control requires a large amount of nursing resources, especially in overcrowded emergency departments (EDs).
A continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS) may be beneficial for glucose control in the ED. The objective of this study was to determine the test characteristics of CGMS in critically ill ED patients.
A prospective observational study of critically ill ED patients was conducted. During a patient's visit to the ED, a CGMS sensor measured their interstitial fluid glucose levels continuously. Capillary glucose was measured every hour and used for glucose control and as a reference value. CGMS values were recorded in real time and compared with capillary glucose values.
A total of 122 pairs of capillary and CGMS glucose values in 12 patients were analyzed. The correlation coefficient was 0.87, and Bland-Altman analysis showed that 117 pairs (95.9%) were within a 95% confidence interval. A Clarke Error Grid Analysis indicated an overall accuracy of 96.8% (Zones A and B). However, the mean absolute relative difference (MARD) was significantly higher in the hypoglycemic range than in a normo- or hyperglycemic range (p = 0.001). The sensitivity and positive predictive value of CGMS for detecting hypoglycemia were 33.3% and 16.7%, respectively. The CGMS specificity and negative predictive value were 95.8% and 98.3%, respectively. There was no linear correlation between MARD and body mass index, axillary temperature, inotrope score, and base deficit (all p-value >0.05).
CGMS demonstrated good clinical accuracy by Clarke Error Grid Analysis. There also was high agreement between CGMS and capillary glucose levels. However, CGMS demonstrated only limited real-time hypoglycemia detection ability in critically ill ED patients.
血糖控制在危重症患者的管理中至关重要。然而,严格的血糖控制需要大量护理资源,尤其是在人满为患的急诊科(ED)。
连续血糖监测系统(CGMS)可能有助于急诊科的血糖控制。本研究的目的是确定CGMS在危重症急诊科患者中的检测特性。
对危重症急诊科患者进行前瞻性观察研究。在患者就诊急诊科期间,CGMS传感器持续测量其组织间液葡萄糖水平。每小时测量一次毛细血管血糖,并用于血糖控制及作为参考值。实时记录CGMS值并与毛细血管血糖值进行比较。
共分析了12例患者的122对毛细血管和CGMS血糖值。相关系数为0.87,Bland-Altman分析显示117对(95.9%)在95%置信区间内。Clarke误差网格分析表明总体准确率为96.8%(A区和B区)。然而,低血糖范围内的平均绝对相对差异(MARD)显著高于正常血糖或高血糖范围(p = 0.001)。CGMS检测低血糖的敏感性和阳性预测值分别为33.3%和16.7%。CGMS的特异性和阴性预测值分别为95.8%和98.3%。MARD与体重指数、腋窝温度、血管活性药物评分及碱缺失之间均无线性相关性(所有p值>0.05)。
通过Clarke误差网格分析,CGMS显示出良好的临床准确性。CGMS与毛细血管血糖水平之间也具有高度一致性。然而,在危重症急诊科患者中,CGMS的实时低血糖检测能力有限。