• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

皮下神经电刺激:一种治疗难治性心绞痛的可行新方法。

Subcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation: a feasible and new method for the treatment of patients with refractory angina.

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen and University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Neuromodulation. 2011 May-Jun;14(3):258-65; discussion 265. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1403.2011.00355.x. Epub 2011 Apr 19.

DOI:10.1111/j.1525-1403.2011.00355.x
PMID:21992250
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Patients suffering from chronic angina pectoris, insufficiently controllable with medication and revascularization, are an increasing medical and psychosocial problem. Although spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is proven to employ, safe, long-term anti-angina, and anti-ischemic effects for these patients, the use of SCS in this group remains limited. The reason for this restricted use is largely unknown. However, among other reasons, it may be related to the difficulties in positioning an electrode in the epidural space. We studied the feasibility and efficacy of subcutaneous implantation of an entire system.

METHODS

Seven male patients, mean age 67 ± 3.6 years, received complete subcutaneously implanted electrical nerve stimulation (SENS) systems, with one or more leads fixed in parallel with the sternum, covering the angina area. At baseline and 2 months follow-up patients performed exercise and quality of life tests (Seattle Angina Questionnaire and diaries number angina attacks and glyceryl trinitrate use).

RESULTS

All patients showed clinical relevant improvement (baseline vs. follow-up), in exercise (63%) and quality of life (Seattle Angina Questionnaire 59%). The number of angina attacks dropped 82% and the number of glyceryl trinitrate use decreased by 90%. No major adverse events were observed.

CONCLUSION

This small feasibility study demonstrates SENS to be an effective and safe method to treat patients suffering from refractory angina. Furthermore, SENS is less invasive and appears to have less lead migrations compared with SCS.

摘要

简介

患有慢性稳定性心绞痛的患者,经药物和血运重建治疗后仍控制不佳,这是一个日益严重的医学和心理社会问题。尽管脊髓刺激(SCS)已被证明对这些患者具有长期的抗心绞痛和抗缺血作用,且安全有效,但 SCS 在这一人群中的应用仍然有限。其原因尚不清楚。然而,除其他原因外,这可能与在硬膜外腔中定位电极的困难有关。我们研究了皮下植入整个系统的可行性和疗效。

方法

7 名男性患者,平均年龄 67 ± 3.6 岁,接受了完整的皮下植入式电神经刺激(SENS)系统治疗,一根或多根电极与胸骨平行固定,覆盖心绞痛区域。在基线和 2 个月的随访时,患者进行了运动和生活质量测试(西雅图心绞痛问卷和心绞痛发作次数和硝化甘油使用日记)。

结果

所有患者均表现出临床相关的改善(基线与随访相比),在运动(63%)和生活质量(西雅图心绞痛问卷 59%)方面。心绞痛发作次数减少了 82%,硝化甘油使用次数减少了 90%。未观察到重大不良事件。

结论

这项小型可行性研究表明,SENS 是治疗难治性心绞痛患者的一种有效且安全的方法。此外,与 SCS 相比,SENS 具有侵入性更小,且电极移位的可能性更小。

相似文献

1
Subcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation: a feasible and new method for the treatment of patients with refractory angina.皮下神经电刺激:一种治疗难治性心绞痛的可行新方法。
Neuromodulation. 2011 May-Jun;14(3):258-65; discussion 265. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1403.2011.00355.x. Epub 2011 Apr 19.
2
Multimorbidity, the predominant predictor of quality-of-life, following successful spinal cord stimulation for angina pectoris.多种并存疾病是影响心绞痛脊髓刺激成功后生活质量的主要预测因素。
Neuromodulation. 2011 Jan;14(1):13-8; discussion 18-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1403.2010.00321.x. Epub 2010 Dec 13.
3
Stimulation characteristics, complications, and efficacy of spinal cord stimulation systems in patients with refractory angina: a prospective feasibility study.脊髓刺激系统用于难治性心绞痛患者的刺激特性、并发症及疗效:一项前瞻性可行性研究
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1994 Nov;17(11 Pt 1):1751-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1994.tb03742.x.
4
Long-term effects of spinal cord stimulation on angina symptoms and quality of life in patients with refractory angina pectoris--results from the European Angina Registry Link Study (EARL).脊髓刺激对难治性心绞痛患者心绞痛症状和生活质量的长期影响——来自欧洲心绞痛登记研究链接研究(EARL)的结果。
Heart. 2010 Jul;96(14):1132-6. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2009.177188. Epub 2010 May 18.
5
[Spinal cord stimulation in refractory angina pectoris -- a case description].[脊髓刺激治疗顽固性心绞痛——病例描述]
Neurol Neurochir Pol. 2005 Sep-Oct;39(5):417-9.
6
Efficacy of spinal cord stimulation as adjuvant therapy for intractable angina pectoris: a prospective, randomized clinical study. Working Group on Neurocardiology.脊髓刺激作为顽固性心绞痛辅助治疗的疗效:一项前瞻性、随机临床研究。神经心脏病学工作组。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994 Jun;23(7):1592-7. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(94)90661-0.
7
[Neuromodulation as an alternative method in the treatment of refractory angina pectoris].[神经调节作为治疗顽固性心绞痛的替代方法]
Wien Med Wochenschr. 2001;151(15-17):405-8.
8
Long-term home treatment with epidural analgesia does not affect later spinal cord stimulation in patients with otherwise intractable angina pectoris.对于其他治疗方法难以控制的心绞痛患者,长期在家进行硬膜外镇痛治疗不会影响其后续的脊髓刺激治疗效果。
Clin J Pain. 1998 Dec;14(4):315-9. doi: 10.1097/00002508-199812000-00008.
9
The sustained benefits of long-term neurostimulation in patients with refractory chest pain and normal coronary arteries.长期神经刺激对难治性胸痛且冠状动脉正常患者的持续益处。
Eur J Pain. 2007 Apr;11(3):360-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2006.04.002. Epub 2006 Jun 9.
10
Atypical facial pain treated with upper thoracic dorsal column stimulation.上胸段背柱刺激治疗非典型面痛。
Clin J Pain. 2011 Jul-Aug;27(6):556-8. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e31820d276d.

引用本文的文献

1
Long term management of refractory angina due to cardiac syndrome X with peripheral nerve field stimulation (PNfS).心脏综合征X所致难治性心绞痛的外周神经场刺激(PNfS)长期管理
Interv Pain Med. 2025 Aug 27;4(3):100639. doi: 10.1016/j.inpm.2025.100639. eCollection 2025 Sep.
2
Peripheral neuromodulation: a review.外周神经调节:综述
Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2014 May;18(5):412. doi: 10.1007/s11916-014-0412-9.
3
Treatment of refractory angina in patients not suitable for revascularization.治疗不适宜血运重建的难治性心绞痛。
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2014 Feb;11(2):78-95. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2013.200. Epub 2013 Dec 24.
4
Electrical neuromodulation for patients with cardiac diseases.电神经调节治疗心脏病患者。
Neth Heart J. 2013 Feb;21(2):91-4. doi: 10.1007/s12471-012-0356-9.