• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估 NHANES 血液中挥发性有机化学物质的生物监测数据:应用化学特异性筛选标准。

Evaluation of NHANES biomonitoring data for volatile organic chemicals in blood: application of chemical-specific screening criteria.

机构信息

Summit Toxicology, Orange Village, Ohio 44022, USA.

出版信息

J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2012 Jan-Feb;22(1):24-34. doi: 10.1038/jes.2011.37. Epub 2011 Oct 12.

DOI:10.1038/jes.2011.37
PMID:21989501
Abstract

Available biomonitoring data for volatile organic chemicals (VOCs) in blood from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) (2003-2004) (CDC, 2009) were compared with recently derived screening biomonitoring equivalent (BE) values (Aylward et al., 2010). A BE is defined as the estimated concentration or range of concentrations of a chemical or its metabolites in a biological medium (blood, urine, or other medium) that is consistent with an existing health-based exposure guidance value. Blood concentrations of VOCs from the NHANES data set were compared with predicted screening BE values based upon a hazard quotient (HQ) for individual chemicals, and a hazard index (HI) approach for combined exposures. HI values for detected chemicals were generally at or below a value of 1, suggesting that the potential for deleterious effects is low. However, smoking was an important determinant of HI and HQ values. Detected levels of benzene in non-smokers were within the range of BE values corresponding to a 1 × 10(-6)-1 × 10(-4) range for upper-bound cancer risk; in smokers, levels of benzene were at the upper end of or exceeded this range. For VOCs that were not detected in the NHANES sampling, analytical detection limits were generally sufficiently sensitive to detect concentrations consistent with existing non-cancer and cancer risk-based exposure guidance values. Interpretations of measured blood concentrations of VOCs must be made with caution due to the substantial within-individual, within-day fluctuations in levels expected due to the rapid elimination of VOCs.

摘要

可获得的美国国家健康和营养检查调查(NHANES)(2003-2004 年)(CDC,2009 年)中血液中挥发性有机化合物(VOCs)的生物监测数据与最近得出的筛选生物监测等效值(BE)进行了比较(Aylward 等人,2010 年)。BE 定义为化学物质或其代谢物在生物介质(血液、尿液或其他介质)中的估计浓度或浓度范围,与现有的基于健康的暴露指导值一致。NHANES 数据集的血液 VOC 浓度与基于单个化学物质危害商(HQ)和联合暴露危害指数(HI)方法预测的筛选 BE 值进行了比较。检测到的化学物质的 HI 值通常在 1 或以下,表明有害影响的可能性较低。然而,吸烟是 HI 和 HQ 值的重要决定因素。非吸烟者血液中的苯浓度在与 1×10(-6)-1×10(-4)范围内上限癌症风险相对应的 BE 值范围内;在吸烟者中,苯的水平处于或超过了这一范围。对于 NHANES 采样中未检测到的 VOCs,分析检测限通常足够灵敏,可以检测到与现有非癌症和癌症风险为基础的暴露指导值一致的浓度。由于 VOC 迅速消除,预计个体内和日内水平会出现很大波动,因此必须谨慎解释 VOC 血液浓度的测量结果。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of NHANES biomonitoring data for volatile organic chemicals in blood: application of chemical-specific screening criteria.评估 NHANES 血液中挥发性有机化学物质的生物监测数据:应用化学特异性筛选标准。
J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2012 Jan-Feb;22(1):24-34. doi: 10.1038/jes.2011.37. Epub 2011 Oct 12.
2
Chemical-specific screening criteria for interpretation of biomonitoring data for volatile organic compounds (VOCs)--application of steady-state PBPK model solutions.化学特异性筛选标准用于解释挥发性有机化合物(VOCs)生物监测数据 - 稳态 PBPK 模型解决方案的应用。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2010 Oct;58(1):33-44. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2010.05.011. Epub 2010 Jun 1.
3
A new method for generating distributions of biomonitoring equivalents to support exposure assessment and prioritization.一种生成生物监测当量分布以支持暴露评估和优先级排序的新方法。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2014 Aug;69(3):434-42. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2014.05.008. Epub 2014 May 17.
4
Biomonitoring Equivalents for benzene.苯的生物监测等效物。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2012 Feb;62(1):62-73. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2011.12.001. Epub 2011 Dec 9.
5
Biomonitoring equivalents for DDT/DDE.滴滴涕/滴滴伊生物监测等效物。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2011 Jul;60(2):172-80. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2011.03.012. Epub 2011 Apr 3.
6
Biomonitoring equivalents: a screening approach for interpreting biomonitoring results from a public health risk perspective.生物监测当量:一种从公共卫生风险角度解释生物监测结果的筛查方法。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2007 Feb;47(1):96-109. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2006.08.004. Epub 2006 Oct 6.
7
Relationships between levels of volatile organic compounds in air and blood from the general population.普通人群空气中挥发性有机化合物水平与血液中挥发性有机化合物水平之间的关系。
J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2008 Jul;18(4):421-9. doi: 10.1038/sj.jes.7500635. Epub 2007 Dec 5.
8
Blood/air distribution of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in a nationally representative sample.血液/空气中挥发性有机化合物(VOCs)在全国代表性样本中的分布。
Sci Total Environ. 2012 Mar 1;419:225-32. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.12.055. Epub 2012 Jan 26.
9
Development of a screening approach to interpret human biomonitoring data on volatile organic compounds: reverse dosimetry on biomonitoring data for trichloroethylene.一种用于解释挥发性有机化合物人体生物监测数据的筛查方法的开发:三氯乙烯生物监测数据的反向剂量测定法。
Risk Anal. 2007 Oct;27(5):1223-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2007.00964.x.
10
Environmental chemicals in people: challenges in interpreting biomonitoring information.人体中的环境化学物质:解读生物监测信息面临的挑战。
J Environ Health. 2008 May;70(9):61-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Blood volatile organic compounds associated with non-reversible and reversible airflow obstruction in US adults.美国成年人中与不可逆和可逆气流阻塞相关的血液挥发性有机化合物
Eur Respir J. 2022 Nov 17;60(5). doi: 10.1183/13993003.01185-2022. Print 2022 Nov.
2
Metabolomics and the Multi-Omics View of Cancer.代谢组学与癌症的多组学视角
Metabolites. 2022 Feb 7;12(2):154. doi: 10.3390/metabo12020154.
3
Volatile Organic Compounds in Blood as Biomarkers of Exposure to JP-8 Jet Fuel Among US Air Force Personnel.血液中的挥发性有机化合物作为美国空军人员接触JP-8喷气燃料的生物标志物
J Occup Environ Med. 2016 Jan;58(1):24-9. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000000611.
4
The use of biomonitoring data in exposure and human health risk assessment: benzene case study.生物监测数据在暴露和人体健康风险评估中的应用:以苯为例。
Crit Rev Toxicol. 2013 Feb;43(2):119-53. doi: 10.3109/10408444.2012.756455.
5
Evaluation of biomonitoring data from the CDC National Exposure Report in a risk assessment context: perspectives across chemicals.在风险评估背景下评估来自疾控中心国家暴露报告的生物监测数据:跨化学品视角。
Environ Health Perspect. 2013 Mar;121(3):287-94. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1205740. Epub 2012 Dec 11.
6
Application of physiologically based pharmacokinetic models in chemical risk assessment.基于生理的药代动力学模型在化学物质风险评估中的应用。
J Toxicol. 2012;2012:904603. doi: 10.1155/2012/904603. Epub 2012 Mar 19.