• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术作为高危局限性前列腺癌多模式治疗的初始步骤:160 例男性的初步经验。

Robotic radical prostatectomy as the initial step in multimodal therapy for men with high-risk localised prostate cancer: initial experience of 160 men.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

BJU Int. 2012 Mar;109(5):752-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10548.x. Epub 2011 Oct 12.

DOI:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10548.x
PMID:21992472
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

• To report the outcome of robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) for men with localised high-risk prostate cancer at diagnosis. • Although commonly managed by radiotherapy (RT) with prolonged androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT), we hypothesize that initiation of multimodal therapy with RALP is oncologically efficacious and may allow many men to avoid ADT.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

• Between December 2003 and September 2010, 1480 men underwent RALP of whom 160 fulfilled the National Comprehensive Control Network criteria for high-risk disease (prostate-specific antigen (PSA) > 20 ng/mL and/or clinical stage, cT ≥ 3 and/or biopsy Gleason score ≥ 8). • Biochemical recurrence (postoperative PSA ≥ 0.2) was used to assess outcome after RALP monotherapy. • Treatment failure was defined as either a rising PSA level after salvage RT or the initiation of ADT.

RESULTS

• The mean age ± standard deviation was 63.1 ± 6.3 years. Median PSA level was 9.95 ng/mL (interquartile range 6.0-21.4). • Analysis of prostatectomy specimen showed Gleason 8-10 cancers in 65 (41%), and extracapsular disease, pT ≥ 3, in 96 (60%) of which seminal vesicle invasion was evident in 36 (23%). Downgrading by prostatectomy occurred in 64 (40% of total group) and five (3%) were downstaged to pT2 disease. By contrast, any upgrading occurred in 29 (18% of total group) and upstaging occurred in 68 (43%). The overall positive surgical margin rate was 38%, correlating with stage pT2 (15%) or pT3 (53%). • With median follow-up of 26.2 months (interquartile range 5.5-37.3), two non-cancer-related deaths have occurred (overall survival 98.8%; cancer-specific survival 100%), and biochemical recurrence has occurred in 53 men (33%). RALP surgery has served as monotherapy (n= 117, 73%), or has been followed by salvage RT (n= 24, 15%) and/or ADT (n= 43, 27%). Overall 2-year and 3-year treatment failure was 31 and 41%, respectively. • Serum PSA level was the only independent predictor of overall treatment failure (hazard ratio [HR] 1.02, P= 0.001) although a strong trend was observed for both clinical stage (HR 1.22, P= 0.058) and the number of positive biopsy cores on transrectal biopsy (HR 1.06, P= 0.057).

CONCLUSIONS

• RALP incorporating the use of postoperative RT is a good multimodal management strategy for men with this aggressive variant of prostate cancer. • At median follow-up in excess of 2 years, we found low rates of treatment failure enabling a high proportion of men to remain free of ADT.

摘要

目的

• 报告诊断为局部高危前列腺癌男性接受机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术(RALP)的结果。• 虽然通常通过放疗(RT)联合长期雄激素剥夺治疗(ADT)进行治疗,但我们假设RALP 起始的多模式治疗在肿瘤学上是有效的,并且可以使许多男性避免 ADT。

患者和方法

• 2003 年 12 月至 2010 年 9 月,1480 名男性接受了 RALP,其中 160 名符合国家综合控制网络的高危疾病标准(前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)>20ng/mL 和/或临床分期,cT≥3 和/或活检 Gleason 评分≥8)。• 生化复发(术后 PSA≥0.2)用于评估 RALP 单一疗法的结果。• 治疗失败定义为挽救性 RT 后 PSA 水平升高或开始 ADT。

结果

• 平均年龄±标准差为 63.1±6.3 岁。中位 PSA 水平为 9.95ng/mL(四分位距 6.0-21.4)。• 前列腺切除术标本分析显示,65 例(41%)为 Gleason 8-10 级癌症,96 例(60%)为包膜外疾病,pT≥3,其中 36 例(23%)可见精囊侵犯。64 例(总组的 40%)发生前列腺癌降级,5 例(3%)降为 pT2 疾病。相比之下,29 例(总组的 18%)发生任何升级,68 例(43%)发生升级。总的阳性切缘率为 38%,与 pT2(15%)或 pT3(53%)相关。• 在中位随访 26.2 个月(四分位距 5.5-37.3)时,发生了 2 例非癌症相关死亡(总生存率 98.8%;癌症特异性生存率 100%),53 例患者(33%)发生生化复发。RALP 手术作为单一疗法(n=117,73%),或随后进行挽救性 RT(n=24,15%)和/或 ADT(n=43,27%)。总的 2 年和 3 年治疗失败率分别为 31%和 41%。• 血清 PSA 水平是总治疗失败的唯一独立预测因素(风险比[HR]1.02,P=0.001),尽管临床分期(HR 1.22,P=0.058)和经直肠活检阳性活检核心数(HR 1.06,P=0.057)有强烈的趋势。

结论

• RALP 联合术后 RT 是治疗这种侵袭性前列腺癌的一种良好的多模式管理策略。• 在超过 2 年的中位随访中,我们发现治疗失败的发生率较低,使大多数男性能够避免 ADT。

相似文献

1
Robotic radical prostatectomy as the initial step in multimodal therapy for men with high-risk localised prostate cancer: initial experience of 160 men.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术作为高危局限性前列腺癌多模式治疗的初始步骤:160 例男性的初步经验。
BJU Int. 2012 Mar;109(5):752-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10548.x. Epub 2011 Oct 12.
2
Improved biochemical outcome with adjuvant radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer with poor pathologic features.对于具有不良病理特征的前列腺癌患者,根治性前列腺切除术后辅助放疗可改善生化结局。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005 Mar 1;61(3):714-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.06.018.
3
Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.辅助治疗初治患者根治性前列腺切除术后切缘阳性对前列腺特异抗原失败的影响。
BJU Int. 2011 Jun;107(11):1748-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09728.x. Epub 2010 Sep 30.
4
External beam radiotherapy versus radical prostatectomy for clinical stage T1-2 prostate cancer: therapeutic implications of stratification by pretreatment PSA levels and biopsy Gleason scores.临床分期为T1-2期前列腺癌的体外放射治疗与根治性前列腺切除术:根据治疗前前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)水平和活检Gleason评分分层的治疗意义
Cancer J Sci Am. 1997 Mar-Apr;3(2):78-87.
5
Treatment failure and clinical progression after salvage therapy in men with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy: radiotherapy vs androgen deprivation.根治性前列腺切除术后生化复发的男性挽救性治疗后治疗失败和临床进展:放疗与雄激素剥夺治疗。
BJU Int. 2010 Jul;106(2):188-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.09136.x. Epub 2009 Dec 11.
6
Operative details and oncological and functional outcome of robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: 400 cases with a minimum of 12 months follow-up.机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术的手术细节、肿瘤学及功能结果:400例患者,至少随访12个月
Eur Urol. 2009 Jun;55(6):1358-66. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.12.035. Epub 2009 Jan 9.
7
Factors affecting recurrence rates after prostatectomy or radiotherapy in localized prostate carcinoma patients with biopsy Gleason score 8 or above.活检Gleason评分8分及以上的局限性前列腺癌患者前列腺切除术后或放疗后的复发率影响因素。
Cancer. 2002 Dec 1;95(11):2302-7. doi: 10.1002/cncr.10977.
8
Correlation of clinical and pathologic factors with rising prostate-specific antigen profiles after radical prostatectomy alone for clinically localized prostate cancer.临床局限性前列腺癌单纯根治性前列腺切除术后临床及病理因素与前列腺特异性抗原水平升高的相关性
Urology. 1996 Aug;48(2):249-60. doi: 10.1016/S0090-4295(96)00167-7.
9
Identification of factors predicting response to adjuvant radiation therapy in patients with positive margins after radical prostatectomy.根治性前列腺切除术后切缘阳性患者中预测辅助放疗反应的因素的识别。
J Urol. 2003 Nov;170(5):1860-3. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000092503.45951.c2.
10
Radical prostatectomy vs radiation therapy and androgen-suppression therapy in high-risk prostate cancer.高危前列腺癌的根治性前列腺切除术与放疗和雄激素抑制治疗比较。
BJU Int. 2012 Oct;110(8):1116-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11012.x. Epub 2012 Apr 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical and oncological outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with nerve sparing vs. non-nerve sparing for high-risk prostate cancer cases.高危前列腺癌病例中保留神经与不保留神经的机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的临床和肿瘤学结果
Oncol Lett. 2019 Oct;18(4):3896-3902. doi: 10.3892/ol.2019.10692. Epub 2019 Jul 31.
2
Pathological outcomes and biochemical recurrence-free survival after radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer in the Indian population.印度人群中高危前列腺癌根治性前列腺切除术后的病理结果及无生化复发生存率
Indian J Urol. 2018 Oct-Dec;34(4):260-267. doi: 10.4103/iju.IJU_65_18.
3
Positive surgical margin is associated with biochemical recurrence risk following radical prostatectomy: a meta-analysis from high-quality retrospective cohort studies.
阳性切缘与根治性前列腺切除术后生化复发风险相关:来自高质量回顾性队列研究的荟萃分析。
World J Surg Oncol. 2018 Jul 3;16(1):124. doi: 10.1186/s12957-018-1433-3.
4
Biochemical Recurrence Prediction in High-Risk Prostate Cancer Patients, Following Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy.高危前列腺癌患者机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后的生化复发预测
Yonago Acta Med. 2016 Dec 26;59(4):288-295. eCollection 2016 Dec.
5
Safety of selective nerve sparing in high risk prostate cancer during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术中高危前列腺癌保留神经的安全性
J Robot Surg. 2017 Jun;11(2):129-138. doi: 10.1007/s11701-016-0627-3. Epub 2016 Jul 19.
6
Analysis of outcome following robotic assisted radical prostatectomy for patients with high risk prostate cancer as per D'Amico classification.根据达米科分类法对高危前列腺癌患者行机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后的结局分析。
Indian J Urol. 2016 Apr-Jun;32(2):115-9. doi: 10.4103/0970-1591.179187.
7
Optimal management of prostate cancer with lethal biology--state-of-the-art local therapy.具有致命生物学特性的前列腺癌的优化管理——最新的局部治疗方法
Asian J Androl. 2015 Nov-Dec;17(6):888-91. doi: 10.4103/1008-682X.156855.
8
Robotic radical prostatectomy in high-risk prostate cancer: current perspectives.高危前列腺癌的机器人根治性前列腺切除术:当前观点
Asian J Androl. 2015 Nov-Dec;17(6):908-15; discussion 913. doi: 10.4103/1008-682X.153541.
9
Overall rate, location, and predictive factors for positive surgical margins after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer.高危前列腺癌机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术后切缘阳性的总体发生率、位置及预测因素
Asian J Androl. 2016 Jan-Feb;18(1):123-8. doi: 10.4103/1008-682X.148723.
10
Role of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in the management of high-risk prostate cancer.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术在高危前列腺癌治疗中的作用。
Indian J Urol. 2014 Oct;30(4):410-7. doi: 10.4103/0970-1591.142067.