School of Psychology, University of Kent, United Kingdom.
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2011 Sep;17(5):943-7. doi: 10.1017/s1355617711000713.
Hemi-spatial neglect can manifest in both the horizontal and radial spatial plane. However, debate exists over how closely the two forms of neglect relate. Here we compared the ability of a neglect patient to bisect stimuli in horizontal versus radial orientation. When oriented horizontally, single lines were mis-bisected to the right, yet when surrounded by visual distracters, the lines were mis-bisected to the left. A leftward bias also emerged when horizontally aligned strings of symbols were bisected. Unexpectedly, an analogous pattern of bias appeared when the stimuli were bisected in radial orientation; stimuli that induced a leftward bias now induced a proximal bias, while stimuli that induced a rightward bias induced a distal bias. Spontaneous reversals in radial bias have not been previously reported, and given that they were coupled with the horizontal reversals, suggest that the spatial boundaries of horizontal and radial neglect are strongly constrained by common stimulus configurations.
半侧空间忽略既可以在水平空间平面中体现,也可以在放射状空间平面中体现。然而,对于这两种忽略形式之间的关联程度,目前仍存在争议。在这里,我们比较了一位忽略症患者对半切刺激物的能力,这些刺激物分别处于水平和放射状方位。当以水平方位呈现时,单一的线被错误地切分到右侧,但当周围有视觉干扰物时,线被错误地切分到左侧。当水平排列的符号串被对半切分时,也出现了向左的偏差。出乎意料的是,当刺激物以放射状方位对半切分时,出现了类似的偏差模式;现在,引起左侧偏差的刺激物引起近端偏差,而引起右侧偏差的刺激物引起远端偏差。放射状偏差的自发反转以前没有被报道过,鉴于它们与水平反转相关,这表明水平和放射状忽略的空间边界受到共同刺激配置的强烈限制。