Daly M, Wilson M
Department of Psychology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
J Pers. 1990 Mar;58(1):163-89. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1990.tb00912.x.
Freud's Oedipal theory sees parent-offspring conflict as a within-gender rivalry, whereas most modern evolutionary models interpret it as a gender-blind disagreement about resource allocation. New analyses of family homicides and a critical review of prior evidence do not support the central Freudian claim of a same-sex contingency in parent-offspring antagonism during the Oedipal phase. Several errors of fact and interpretation in psychoanalytic theorizing about family relations are discussed. We argue that psychoanalysts mistake substantive conflicts between nonrelatives for symbolic manifestations of family conflicts.
弗洛伊德的俄狄浦斯理论将亲子冲突视为同性之间的竞争,而大多数现代进化模型则将其解释为关于资源分配的无性别差异的分歧。对家庭凶杀案的新分析以及对先前证据的批判性回顾并不支持弗洛伊德关于俄狄浦斯阶段亲子对抗中存在同性偶然性的核心主张。本文讨论了精神分析理论在家庭关系方面存在的几个事实和解释错误。我们认为,精神分析师将非亲属之间的实质性冲突误认为是家庭冲突的象征性表现。