Suppr超能文献

游离皮瓣重建中使用非穿透性血管夹的临床经验。

Clinical experience with non-penetrating vascular clips in free-flap reconstructions.

作者信息

Zeebregts C, Acosta R, Bölander L, van Schilfgaarde R, Jakobsson O

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University Hospital Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Br J Plast Surg. 2002 Mar;55(2):105-10. doi: 10.1054/bjps.2001.3762.

Abstract

To date, the gold standard for performing a microvascular anastomosis has been the penetrating suture with attached needle. During the last two decades, non-penetrating techniques have been introduced, including the Unilink system for end-to-end anastomoses, and the VCS clip-applier system for both end-to-end and end-to-side anastomoses. The aim of this study was to compare the results of different techniques used to create microvascular anastomoses in free-flap reconstructions. Between January 1995 and October 1999, we performed 474 microvascular anastomoses in 216 consecutive free-tissue transfers. The anastomosis techniques included manual sutures (42%), Unilink rings (34%) and VCS clips (24%). Seven combined sutured-clipped anastomoses were excluded from further analysis. The mean anastomotic time when rings were applied was significantly shorter than when using clips (P 0.0001) or sutures (P 0.0001). Venous anastomoses using clips took less time than those using sutures (P 0.05). There were 19 anastomotic failures, all of which lead to early flap failure. Ten flaps were salvaged by early reoperation; nine flaps were lost. Three more flaps were lost as a result of other causes, bringing the flap survival rate down to 94.4%. Early flap failure was caused by failure of the arterial anastomosis in eight cases; all of them were sutured (these represented 5% of all arterial anastomoses with sutures). None of the clipped arterial anastomoses failed. Early flap failure was caused by failure of the venous anastomosis in 11 patients. Three of these anastomoses were sutured (representing 6% of all venous anastomoses with sutures), seven were anastomosed with rings (representing 5% of all venous anastomoses with rings) and one was clipped (representing 2% of all venous anastomoses with clips). Both the VCS clip-applier system and the Unilink system are easy to handle and allow fast microvascular anastomoses without intraluminal penetration. The patency rate of clipped vessels is at least as good as the patency rates of vessels anastomosed using sutures or rings.

摘要

迄今为止,进行微血管吻合的金标准一直是带针的穿透性缝合。在过去二十年中,已引入了非穿透技术,包括用于端端吻合的Unilink系统,以及用于端端和端侧吻合的VCS夹应用系统。本研究的目的是比较在游离皮瓣重建中用于创建微血管吻合的不同技术的结果。1995年1月至1999年10月期间,我们在216例连续的游离组织移植中进行了474次微血管吻合。吻合技术包括手工缝合(42%)、Unilink环(34%)和VCS夹(24%)。七例联合缝合夹闭吻合被排除在进一步分析之外。应用环时的平均吻合时间明显短于使用夹子(P<0.0001)或缝合(P<0.0001)时。使用夹子进行静脉吻合比使用缝合所需时间少(P<0.05)。有19例吻合失败,所有这些均导致早期皮瓣失败。十例皮瓣通过早期再次手术挽救;九例皮瓣丢失。另有三例皮瓣因其他原因丢失,使皮瓣存活率降至94.4%。早期皮瓣失败在八例中是由动脉吻合失败引起;所有这些均为缝合(这些占所有缝合动脉吻合的5%)。夹闭的动脉吻合无一失败。早期皮瓣失败在11例患者中是由静脉吻合失败引起。这些吻合中有三例为缝合(占所有缝合静脉吻合的6%),七例为用环吻合(占所有用环静脉吻合的5%),一例为夹闭(占所有夹闭静脉吻合的2%)。VCS夹应用系统和Unilink系统都易于操作,并且无需腔内穿透即可实现快速微血管吻合。夹闭血管的通畅率至少与使用缝合或环吻合的血管通畅率一样好。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验