Kumar Anup, Samavedi Srinivas, Bates Anthony S, Mouraviev Vladimir, Coelho Rafael F, Rocco Bernardo, Patel Vipul R
Department of Urology, University of Central Florida College of Medicine and Global Robotics Institute, Florida Hospital-Celebration Health, Kissimmee, FL, USA.
J Robot Surg. 2017 Jun;11(2):129-138. doi: 10.1007/s11701-016-0627-3. Epub 2016 Jul 19.
D'Amico high risk prostate cancer is associated with higher incidence of extra prostatic disease. It is recommended to avoid nerve sparing in high risk patients to avoid residual cancer. We report our intermediate term oncologic and functional outcomes in patients with preoperative D'Amico high risk prostate cancer, who underwent selective nerve sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). Between Jan 2008 till June 2013, 557 patients underwent RARP for D'Amico high risk prostate cancer. The criteria for nerve sparing were as follows-complete: non palpable disease with <3 cores involvement on prostate biopsy; partial: non palpable disease with <4 cores involvement on prostate biopsy; none: clinically palpable disease with ≥4 cores involvement on prostate biopsy and intraoperative visual cues of locally advanced disease (loss of dissection planes, focal bulge of prostatic capsule). Degree of nerve sparing (NS) was graded intraoperatively by the surgeon independently at either side as side specific margins were assessed to predict subjectivity of the intraoperative judgment. Various data were collected and analyzed. Of 557 patients who underwent RARP 140 underwent complete (group 1), 358 patients underwent partial (group 2), and 59 patients underwent non-nerve-sparing procedure (group 3). There were no difference in preoperative characteristic between the groups (p = 0.678), but group 3 had higher Gleason score sum (p = 0.001), positive cores on biopsy (p = 0.001) and higher t stage (p = 0.001). Postoperatively Extra prostatic extension (p = 0.001), seminal vesicle invasion (p = 0.001), and tumor volume (p < 0.001) were higher in Group 3. Side specific positive surgical margins (PSMs) rates were higher for non-nerve-sparing compared to partial and complete nerve sparing RARP (p < 0.001; overall PSMs = 25.2 %). On univariate and multivariate analysis, nerve sparing did not affect PSMs (p > 0.05). The overall biochemical recurrence (BCR) rate at mean follow-up of 24.3 months was 19.21 %. The continence rate at 3 month was significantly higher in complete NS group in comparison to non-NS group (p = 0.020), however, this difference was not statistically significant at 1 year. Similarly, mean time to continence was significantly lower in complete NS group in comparison to non-NS group (p = 0.030). The potency rate was significantly higher and mean time to potency was significantly lower in complete NS group in comparison to non-NS group (p = 0.010 and 0.020, respectively). In high risk prostate cancer patients, selective nerve sparing during RARP, using the preoperative clinical variables (clinical stage and positive cores on biopsy) and surgeon's intraoperative perception, could provide reasonable intermediate term oncologic, functional outcomes (continence and potency) with acceptable perioperative morbidity and positive surgical margins rate. Use of these preoperative factors and surgeon's intraoperative judgment can appropriately evaluate high risk prostate cancer patients for nerve sparing RARP.
达米科高危前列腺癌与前列腺外疾病的较高发生率相关。建议对高危患者避免保留神经以避免残留癌。我们报告了术前诊断为达米科高危前列腺癌且接受选择性保留神经机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术(RARP)患者的中期肿瘤学和功能结果。2008年1月至2013年6月期间,557例患者因达米科高危前列腺癌接受了RARP。保留神经的标准如下:完全保留:前列腺活检时无可触及病变且累及芯数<3个;部分保留:前列腺活检时无可触及病变且累及芯数<4个;不保留:临床可触及病变且前列腺活检累及芯数≥4个以及术中提示局部进展性疾病的视觉线索(解剖层面消失、前列腺包膜局灶性隆起)。由于术中对侧方切缘进行评估以预测术中判断的主观性,因此由外科医生独立对保留神经(NS)的程度在两侧进行术中分级。收集并分析了各种数据。在557例行RARP的患者中,140例接受了完全保留神经(第1组),358例接受了部分保留神经(第2组),59例接受了不保留神经手术(第3组)。各组术前特征无差异(p = 0.678),但第3组的Gleason评分总和更高(p = 0.001)、活检阳性芯数更多(p = 0.001)且t分期更高(p = 0.001)。术后第3组的前列腺外扩展(p = 0.001)、精囊侵犯(p = 0.001)和肿瘤体积(p < 0.001)更高。与部分和完全保留神经的RARP相比,不保留神经的手术侧方阳性手术切缘(PSM)率更高(p < 0.001;总体PSM = 25.2%)。单因素和多因素分析显示,保留神经不影响PSM(p > 0.05)。平均随访24.3个月时的总体生化复发(BCR)率为19.21%。完全保留神经组3个月时的控尿率显著高于不保留神经组(p = 0.020),然而,1年时这种差异无统计学意义。同样,完全保留神经组达到控尿的平均时间显著短于不保留神经组(p = 0.030)。完全保留神经组的勃起功能恢复率显著更高且达到勃起功能恢复的平均时间显著更短,与不保留神经组相比(分别为p = 0.010和0.020)。在高危前列腺癌患者中,在RARP期间根据术前临床变量(临床分期和活检阳性芯数)以及外科医生的术中判断进行选择性保留神经,可提供合理的中期肿瘤学和功能结果(控尿和勃起功能),围手术期发病率和阳性手术切缘率可接受。使用这些术前因素和外科医生的术中判断可适当评估高危前列腺癌患者是否适合行保留神经的RARP。