Department of Radiology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Miyamae, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, Japan.
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2011 Dec;22(12):1721-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2011.08.021. Epub 2011 Oct 8.
To evaluate the efficacy of cement injection under vacuum aspiration (CIVAS) of cleft contents in percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures with an intravertebral cleft.
From April 2008 to October 2010, vertebroplasty for single-level osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures with clefts was performed in 34 patients (seven women, 27 men; mean age, 77 y) with CIVAS and in 41 patients (three women, 38 men; mean age, 77 y) by conventional injection (control group). In this retrospective study, the cement volume, cement ratio, visual analog scale (VAS) pain score, and incidences of leakage, new vertebral compression fracture, and nonhealing were compared between groups. Vertebral height changes in the CIVAS group were also evaluated.
There were significant decreases in VAS scores in both groups (P < .001). There were no significant differences in complications between groups (cement leakage, P = .70; new vertebral compression fracture, P = .17; nonhealing, P = .086). Vertebral height was significantly decreased by vacuum aspiration and increased by cement injection (P < .001). The mean cement volume was significantly higher (P = .0057) in the CIVAS group (4.87 mL) than in the control group (3.58 mL). Cement filling was achieved more sufficiently in the CIVAS group (P = .014).
The CIVAS method is feasible and appears to improve cleft filling in the treatment of single-level vertebral compression fractures with a cleft, compared with conventional cement injection.
评估在伴有椎体内裂隙的骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折经皮椎体成形术中应用真空抽吸下(CIVAS)向裂隙内注骨水泥的疗效。
2008 年 4 月至 2010 年 10 月,对 34 例(7 例女性,27 例男性;平均年龄 77 岁)单节段伴裂隙的骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折患者行 CIVAS 椎体成形术(CIVAS 组),同期对 41 例(3 例女性,38 例男性;平均年龄 77 岁)患者行常规注射(对照组)。在这项回顾性研究中,比较了两组间的骨水泥体积、骨水泥比率、视觉模拟评分(VAS)疼痛评分以及渗漏、新发椎体压缩骨折和不愈合的发生率。还评估了 CIVAS 组的椎体高度变化。
两组的 VAS 评分均显著降低(P <.001)。两组并发症无显著差异(骨水泥渗漏:P =.70;新发椎体压缩骨折:P =.17;不愈合:P =.086)。真空抽吸可显著降低椎体高度,而骨水泥注射可显著增加椎体高度(P <.001)。CIVAS 组的平均骨水泥体积明显高于对照组(4.87 mL 比 3.58 mL,P =.0057)。CIVAS 组的骨水泥填充更充分(P =.014)。
与常规骨水泥注射相比,CIVAS 方法在治疗伴裂隙的单节段椎体压缩骨折中是可行的,且似乎可改善裂隙填充。