School of Education, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan 52900, Israel.
Res Dev Disabil. 2011 Nov-Dec;32(6):2045-54. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2011.08.012. Epub 2011 Sep 13.
The primary goal of the current study was to examine the ability of children with autism (ASD) and children with learning disabilities (LD) to improve their metaphoric competence by an intervention program using "thinking maps". Twenty ASD children, 20 LD, and 20 typically developed (TD) children were tested on metaphors and idioms comprehension tests, homophone meaning generation test, and fluency tests. Both ASD and LD groups performed poorly compared with TD on all tests, with the LD group outperformed the ASD group in the executive function tests. The results indicate that the LD group was able to use the "thinking maps" to understand metaphors that were encountered for the first time more efficiently than the ASD group. Furthermore, in the autistic group the homophone meaning generation test, associated with mental flexibility mechanism, correlated with novel metaphors understanding, which do not rely on prior knowledge. In the learning disabilities group, conventional metaphors understanding correlated with the homophone meaning generation test.
本研究的主要目的是通过使用“思维地图”的干预计划,考察自闭症(ASD)儿童和学习障碍(LD)儿童提高隐喻能力的能力。对 20 名 ASD 儿童、20 名 LD 儿童和 20 名典型发育(TD)儿童进行了隐喻和习语理解测试、同音字意义生成测试和流畅性测试。所有测试中,ASD 组和 LD 组的表现均明显不如 TD 组,而执行功能测试中,LD 组的表现优于 ASD 组。结果表明,LD 组能够更有效地使用“思维地图”来理解首次遇到的隐喻,而 ASD 组则不能。此外,在自闭症组中,与心理灵活性机制相关的同音字意义生成测试与不依赖于先验知识的新隐喻理解相关。在学习障碍组中,传统隐喻理解与同音字意义生成测试相关。