• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

影响强迫症决策过程的躯体标记。

The somatic marker affecting decisional processes in obsessive-compulsive disorder.

作者信息

Cavedini Paolo, Zorzi Claudia, Baraldi Clementina, Patrini Sara, Salomoni Giuliana, Bellodi Laura, Freire Rafael C, Perna Giampaolo

机构信息

Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Villa San Benedetto Hospital, Hermanas Hospitalarias, Albese con Cassano, Italy.

出版信息

Cogn Neuropsychiatry. 2012;17(2):177-90. doi: 10.1080/13546805.2011.614152. Epub 2011 Oct 12.

DOI:10.1080/13546805.2011.614152
PMID:21991936
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) demonstrate impairment in decisional processes in which both cognition and emotion play a crucial role.

METHODS

We investigated the connection between decision-making performances and choice-related skin conductance responses (SCRs), to identify a somatic marker impairment affecting decisional processes in these patients. We explored SCRs during the Iowa Gambling Task in 20 OCD and 18 control, measuring anticipatory and posticipatory psychophysiological reactions according to card choices and to the outcomes of each selection.

RESULTS

Most patients exhibited weaker SCRs compared to HC, although there weren't substantial differences in magnitude between the two groups. In contrast with HC, patients with OCD showed no significant differences of SCRs activation according to card selections; they chose cards from neither favourable nor unfavourable decks.

CONCLUSIONS

The main finding of the study were the evidence of a dysfunctional biological marker in OCD subjects, affecting decision-making process. Dysfunctional patterns of SCRs could partially explain OCDs' impairment in this ability. Decision-making deficits in OCDs could be influenced in part by the lack of somatic differences in discriminating between advantageous and disadvantageous behaviour. These findings could lead to a more complete understanding of OCD.

摘要

引言

强迫症(OCD)患者在决策过程中表现出功能障碍,其中认知和情感都起着至关重要的作用。

方法

我们研究了决策表现与选择相关的皮肤电导率反应(SCR)之间的联系,以确定影响这些患者决策过程的躯体标记物损伤。我们在爱荷华赌博任务中对20名强迫症患者和18名对照组进行了SCR测量,根据卡片选择和每次选择的结果测量预期和事后的心理生理反应。

结果

与健康对照组相比,大多数患者的SCR较弱,尽管两组之间在幅度上没有实质性差异。与健康对照组不同,强迫症患者根据卡片选择的SCR激活没有显著差异;他们既不从不有利的牌组也不从不有利的牌组中选择卡片。

结论

该研究的主要发现是强迫症患者存在功能失调的生物学标记物的证据,这影响了决策过程。SCR的功能失调模式可以部分解释强迫症患者在这种能力上的损伤。强迫症患者的决策缺陷可能部分受到在区分有利和不利行为时缺乏躯体差异的影响。这些发现可能会导致对强迫症有更全面的理解。

相似文献

1
The somatic marker affecting decisional processes in obsessive-compulsive disorder.影响强迫症决策过程的躯体标记。
Cogn Neuropsychiatry. 2012;17(2):177-90. doi: 10.1080/13546805.2011.614152. Epub 2011 Oct 12.
2
Skin conductance responses during decisions in ambiguous and risky situations in obsessive-compulsive disorder.强迫症患者在模糊和危险情境下做决策时的皮肤电导率反应
Cogn Neuropsychiatry. 2009 May;14(3):199-216. doi: 10.1080/13546800902996831.
3
Psychophysiological determinants and concomitants of deficient decision making in pathological gamblers.病态赌徒决策缺陷的心理生理决定因素及伴随情况。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2006 Oct 1;84(3):231-9. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2006.02.007. Epub 2006 Mar 30.
4
Comparison of deck- and trial-based approaches to advantageous decision making on the Iowa Gambling Task.基于牌面和试次的优势决策制定方法在 Iowa 赌博任务中的比较。
Psychol Assess. 2012 Jun;24(2):455-63. doi: 10.1037/a0025932. Epub 2011 Oct 31.
5
Decision making and set shifting impairments are associated with distinct symptom dimensions in obsessive-compulsive disorder.决策和定势转换障碍与强迫症中不同的症状维度相关。
Neuropsychology. 2006 Jul;20(4):409-19. doi: 10.1037/0894-4105.20.4.409.
6
Decision-making, somatic markers and emotion processing in opiate users.阿片类药物使用者的决策、躯体标记和情绪处理。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2018 Jan;235(1):223-232. doi: 10.1007/s00213-017-4760-0. Epub 2017 Oct 23.
7
Decision-making impairment is related to serotonin transporter promoter polymorphism in a sample of patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder.在一组强迫症患者样本中,决策功能损害与血清素转运体启动子多态性有关。
Behav Brain Res. 2008 Dec 16;195(1):159-63. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2008.05.015. Epub 2008 May 29.
8
Psychophysiological anticipation of positive outcomes promotes advantageous decision-making in normal older persons.对积极结果的心理生理预期促进正常老年人做出有利决策。
Int J Psychophysiol. 2006 Jul;61(1):19-25. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2005.10.021. Epub 2006 Jan 19.
9
Cognitive deficits of executive functions and decision-making in obsessive-compulsive disorder.强迫症患者执行功能和决策认知缺陷。
Scand J Psychol. 2013 Oct;54(5):393-400. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12066. Epub 2013 Jul 10.
10
Anxiety impairs decision-making: psychophysiological evidence from an Iowa Gambling Task.焦虑会损害决策能力:来自爱荷华赌博任务的心理生理学证据。
Biol Psychol. 2008 Mar;77(3):353-8. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2007.11.010. Epub 2007 Dec 7.

引用本文的文献

1
SAPAP3, SPRED2, and obsessive-compulsive disorder: the search for fundamental phenotypes.突触后密度蛋白95、果蝇盘大肿瘤抑制蛋白和肌动蛋白相关蛋白3、Sprouty相关蛋白2与强迫症:寻找基本表型
Front Mol Neurosci. 2023 May 31;16:1095455. doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2023.1095455. eCollection 2023.
2
Behavioral domains in compulsive rats: implications for understanding compulsive spectrum disorders.强迫行为大鼠的行为领域:对理解强迫谱系障碍的启示
Front Behav Neurosci. 2023 May 18;17:1175137. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2023.1175137. eCollection 2023.
3
Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder and Decision Making under Ambiguity: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.
强迫症与模糊情境下的决策:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Brain Sci. 2021 Jan 22;11(2):143. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11020143.
4
Do Individuals With Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder and Obsessive-Compulsive Personality Disorder Share Similar Neural Mechanisms of Decision-Making Under Ambiguous Circumstances?患有强迫症和强迫型人格障碍的个体在模糊情境下的决策神经机制是否相似?
Front Hum Neurosci. 2020 Oct 22;14:585086. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.585086. eCollection 2020.
5
Self-reported and neurocognitive impulsivity in obsessive-compulsive disorder.强迫症患者的自我报告和神经认知冲动性。
Compr Psychiatry. 2020 Feb;97:152155. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2019.152155. Epub 2019 Dec 16.
6
Decision Making Profile of Positive and Negative Anticipatory Skin Conductance Responders in an Unlimited-Time Version of the IGT.在无限时长版爱荷华赌博任务中,正负预期性皮肤电传导反应者的决策概况。
Front Psychol. 2019 Oct 15;10:2237. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02237. eCollection 2019.
7
Addicted to compulsion: assessing three core dimensions of addiction across obsessive-compulsive disorder and gambling disorder.成瘾于强迫:评估强迫症和赌博障碍中成瘾的三个核心维度。
CNS Spectr. 2020 Jun;25(3):392-401. doi: 10.1017/S1092852919000993. Epub 2019 May 20.
8
Neurocognitive assessment in obsessive compulsive disorder patients: Adherence to behavioral decision models.强迫症患者的神经认知评估:对行为决策模型的依从性。
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 15;14(2):e0211856. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211856. eCollection 2019.
9
Selective impairment of decision making under ambiguity in alexithymia.述情障碍者在模糊情境下决策能力的选择性损伤。
BMC Psychiatry. 2017 Nov 28;17(1):378. doi: 10.1186/s12888-017-1537-2.
10
Decision-making, somatic markers and emotion processing in opiate users.阿片类药物使用者的决策、躯体标记和情绪处理。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2018 Jan;235(1):223-232. doi: 10.1007/s00213-017-4760-0. Epub 2017 Oct 23.