• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

冲击速度和试件刚度对重量控制咀嚼模拟器中接触力的影响。

Effect of impact velocity and specimen stiffness on contact forces in a weight-controlled chewing simulator.

机构信息

Department of Prosthodontics, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, Heidelberg, Germany.

出版信息

Dent Mater. 2011 Dec;27(12):1267-72. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2011.09.007. Epub 2011 Oct 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.dental.2011.09.007
PMID:21993014
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Chewing simulators are used for preclinical evaluation of newly developed dental restorative materials. To guarantee the independence of test conditions, contact forces during chewing simulation should be independent of the specimen. Because of its mode of operation, i.e., impact of an antagonist, this requirement is not met for a widely used chewing simulator (Willytec/SD Mechatronik, Feldkirchen-Westerham, Germany). This study was therefore intended to clarify the extent to which specimen stiffness affects maximum contact force at different impact velocities. Possible differences between the forces in the eight test chambers were also of interest.

METHODS

From each of five dental materials differing in Young's modulus, eight cylindrical disks were manufactured and embedded in specimen holders. Alumina spheres were used as antagonists. During chewing simulations with different impact velocities and dental materials, vertical acceleration was recorded and contact forces were estimated on the basis of these measurements.

RESULTS

Specimen stiffness and impact velocity had a substantial effect on maximum contact force. The force overshoot relative to the static load ranged from 4% for small specimen stiffness and low impact velocity to values greater than 200% for high specimen stiffness and high impact velocity. Large differences between the chambers were also detected.

SIGNIFICANCE

Weight-controlled chewing simulations should be performed either with a low impact velocity or with a spring-damper system (placed between mass and specimen) which efficiently reduces the effects of contact force variation. Influence of specimen stiffness on contact forces must be considered at data interpretation.

摘要

目的

咀嚼模拟器用于新开发的牙科修复材料的临床前评估。为了保证测试条件的独立性,咀嚼模拟过程中的接触力不应受样本的影响。由于其操作模式,即对咬合力的冲击,这一要求对于广泛使用的咀嚼模拟器(威利泰克/SD Mechatronik,德国费尔德基兴-韦斯特哈默)来说无法满足。因此,本研究旨在阐明样本刚度在不同冲击速度下对最大接触力的影响程度。同时,还研究了八个测试腔室之间的力差异。

方法

从杨氏模量不同的五种牙科材料中,每个材料制造了八个圆柱形圆盘并嵌入样本固定器中。氧化铝球作为对抗物。在不同冲击速度和牙科材料的咀嚼模拟过程中,记录垂直加速度,并根据这些测量值估算接触力。

结果

样本刚度和冲击速度对最大接触力有很大影响。相对于静载荷的力过冲范围从低样本刚度和低冲击速度时的 4%到高样本刚度和高冲击速度时的 200%以上。还检测到腔室之间存在较大差异。

意义

重量控制的咀嚼模拟应使用低冲击速度或使用弹簧阻尼系统(放置在质量和样本之间)进行,这可以有效地减少接触力变化的影响。在数据解释时必须考虑样本刚度对接触力的影响。

相似文献

1
Effect of impact velocity and specimen stiffness on contact forces in a weight-controlled chewing simulator.冲击速度和试件刚度对重量控制咀嚼模拟器中接触力的影响。
Dent Mater. 2011 Dec;27(12):1267-72. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2011.09.007. Epub 2011 Oct 10.
2
In vitro evaluation of a mechanical testing chewing simulator.一种机械测试咀嚼模拟器的体外评估
Dent Mater. 2009 Apr;25(4):494-9. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2008.09.010. Epub 2008 Nov 25.
3
The influence of different core material on the FEA-determined stress distribution in dental crowns.不同核心材料对有限元分析确定的牙冠应力分布的影响。
Dent Mater. 2006 Mar;22(3):234-42. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2005.04.034. Epub 2005 Aug 11.
4
Improved single- and multi-contact life-time testing of dental restorative materials using key characteristics of the human masticatory system and a force/position-controlled robotic dental wear simulator.使用人类咀嚼系统的关键特征和力/位置控制的机器人牙科磨损模拟器改进牙科修复材料的单接触和多接触寿命测试。
Bioinspir Biomim. 2012 Mar;7(1):016002. doi: 10.1088/1748-3182/7/1/016002. Epub 2011 Dec 8.
5
Wear testing of composite, gold, porcelain, and enamel opposing a removable cobalt-chromium partial denture alloy.复合树脂、金、瓷和牙釉质与可摘钴铬合金局部义齿相对时的磨损测试。
J Prosthodont. 2009 Jul;18(5):421-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2009.00455.x. Epub 2009 Apr 3.
6
How to qualify and validate wear simulation devices and methods.如何对磨损模拟设备和方法进行鉴定与验证。
Dent Mater. 2006 Aug;22(8):712-34. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2006.02.002. Epub 2006 Mar 30.
7
Wear performance of substructure ceramics and veneering porcelains.底层陶瓷和饰面瓷的佩戴性能。
Dent Mater. 2011 Aug;27(8):796-804. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2011.04.001. Epub 2011 Apr 27.
8
Adherence of chewing gum to dental restorative materials.
Am J Dent. 1995 Jun;8(3):137-9.
9
Influence of superstructure materials on strain around an implant under 2 loading conditions: a technical investigation.两种加载条件下上部结构材料对种植体周围应变的影响:一项技术研究。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004 Sep-Oct;19(5):735-42.
10
Shock-absorbing behavior of five restorative materials used on implants.用于种植体的五种修复材料的减震行为。
Int J Prosthodont. 1991 May-Jun;4(3):282-91.

引用本文的文献

1
Temporomandibular joint biomechanics and equine incisor occlusal plane maintenance.颞下颌关节生物力学与马切牙咬合平面维持
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023 Sep 20;11:1249316. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1249316. eCollection 2023.
2
Monolithic zirconia crowns: effect of thickness reduction on fatigue behavior and failure load.整体式氧化锆全冠:厚度减小对疲劳行为和破坏载荷的影响。
J Adv Prosthodont. 2021 Oct;13(5):269-280. doi: 10.4047/jap.2021.13.5.269. Epub 2021 Oct 27.
3
Development of a biomechanical model for dynamic occlusal stress analysis.
建立用于动态咬合应力分析的生物力学模型。
Int J Oral Sci. 2021 Sep 8;13(1):29. doi: 10.1038/s41368-021-00133-5.
4
Systematic review of chewing simulators: Reality and reproducibility of studies.咀嚼模拟器的系统评价:研究的真实性与可重复性
J Clin Exp Dent. 2020 Dec 1;12(12):e1189-e1195. doi: 10.4317/jced.57279. eCollection 2020 Dec.
5
The flexural strength of CAD/CAM polymer crowns and the effect of artificial ageing on the fracture resistance of CAD/CAM polymer and ceramic single crowns.CAD/CAM 聚合物冠的弯曲强度和人工老化对 CAD/CAM 聚合物和陶瓷单冠抗 fracture 性能的影响。
J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2019 Dec 23;31(1):9. doi: 10.1007/s10856-019-6347-2.