Suppr超能文献

治疗方式是否会影响颅内动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血患者的血管痉挛分布:血管内介入治疗在手术夹闭和血管内介入治疗人群中对脑血管痉挛的不同应用。

Does treatment modality affect vasospasm distribution in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: differential use of intra-arterial interventions for cerebral vasospasm in surgical clipping and endovascular coiling populations.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA.

出版信息

J Neurointerv Surg. 2010 Jun;2(2):139-44. doi: 10.1136/jnis.2009.000919.

Abstract

OBJECT

Endovascular treatment of cerebral vasospasm consists primarily of transluminal balloon angioplasty (TBA) and intra-arterial (IA) vasodilator administration, the former restricted to use within the distal internal carotid and proximal intracerebral arteries. Our objective was to characterize clinical and angiographic features of those patients undergoing TBA and IA vasodilator treatments, particularly as it related to the aneurysm treatment modality.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of consecutive patients admitted for aneurysmal SAH undergoing IA treatment for cerebral vasospasm (n=73) examining clinical and angiographic variables. Continuous and ordinal means were examined with Mann-Whitney and Student t tests while nominal values were examined with χ(2)/Fisher's exact tests. Multivariate logistic and linear regression included admission Glasgow coma scale, age, number of aneurysms and number of vasospastic vessels.

RESULTS

Those patients receiving IA vasodilator in isolation (n=16) were older (45.9 vs 59.1 years, p=0.001) and more frequently had vasospasm involving the anterior cerebral artery alone (0.0% vs 31.3%, p <0.001). The use of an IA vasodilator alone or in combination with TBA more frequently occurred in the coiled population (32.3% vs 50.1%, p=0.021).

CONCLUSION

TBA and IA vasodilators are safe and effective means to treat cerebral vasospasm. Their use for proximal and distal vasospasm, respectively, and in tandem for diffuse disease, suggests regional differences in cerebral vasospasm between surgical clipping and endovascular coiling populations with coiled patients more often having distal vasospasm. Craniotomy and/or hemorrhagic evacuation performed during open surgery may contribute to this difference.

摘要

目的

血管内治疗脑动脉痉挛主要包括经腔内球囊血管成形术(TBA)和动脉内(IA)血管扩张剂给药,前者仅限于使用在远端颈内动脉和近端脑内动脉。我们的目的是描述接受 TBA 和 IA 血管扩张剂治疗的患者的临床和血管造影特征,特别是与动脉瘤治疗方式的关系。

方法

回顾性分析连续因颅内破裂性动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血而行 IA 治疗以治疗脑动脉痉挛的患者(n=73),检查临床和血管造影变量。连续和有序均值用 Mann-Whitney 和 Student t 检验检查,而名义值用 χ(2)/Fisher 精确检验检查。多变量逻辑和线性回归包括入院时格拉斯哥昏迷量表、年龄、动脉瘤数量和血管痉挛血管数量。

结果

那些单独接受 IA 血管扩张剂治疗的患者(n=16)年龄更大(45.9 岁 vs 59.1 岁,p=0.001),更常出现单纯前脑动脉血管痉挛(0.0% vs 31.3%,p<0.001)。IA 血管扩张剂单独或与 TBA 联合使用更常发生在弹簧圈治疗的人群中(32.3% vs 50.1%,p=0.021)。

结论

TBA 和 IA 血管扩张剂是治疗脑动脉痉挛的安全有效的方法。它们分别用于近端和远端血管痉挛,以及用于弥漫性疾病,表明手术夹闭和血管内弹簧圈治疗人群之间的脑动脉痉挛存在区域性差异,弹簧圈治疗的患者更常出现远端血管痉挛。开颅手术和/或出血清除术可能导致这种差异。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验