Suppr超能文献

强迫行为大鼠的行为领域:对理解强迫谱系障碍的启示

Behavioral domains in compulsive rats: implications for understanding compulsive spectrum disorders.

作者信息

Martín-González Elena, Olmedo-Córdoba Manuela, Prados-Pardo Ángeles, Cruz-Garzón Daniel J, Flores Pilar, Mora Santiago, Moreno-Montoya Margarita

机构信息

Department of Psychology and Health Research Centre (CEINSA), University of Almería, Almería, Spain.

Department of Neuroscience and Panum Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Front Behav Neurosci. 2023 May 18;17:1175137. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2023.1175137. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Compulsive behavior has been proposed as a transdiagnostic trait observed in different neuropsychiatric disorders, such as obsessive-compulsive disorder, autism, and schizophrenia. Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) strategy could help to disentangle the neuropsychological basis of compulsivity for developing new therapeutic and preventive approaches. In preclinical research, the selection of high-drinker (HD) vs. low-drinker (LD) animals by schedule-induced polydipsia (SIP) is considered a putative model of compulsivity, which includes a well-differentiated behavioral pattern.

METHODS

The purpose of this research was to assess the cognitive control and the negative valence system domains in a phenotype of compulsive HD rats. After the selection of animals as HD or LD, we assessed behavioral inflexibility by probabilistic spatial reversal learning (PSRL), motor and cognitive impulsivity by variable delay-to-signal (VDS), and risky decision-making by rodent gambling task (rGT).

RESULTS

HD rats performed fewer reversals and showed less probability of pressing the same lever that was previously reinforced on PSRL, more premature responses after the exposure to longer delays on VDS, and more disadvantageous risky choices on rGT. Moreover, HD animals performed more perseverative responses under the punishment period on rGT.

DISCUSSION

These results highlight that HD compulsive phenotype exhibits behavioral inflexibility, insensitivity to positive feedback, waiting impulsivity, risky decision-making, and frustrative non-reward responsiveness. Moreover, these findings demonstrate the importance of mapping different behavioral domains to prevent, treat, and diagnose compulsive spectrum disorders correctly.

摘要

引言

强迫行为已被提出作为一种在不同神经精神疾病中观察到的跨诊断特征,如强迫症、自闭症和精神分裂症。研究领域标准(RDoC)策略有助于厘清强迫行为的神经心理学基础,以开发新的治疗和预防方法。在临床前研究中,通过定时诱导多饮(SIP)选择高饮水(HD)与低饮水(LD)动物被认为是一种强迫行为的假定模型,其中包括一种分化良好的行为模式。

方法

本研究的目的是评估强迫性HD大鼠表型中的认知控制和负性价系统领域。在将动物选为HD或LD后,我们通过概率空间反转学习(PSRL)评估行为灵活性,通过可变信号延迟(VDS)评估运动和认知冲动性,通过啮齿动物赌博任务(rGT)评估风险决策。

结果

HD大鼠在PSRL上的反转次数较少,且按压先前强化过的同一杠杆的概率较低,在VDS上暴露于较长延迟后出现更多过早反应,在rGT上做出更不利的风险选择。此外,HD动物在rGT的惩罚期内表现出更多的持续性反应。

讨论

这些结果突出表明,HD强迫表型表现出行为灵活性、对正性反馈不敏感、等待冲动性、风险决策以及挫折性无奖励反应。此外,这些发现证明了描绘不同行为领域对于正确预防、治疗和诊断强迫谱系障碍的重要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/997c/10234153/583dc0930576/fnbeh-17-1175137-g0001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验