Demographic consultant.
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2015 Sep 7;3(3):419-45. doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-15-00124.
While several indicators for reproductive health have improved for entire populations, few analyses are available for trends over time in the gaps between the poor and the rich. This paper tracks improvements in the equitable distribution of reproductive health indicators according to wealth quintiles, especially for contraceptive use, in 46 low- and middle-income countries based on national population-based surveys conducted between 1990 and 2013. It focuses on the gaps between the poorest and richest quintiles in the earliest and latest survey rounds across a number of reproductive health indicators related to family planning, fertility desires, antenatal care, and infant and child mortality, as well as on improvements in the absolute levels of contraceptive use by the poorest quintile. Gap changes were decomposed to show how the gaps can either diminish or grow due to either the bottom or top quintile, or both. In addition, bivariate correlation analysis was conducted to examine the relationship of the gaps, and of contraceptive use by the poor, to national family planning program efforts. Overall, the gaps between the poorest and richest have narrowed, due primarily to faster improvements among the poor than the rich. For example, the gap between the richest and poorest in the modern contraceptive prevalence rate has declined by 25%, from a 20.4 percentage point difference to a 15.4 point difference. And the gap has decreased more where family planning programs have been stronger. Across most of 18 other reproductive health indicators, the gaps have also been narrowing. For instance, the poor-rich gap for antenatal care decreased by over a third, from a difference of 30.7 percentage points to 19.6 percentage points. Gaps in infant and child mortality also have declined by about one-third. The pattern for contraceptive use in sub-Saharan Africa, however, has been mixed, with the gap actually increasing in some countries with strong programs. This disparity may largely reflect that family planning in the region is generally at an earlier stage in its history, and so programs may initially be reaching better-off clients, especially in urban areas. To promote additional equity, programs should emphasize efforts to increase access to voluntary family planning services to the least well-off, including those in rural and peri-urban areas.
虽然整个人群的生殖健康指标有所改善,但关于贫富差距随时间推移的趋势,很少有分析。本文根据 1990 年至 2013 年期间进行的国家人口普查,跟踪了 46 个中低收入国家按照财富五分位数衡量的生殖健康指标公平分配的改善情况,特别是避孕措施的使用情况。本文重点关注了一些与计划生育、生育意愿、产前护理以及婴儿和儿童死亡率相关的生殖健康指标在最早和最新调查轮次中,最贫困和最富裕五分位数之间的差距,以及最贫困五分位数的避孕措施使用率的绝对水平的提高。差距变化被分解,以显示由于底部或顶部五分位数,或者两者的变化,差距是如何缩小或扩大的。此外,还进行了双变量相关分析,以检验差距以及贫困人群的避孕措施使用与国家计划生育项目努力之间的关系。总体而言,由于穷人的改善速度快于富人,最贫困和最富裕之间的差距已经缩小。例如,最富裕和最贫穷五分位数之间的现代避孕普及率差距缩小了 25%,从 20.4 个百分点的差异缩小到 15.4 个百分点的差异。而且,在计划生育项目更强的地方,差距缩小得更多。在其他 18 个生殖健康指标中,差距也在缩小。例如,产前护理的贫富差距缩小了三分之一以上,从 30.7 个百分点的差异缩小到 19.6 个百分点。婴儿和儿童死亡率的差距也下降了约三分之一。然而,撒哈拉以南非洲地区的避孕措施使用情况却有所不同,一些计划生育项目较强的国家的差距实际上有所增加。这种差异可能在很大程度上反映了该地区的计划生育总体上处于其历史的早期阶段,因此项目最初可能会覆盖到较富裕的客户,尤其是在城市地区。为了促进更多的公平,项目应强调努力为最贫困的人,包括农村和城郊地区的人,增加获得自愿计划生育服务的机会。