SA Pathology, IMVS, e Rd, PO Box 14 Rundle Mall, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia.
J Clin Oncol. 2011 Nov 10;29(32):4250-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.35.0934. Epub 2011 Oct 11.
BCR-ABL1 mutation analysis is recommended to facilitate selection of appropriate therapy for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia after treatment with imatinib has failed, since some frequently occurring mutations confer clinical resistance to nilotinib and/or dasatinib. However, mutations could be present below the detection limit of conventional direct sequencing. We developed a sensitive, multiplexed mass spectrometry assay (detection limit, 0.05% to 0.5%) to determine the impact of low-level mutations after imatinib treatment has failed.
Mutation status was assessed in 220 patients treated with nilotinib or dasatinib after they experienced resistance to imatinib.
Mutations were detected by sequencing in 128 patients before commencing nilotinib or dasatinib therapy (switchover). In 64 patients, 132 additional low-level mutations were detected by mass spectrometry alone (50 of 132 mutations were resistant to nilotinib and/or dasatinib). When patients received the inhibitor for which the mutation confers resistance, 84% of the low-level resistant mutations rapidly became dominant clones detectable by sequencing, including 11 of 12 T315I mutations. Subsequent complete cytogenetic response rates were lower for patients with resistant mutations at switchover detected by sequencing (0%) or mass spectrometry alone (16%) compared with patients with other mutations or no mutations (41% and 49%, respectively; P < .001). Failure-free survival among the 100 patients with chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia when resistant mutations were detected at switchover by sequencing or mass spectrometry alone was 0% and 0% compared with 51% and 45% for patients with other mutations or no mutations (P = .003).
Detection of low-level mutations after imatinib resistance offers critical information to guide subsequent therapy selection. If an inappropriate kinase inhibitor is selected, there is a high risk of treatment failure with clonal expansion of the resistant mutant.
在伊马替尼治疗失败后,为了帮助选择合适的治疗方案,建议对慢性髓性白血病患者进行 BCR-ABL1 突变分析,因为一些常见的突变会导致对尼洛替尼和/或达沙替尼的临床耐药。然而,突变可能低于传统直接测序的检测下限。我们开发了一种敏感的、多重质谱分析检测方法(检测下限为 0.05%至 0.5%),以确定伊马替尼治疗失败后低水平突变的影响。
对 220 例因伊马替尼耐药而接受尼洛替尼或达沙替尼治疗的患者进行了突变状态评估。
在开始尼洛替尼或达沙替尼治疗前(转换),通过测序在 128 例患者中检测到突变。在 64 例患者中,仅通过质谱检测到 132 个额外的低水平突变(其中 50 个突变对尼洛替尼和/或达沙替尼耐药)。当患者接受耐药突变所赋予的抑制剂时,84%的低水平耐药突变迅速成为可通过测序检测到的优势克隆,包括 12 个 T315I 突变中的 11 个。与具有其他突变或无突变的患者相比,测序或单独质谱检测到转换时耐药突变的患者的后续完全细胞遗传学反应率较低(分别为 0%和 16%,而 41%和 49%;P<.001)。当在转换时通过测序或单独质谱检测到耐药突变时,100 例慢性期慢性髓性白血病患者的无失败生存分别为 0%和 0%,而具有其他突变或无突变的患者分别为 51%和 45%(P=.003)。
在伊马替尼耐药后检测低水平突变可提供关键信息,指导后续治疗方案的选择。如果选择了不合适的激酶抑制剂,治疗失败的风险很高,耐药突变的克隆会大量扩增。