Suppr超能文献

游离皮瓣重建术中使用血管闭合装置进行微血管吻合:13 年经验。

Microvascular anastomosis using the vascular closure device in free flap reconstructive surgery: A 13-year experience.

机构信息

Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2012 Feb;65(2):195-200. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2011.08.041. Epub 2011 Oct 10.

Abstract

The achievement of patency of the microvascular anastomosis in free flap surgery is dependent on a number of factors, central to which is atraumatic handling of the vessel lumen, and intimal apposition. Initial laboratory studies demonstrating the superiority of the non-penetrating vascular closure staple (VCS - Anastoclip ®) were followed by our report in 1999 on a series of free flaps. There is still a paucity of data in the literature on the use of non-penetrating devices for microvascular anastomosis, and our review gives evidence to support the routine use of the VCS in microsurgical free flap surgery. We now report on its successful use over a thirteen year period in 819 free flap reconstructions. Our data indicates the VCS device to be as effective as sutured anastomoses in free tissue transfer surgery. There is also statistically significant data (Barnard's Exact Test) to demonstrate a higher vascular patency rate of the VCS device over sutured anastomoses when sub group analysis is performed. 'Take-back' revision rates were lower amongst flaps that employed VCS use. For arterial anastomoses, this equated to 3/654(0.05%) vs 4/170(2.4%) with hand-sewn anastomoses (p = 0.02). Similarly, for venous anastomoses the 'take-back' revision rate was 7/661(1.1%) vs 8/165(4.8%) with hand-sewn anastomoses (p = 0.003). Furthermore, the major advantage of the VCS is reduction in anastomosis time, from approximately 25 min per anastomosis for sutures to between five and 10 min for staples.

摘要

游离皮瓣移植术中吻合口通畅的实现取决于许多因素,其中核心的两个因素是对血管腔的无创伤处理和内膜贴合。最初的实验室研究表明非穿透性血管闭合钉(VCS- Anastoclip®)具有优越性,随后我们在 1999 年报告了一系列游离皮瓣。文献中关于非穿透性器械在微血管吻合中的应用仍然缺乏数据,我们的综述提供了支持常规使用 VCS 进行显微血管游离皮瓣手术的证据。我们现在报告了在 819 例游离皮瓣重建中,该器械成功使用了 13 年。我们的数据表明,VCS 装置在游离组织移植手术中与缝合吻合一样有效。当进行亚组分析时,VCS 装置的血管通畅率也具有统计学意义(Barnard 精确检验)。采用 VCS 的皮瓣“收回”修订率较低。对于动脉吻合,VCS 组为 3/654(0.05%),而手工吻合组为 4/170(2.4%)(p=0.02)。同样,对于静脉吻合,VCS 组的“收回”修订率为 7/661(1.1%),而手工吻合组为 8/165(4.8%)(p=0.003)。此外,VCS 的主要优势在于减少吻合时间,从每吻合口缝合约 25 分钟减少到使用吻合钉的 5 到 10 分钟。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验