• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

氧化锆基和金属陶瓷种植体支持的单冠的存活率和崩瓷情况。

Survival and chipping of zirconia-based and metal-ceramic implant-supported single crowns.

机构信息

Department of Prosthodontics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.

出版信息

Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012 May;14 Suppl 1:e119-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00388.x. Epub 2011 Oct 10.

DOI:10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00388.x
PMID:21985745
Abstract

PURPOSE

The objective of this retrospective study was to compare the incidence of chipping of implant-supported, all-ceramic, and metal-ceramic single crowns.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

One hundred fifty-three patients (51.7% male, mean age 55.0 years) received 232 cemented implant-supported single crowns. One hundred and seventy-nine crowns had a metal framework (gold alloy) and 53 crowns were all-ceramic (zirconia framework and glass-ceramic veneer material). Age, gender, kind of cementation, and location of the restorations were assessed as possible factors affecting chipping.

RESULTS

During the observation period of up to 5.8 years (mean 2.1 years; standard deviation 1.4), a total of 13 (24.5%) all-ceramic and 17 (9.5%) metal-ceramic crowns suffered from chipping, a difference that was statistically significant. A total of ten single crowns had to be remade resulting in survival of 86.8% (all-ceramic) and 98.3% (metal-ceramic). The other possible factors did not have a significant effect on the chipping.

CONCLUSION

Chipping was found to be more frequent for all-ceramic implant-supported single crowns. If the reasons for the vulnerability of all-ceramic crowns remain unknown, implants with all-ceramic single crowns should generally be recommended with care.

摘要

目的

本回顾性研究的目的是比较种植体支持的全瓷和金属陶瓷单冠的崩瓷发生率。

材料与方法

153 名患者(51.7%为男性,平均年龄 55.0 岁)接受了 232 个粘结固位的种植体支持的单冠修复。179 个冠有金属基底(金合金),53 个冠为全瓷(氧化锆基底和玻璃陶瓷贴面材料)。评估年龄、性别、粘结类型和修复体位置等因素是否为影响崩瓷的可能因素。

结果

在最长 5.8 年(平均 2.1 年;标准差 1.4)的观察期内,共有 13 个(24.5%)全瓷冠和 17 个(9.5%)金属陶瓷冠发生崩瓷,差异具有统计学意义。共有 10 个单冠需要重新制作,全瓷冠的存活率为 86.8%(全瓷冠)和 98.3%(金属陶瓷冠)。其他可能的因素对崩瓷没有显著影响。

结论

全瓷种植体支持的单冠崩瓷发生率更高。如果全瓷冠易损的原因仍不清楚,一般应谨慎推荐使用全瓷单冠种植体。

相似文献

1
Survival and chipping of zirconia-based and metal-ceramic implant-supported single crowns.氧化锆基和金属陶瓷种植体支持的单冠的存活率和崩瓷情况。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012 May;14 Suppl 1:e119-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00388.x. Epub 2011 Oct 10.
2
Short-term complications of implant-supported and combined tooth-implant-supported fixed dental prostheses.种植体支持和联合牙种植体支持固定义齿的短期并发症。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013 Jul;24(7):758-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02482.x. Epub 2012 May 9.
3
Retrospective comparison of semipermanent and permanent cementation of implant-supported single crowns and FDPs with regard to the incidence of survival and complications.回顾性比较种植体支持的单冠和 FDP 采用半永久性和永久性黏结对存活率和并发症发生率的影响。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012 May;14 Suppl 1:e151-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00396.x. Epub 2011 Nov 14.
4
Influence of the veneer-framework interface on the mechanical behavior of ceramic veneers: a nonlinear finite element analysis.饰面-支架界面陶瓷饰面力学行为的影响:非线性有限元分析。
J Prosthet Dent. 2014 Oct;112(4):857-63. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.01.022. Epub 2014 Apr 12.
5
Zirconium dioxide based dental restorations. Studies on clinical performance and fracture behaviour.基于二氧化锆的牙科修复体。临床性能和断裂行为的研究。
Swed Dent J Suppl. 2011(213):9-84.
6
Evaluation of zirconium-oxide-based ceramic single-unit posterior fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) generated with two CAD/CAM systems compared to porcelain-fused-to-metal single-unit posterior FDPs: a 5-year clinical prospective study.两种 CAD/CAM 系统制作氧化锆基陶瓷单单位后固定义齿(FDPs)与金属烤瓷熔附单单位后 FDPs 的比较:一项为期 5 年的临床前瞻性研究。
J Prosthodont. 2012 Jun;21(4):265-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2011.00825.x. Epub 2012 Feb 19.
7
Retrievable metal ceramic implant-supported fixed prostheses with milled titanium frameworks and all-ceramic crowns: retrospective clinical study with up to 10 years of follow-up.可摘金属陶瓷种植体支持固定修复体,采用铣削钛金属基底桥架和全瓷冠:最长达 10 年的回顾性临床研究。
J Prosthodont. 2012 Jun;21(4):256-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2011.00824.x. Epub 2012 Feb 19.
8
Zirconia abutments for single-tooth implant restorations: a retrospective and clinical follow-up study.氧化锆基台用于单颗牙种植修复:回顾性临床随访研究。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011 Nov;22(11):1308-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02114.x. Epub 2011 Mar 8.
9
A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of zirconia-ceramic and metal-ceramic single crowns.氧化锆陶瓷-陶瓷和金属-陶瓷单冠的存活率和并发症发生率的系统评价。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Oct;29 Suppl 16:199-214. doi: 10.1111/clr.13306.
10
Fracture mode during cyclic loading of implant-supported single-tooth restorations.种植体支持的单牙修复体在循环加载下的断裂模式。
J Prosthet Dent. 2012 Aug;108(2):74-83. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(12)60110-3.

引用本文的文献

1
FEA Comparison of the Mechanical Behavior of Three Dental Crown Materials: Enamel, Ceramic, and Zirconia.三种牙冠材料(牙釉质、陶瓷和氧化锆)力学行为的有限元分析比较
Materials (Basel). 2024 Jan 30;17(3):673. doi: 10.3390/ma17030673.
2
Evaluation and Comparison of Five-Year Survival of Tooth-Supported Porcelain Fused to Metal and All-Ceramic Multiple Unit Fixed Prostheses: A Systematic Review.牙支持式烤瓷熔附金属全冠与全瓷多单位固定义齿五年生存率的评估与比较:一项系统评价
Cureus. 2022 Oct 15;14(10):e30338. doi: 10.7759/cureus.30338. eCollection 2022 Oct.
3
Cemented versus screw-retained zirconia-based single-implant restorations: 5-year results of a randomized controlled clinical trial.
水泥固位与螺钉固位氧化锆基单颗种植体修复体:一项随机对照临床试验的 5 年结果。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2022 Apr;33(4):353-361. doi: 10.1111/clr.13895. Epub 2022 Feb 2.
4
Esthetic, mechanical, and biological outcomes of various implant abutments for single-tooth replacement in the anterior region: a systematic review of the literature.在前牙区单颗牙缺失修复中,各种种植体基台的美观、力学和生物学效果:文献系统评价。
Int J Implant Dent. 2021 Sep 8;7(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s40729-021-00370-7.
5
Retention and Clinical Performance of Zirconia Crowns: A Comprehensive Review.氧化锆全冠的固位与临床性能:一项综述
Int J Dent. 2020 Oct 15;2020:8846534. doi: 10.1155/2020/8846534. eCollection 2020.
6
Dental Implants with Different Neck Design: A Prospective Clinical Comparative Study with 2-Year Follow-Up.不同颈部设计的牙种植体:一项为期2年随访的前瞻性临床对比研究。
Materials (Basel). 2020 Feb 25;13(5):1029. doi: 10.3390/ma13051029.
7
Clinical performance of tooth- or implant-supported veneered zirconia single crowns: 42-month results.牙或种植体支持的贴面氧化锆单冠的临床性能:42 个月的结果。
Clin Oral Investig. 2019 Dec;23(12):4301-4309. doi: 10.1007/s00784-019-02878-0. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
8
Mechanical performance of cement- and screw-retained all-ceramic single crowns on dental implants.种植体上水泥和螺钉固位全瓷单冠的机械性能。
Clin Oral Investig. 2018 Mar;22(2):981-991. doi: 10.1007/s00784-017-2178-z. Epub 2017 Jul 15.
9
The effect of different cooling rates and coping thicknesses on the failure load of zirconia-ceramic crowns after fatigue loading.不同冷却速率和基底厚度对疲劳加载后氧化锆陶瓷冠失效载荷的影响。
J Adv Prosthodont. 2017 Jun;9(3):152-158. doi: 10.4047/jap.2017.9.3.152. Epub 2017 Jun 19.
10
Clinical performance of screw-retained and cemented implant-supported zirconia single crowns: 36-month results.螺钉固位和粘结剂固位的氧化锆种植体支持单冠的临床性能:36 个月的结果。
Clin Oral Investig. 2017 Jul;21(6):1953-1959. doi: 10.1007/s00784-016-1982-1. Epub 2016 Oct 29.