• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术中高危前列腺癌保留神经的安全性

Safety of selective nerve sparing in high risk prostate cancer during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

作者信息

Kumar Anup, Samavedi Srinivas, Bates Anthony S, Mouraviev Vladimir, Coelho Rafael F, Rocco Bernardo, Patel Vipul R

机构信息

Department of Urology, University of Central Florida College of Medicine and Global Robotics Institute, Florida Hospital-Celebration Health, Kissimmee, FL, USA.

出版信息

J Robot Surg. 2017 Jun;11(2):129-138. doi: 10.1007/s11701-016-0627-3. Epub 2016 Jul 19.

DOI:10.1007/s11701-016-0627-3
PMID:27435701
Abstract

D'Amico high risk prostate cancer is associated with higher incidence of extra prostatic disease. It is recommended to avoid nerve sparing in high risk patients to avoid residual cancer. We report our intermediate term oncologic and functional outcomes in patients with preoperative D'Amico high risk prostate cancer, who underwent selective nerve sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). Between Jan 2008 till June 2013, 557 patients underwent RARP for D'Amico high risk prostate cancer. The criteria for nerve sparing were as follows-complete: non palpable disease with <3 cores involvement on prostate biopsy; partial: non palpable disease with <4 cores involvement on prostate biopsy; none: clinically palpable disease with ≥4 cores involvement on prostate biopsy and intraoperative visual cues of locally advanced disease (loss of dissection planes, focal bulge of prostatic capsule). Degree of nerve sparing (NS) was graded intraoperatively by the surgeon independently at either side as side specific margins were assessed to predict subjectivity of the intraoperative judgment. Various data were collected and analyzed. Of 557 patients who underwent RARP 140 underwent complete (group 1), 358 patients underwent partial (group 2), and 59 patients underwent non-nerve-sparing procedure (group 3). There were no difference in preoperative characteristic between the groups (p = 0.678), but group 3 had higher Gleason score sum (p = 0.001), positive cores on biopsy (p = 0.001) and higher t stage (p = 0.001). Postoperatively Extra prostatic extension (p = 0.001), seminal vesicle invasion (p = 0.001), and tumor volume (p < 0.001) were higher in Group 3. Side specific positive surgical margins (PSMs) rates were higher for non-nerve-sparing compared to partial and complete nerve sparing RARP (p < 0.001; overall PSMs = 25.2 %). On univariate and multivariate analysis, nerve sparing did not affect PSMs (p > 0.05). The overall biochemical recurrence (BCR) rate at mean follow-up of 24.3 months was 19.21 %. The continence rate at 3 month was significantly higher in complete NS group in comparison to non-NS group (p = 0.020), however, this difference was not statistically significant at 1 year. Similarly, mean time to continence was significantly lower in complete NS group in comparison to non-NS group (p = 0.030). The potency rate was significantly higher and mean time to potency was significantly lower in complete NS group in comparison to non-NS group (p = 0.010 and 0.020, respectively). In high risk prostate cancer patients, selective nerve sparing during RARP, using the preoperative clinical variables (clinical stage and positive cores on biopsy) and surgeon's intraoperative perception, could provide reasonable intermediate term oncologic, functional outcomes (continence and potency) with acceptable perioperative morbidity and positive surgical margins rate. Use of these preoperative factors and surgeon's intraoperative judgment can appropriately evaluate high risk prostate cancer patients for nerve sparing RARP.

摘要

达米科高危前列腺癌与前列腺外疾病的较高发生率相关。建议对高危患者避免保留神经以避免残留癌。我们报告了术前诊断为达米科高危前列腺癌且接受选择性保留神经机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术(RARP)患者的中期肿瘤学和功能结果。2008年1月至2013年6月期间,557例患者因达米科高危前列腺癌接受了RARP。保留神经的标准如下:完全保留:前列腺活检时无可触及病变且累及芯数<3个;部分保留:前列腺活检时无可触及病变且累及芯数<4个;不保留:临床可触及病变且前列腺活检累及芯数≥4个以及术中提示局部进展性疾病的视觉线索(解剖层面消失、前列腺包膜局灶性隆起)。由于术中对侧方切缘进行评估以预测术中判断的主观性,因此由外科医生独立对保留神经(NS)的程度在两侧进行术中分级。收集并分析了各种数据。在557例行RARP的患者中,140例接受了完全保留神经(第1组),358例接受了部分保留神经(第2组),59例接受了不保留神经手术(第3组)。各组术前特征无差异(p = 0.678),但第3组的Gleason评分总和更高(p = 0.001)、活检阳性芯数更多(p = 0.001)且t分期更高(p = 0.001)。术后第3组的前列腺外扩展(p = 0.001)、精囊侵犯(p = 0.001)和肿瘤体积(p < 0.001)更高。与部分和完全保留神经的RARP相比,不保留神经的手术侧方阳性手术切缘(PSM)率更高(p < 0.001;总体PSM = 25.2%)。单因素和多因素分析显示,保留神经不影响PSM(p > 0.05)。平均随访24.3个月时的总体生化复发(BCR)率为19.21%。完全保留神经组3个月时的控尿率显著高于不保留神经组(p = 0.020),然而,1年时这种差异无统计学意义。同样,完全保留神经组达到控尿的平均时间显著短于不保留神经组(p = 0.030)。完全保留神经组的勃起功能恢复率显著更高且达到勃起功能恢复的平均时间显著更短,与不保留神经组相比(分别为p = 0.010和0.020)。在高危前列腺癌患者中,在RARP期间根据术前临床变量(临床分期和活检阳性芯数)以及外科医生的术中判断进行选择性保留神经,可提供合理的中期肿瘤学和功能结果(控尿和勃起功能),围手术期发病率和阳性手术切缘率可接受。使用这些术前因素和外科医生的术中判断可适当评估高危前列腺癌患者是否适合行保留神经的RARP。

相似文献

1
Safety of selective nerve sparing in high risk prostate cancer during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术中高危前列腺癌保留神经的安全性
J Robot Surg. 2017 Jun;11(2):129-138. doi: 10.1007/s11701-016-0627-3. Epub 2016 Jul 19.
2
Predictive factors and oncological outcomes of persistently elevated prostate-specific antigen in patients following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后患者前列腺特异性抗原持续升高的预测因素及肿瘤学结局
J Robot Surg. 2017 Mar;11(1):37-45. doi: 10.1007/s11701-016-0606-8. Epub 2016 May 31.
3
Current status of various neurovascular bundle-sparing techniques in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术中各种保留神经血管束技术的现状
J Robot Surg. 2016 Sep;10(3):187-200. doi: 10.1007/s11701-016-0607-7. Epub 2016 Jun 1.
4
Use of preoperative factors including urodynamic evaluations and nerve-sparing status for predicting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Nerve-sparing technique contributes to the reduction of postprostatectomy incontinence.利用包括尿动力学评估和神经保留状态在内的术前因素预测机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后尿失禁恢复情况:神经保留技术有助于减少前列腺切除术后尿失禁。
Neurourol Urodyn. 2016 Nov;35(8):1034-1039. doi: 10.1002/nau.22877. Epub 2015 Sep 9.
5
RARP in high-risk prostate cancer: use of multi-parametric MRI and nerve sparing techniques.高危前列腺癌的机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术:多参数磁共振成像和保留神经技术的应用
Asian J Androl. 2014 Sep-Oct;16(5):715-9. doi: 10.4103/1008-682X.129942.
6
Trends in risk-group distribution and Pentafecta outcomes in patients treated with nerve-sparing, robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a 10-year low-intermediate volume single-center experience.接受保留神经、机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术治疗的患者的风险组分布和 Pentafecta 结局趋势:10 年低中度容量单中心经验。
World J Urol. 2021 Feb;39(2):389-397. doi: 10.1007/s00345-020-03206-y. Epub 2020 Apr 23.
7
Pathological confirmation of nerve-sparing types performed during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).在机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术(RARP)期间进行的神经保留类型的病理确认。
BJU Int. 2013 Mar;111(3):451-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11393.x. Epub 2012 Aug 20.
8
Quality of Preoperative Biopsy Is a Risk Factor for Positive Surgical Margins in Organ-Confined Prostate Cancer Treated with Nerve-Sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy.术前活检质量是接受保留神经机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术治疗的器官局限性前列腺癌手术切缘阳性的一个风险因素。
Urol Int. 2015;95(4):465-71. doi: 10.1159/000440666. Epub 2015 Nov 18.
9
Oncologic outcomes at 10 years following robotic radical prostatectomy.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术 10 年后的肿瘤学结果。
Eur Urol. 2015 Jun;67(6):1168-1176. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.06.025. Epub 2014 Jul 2.
10
Retzius-sparing Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Leads to Durable Improvement in Urinary Function and Quality of Life Versus Standard Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Without Compromise on Oncologic Efficacy: Single-surgeon Series and Step-by-step Guide.保留雷氏间隙的机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术与标准机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术相比,能持久改善排尿功能和生活质量,且不影响肿瘤疗效:单术者系列研究及分步指南
Eur Urol. 2021 Jun;79(6):839-857. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.05.010. Epub 2020 Jun 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Predicting the indication for adjuvant radiation therapy according to EAU guidelines among patients with high-risk prostate cancer: a novel multivariable model.根据欧洲泌尿外科学会(EAU)指南预测高危前列腺癌患者辅助放疗的指征:一种新型多变量模型。
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2025 Sep 3. doi: 10.1038/s41391-025-01018-y.
2
Impact of neurovascular bundle preservation on biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer.神经血管束保留对高危前列腺癌机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后生化复发的影响。
World J Urol. 2024 Dec 21;43(1):43. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-05363-w.
3
Retzius sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: optimizing functional results.

本文引用的文献

1
Predictors of urinary continence recovery after modified radical prostatectomy for clinically high-risk prostate cancer.临床高危前列腺癌改良根治性前列腺切除术后尿失禁恢复的预测因素
Urol J. 2015 Feb 22;12(1):2021-7.
2
RARP in high-risk prostate cancer: use of multi-parametric MRI and nerve sparing techniques.高危前列腺癌的机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术:多参数磁共振成像和保留神经技术的应用
Asian J Androl. 2014 Sep-Oct;16(5):715-9. doi: 10.4103/1008-682X.129942.
3
Annual Report to the Nation on the status of cancer, 1975-2010, featuring prevalence of comorbidity and impact on survival among persons with lung, colorectal, breast, or prostate cancer.
保留耻骨前列腺韧带的机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术:优化功能结果。
World J Urol. 2024 Jun 25;42(1):385. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-05066-2.
4
Outcomes of lateral approach in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: insights from a single-surgeon experience.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术侧入路的结果:单中心经验的见解。
J Robot Surg. 2024 Jan 13;18(1):24. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01772-y.
5
Functional Impact of Neuro-Vascular Bundle Preservation in High Risk Prostate Cancer without Compromising Oncological Outcomes: A Propensity-Modelled Analysis.保留神经血管束对高危前列腺癌的功能影响且不影响肿瘤学结局:一项倾向模型分析
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Dec 14;15(24):5839. doi: 10.3390/cancers15245839.
6
Retzius-Sparing Robotic-Assisted Prostatectomy: Technical Challenges for Surgeons and Key Prospective Refinements.保留精囊的机器人辅助前列腺切除术:外科医生面临的技术挑战及关键的前瞻性改进措施
Res Rep Urol. 2023 Dec 12;15:541-552. doi: 10.2147/RRU.S372803. eCollection 2023.
7
Erectile function, urinary continence and oncologic outcomes of neurovascular bundle sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.保留神经血管束的机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术治疗高危前列腺癌的勃起功能、尿控及肿瘤学结局:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Front Oncol. 2023 Apr 5;13:1161544. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1161544. eCollection 2023.
8
Selection of patients for nerve sparing surgery in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术中保留神经手术患者的选择
BJUI Compass. 2021 Nov 9;3(1):6-18. doi: 10.1002/bco2.115. eCollection 2022 Jan.
9
Concordance between Preoperative mpMRI and Pathological Stage and Its Influence on Nerve-Sparing Surgery in Patients with High-Risk Prostate Cancer.术前 mpMRI 与病理分期的一致性及其对高危前列腺癌患者神经保留手术的影响。
Curr Oncol. 2022 Mar 28;29(4):2385-2394. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29040193.
10
Contemporary seminal vesicle invasion rates in NCCN high-risk prostate cancer patients.当代 NCCN 高危前列腺癌患者的精囊侵犯率。
Prostate. 2022 Jun;82(10):1051-1059. doi: 10.1002/pros.24350. Epub 2022 Apr 11.
《1975-2010 年全国癌症报告:肺癌、结直肠癌、乳腺癌和前列腺癌患者合并症的流行情况及其对生存的影响》
Cancer. 2014 May 1;120(9):1290-314. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28509. Epub 2013 Dec 16.
4
EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. part 1: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent-update 2013.EAU 前列腺癌指南。第 1 部分:筛查、诊断和以治愈为目的的局部治疗——2013 年更新。
Eur Urol. 2014 Jan;65(1):124-37. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.09.046. Epub 2013 Oct 6.
5
Positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and contemporary update.根治性前列腺切除术后的阳性切缘:系统评价和当代更新。
Eur Urol. 2014 Feb;65(2):303-13. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.07.039. Epub 2013 Aug 3.
6
The role of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection in the management of high-risk prostate cancer: a systematic review.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术和盆腔淋巴结清扫术在高危前列腺癌治疗中的作用:系统评价。
Eur Urol. 2014 May;65(5):918-27. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.05.026. Epub 2013 May 18.
7
Long-term evaluation of survival, continence and potency (SCP) outcomes after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术(RARP)后生存、控尿和性功能(SCP)结局的长期评估。
BJU Int. 2013 Aug;112(3):338-45. doi: 10.1111/bju.12001. Epub 2013 Mar 7.
8
How does robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) compare with open surgery in men with high-risk prostate cancer?机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术(RARP)与开放性手术在高危前列腺癌男性中的比较如何?
BJU Int. 2013 Aug;112(4):E314-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11493.x. Epub 2013 Mar 4.
9
Retrograde versus antegrade nerve sparing during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: which is better for achieving early functional recovery?机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术时逆行与顺行神经保留:哪种方法更有利于早期功能恢复?
Eur Urol. 2013 Jan;63(1):169-77. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.09.051. Epub 2012 Sep 28.
10
Effect of a risk-stratified grade of nerve-sparing technique on early return of continence after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.风险分层神经保留技术对机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术后早期控尿功能恢复的影响。
Eur Urol. 2013 Mar;63(3):438-44. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.07.009. Epub 2012 Jul 20.