Futures Group International, Washington, DC, USA.
Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2011 Sep;37(3):125-33. doi: 10.1363/3712511.
National family planning programs in the developing world vary greatly in strength and coverage, and in the nature of their outreach. Periodic measures of their types and levels of effort have been conducted since 1972.
In 2009, expert observers in 81 developing countries completed a questionnaire that assessed 31 features of family planning program effort, as well as other program measures. Data were compared with those from similar surveys fielded in 1999 and 2004 to examine trends over the decade.
On average, national family planning programs improved their effort levels slightly from 1999 to 2004, and again from 2004 to 2009. The average effort in 2009, however, was only about half of maximum; component scores for service measures and for measures of access to contraception did not reach 50% of maximum in 2009. Differences by region and by effort quartile emerged in subgroup analyses. Overall, improvement of women's health and avoidance of unwanted births were the most important program justifications, ranking higher than fertility reduction, economic development or reduction of childbearing among unmarried adolescents. The subgroups given the most emphasis were poor and rural populations, while unmarried youth and postabortion women received the least. Among external influences, changes in donor and domestic funding were seen as more unfavorable than the merging of family planning programs into broader health services.
Average program effort levels have been sustained, although deficiencies remain. Countries have not yet ensured universal access to a variety of contraceptive choices, through various channels, for both short- and long-term methods.
发展中国家的国家计划生育项目在力度和覆盖范围以及推广性质上存在很大差异。自 1972 年以来,一直定期对其类型和努力程度进行衡量。
2009 年,81 个发展中国家的专家观察员完成了一份问卷,评估了计划生育项目努力的 31 个特征,以及其他项目措施。将数据与 1999 年和 2004 年进行的类似调查数据进行比较,以考察过去十年的趋势。
平均而言,国家计划生育项目从 1999 年到 2004 年略有提高其努力水平,从 2004 年到 2009 年再次提高。然而,2009 年的平均努力水平仅略高于最高水平的一半;服务措施和获得避孕措施的衡量指标在 2009 年也没有达到最高水平的 50%。在亚组分析中出现了按地区和努力四分位数划分的差异。总体而言,改善妇女健康和避免意外怀孕是项目最重要的理由,比降低生育率、经济发展或减少未婚青少年生育更重要。给予最重视的亚组是贫困和农村人口,而未婚青年和堕胎后妇女则得到的关注最少。在外部影响方面,捐助方和国内资金的变化被视为比将计划生育项目纳入更广泛的卫生服务更不利。
尽管存在缺陷,但平均项目努力水平已得到维持。各国尚未确保通过各种渠道,为短期和长期方法,为所有人提供各种避孕选择的普遍获得。