Department of Bioengineering, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634, USA.
Biomaterials. 2012 Jan;33(1):1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.09.027. Epub 2011 Oct 10.
Percutaneous heart valves are revolutionizing valve replacement surgery by offering a less invasive treatment option for high-risk patient populations who have previously been denied the traditional open chest procedure. Percutaneous valves need to be crimped to accommodate a small-diameter catheter during deployment, and they must then open to the size of heart valve. Thus the material used must be strong and possess elastic recoil for this application. Most percutaneous valves utilize bovine pericardium as a material of choice. One possible method to reduce the device delivery diameter is to utilize a thin, highly elastic tissue. Here we investigated porcine vena cava as an alternative to bovine pericardium for percutaneous valve application. We compared the structural, mechanical, and in vivo properties of porcine vena cava to those of bovine pericardium. While the extracellular matrix fibers of pericardium are randomly oriented, the vena cava contains highly aligned collagen and elastin fibers that impart strength to the vessel in the circumferential direction and elasticity in the longitudinal direction. Moreover, the vena cava contains a greater proportion of elastin, whereas the pericardium matrix is mainly composed of collagen. Due to its high elastin content, the vena cava is significantly less stiff than the pericardium, even after crosslinking with glutaraldehyde. Furthermore, the vena cava's mechanical compliance is preserved after compression under forces similar to those exerted by a stent, whereas pericardium is significantly stiffened by this process. Bovine pericardium also showed surface cracks observed by scanning electron microscopy after crimping that were not seen in vena cava tissue. Additionally, the vena cava exhibited reduced calcification (46.64 ± 8.15 μg Ca/mg tissue) as compared to the pericardium (86.79 ± 10.34 μg/mg). These results suggest that the vena cava may provide enhanced leaflet flexibility, tissue resilience, and tissue integrity in percutaneous heart valves, ultimately reducing the device profile while improving the durability of these valves.
经皮心脏瓣膜通过为高风险患者群体提供一种侵入性较小的治疗选择,从而彻底改变了瓣膜置换手术,这些患者先前被拒绝接受传统的开胸手术。经皮瓣膜在部署过程中需要卷曲以适应小直径导管,然后必须打开至心脏瓣膜的大小。因此,用于该应用的材料必须具有高强度和弹性回复力。大多数经皮瓣膜都使用牛心包作为首选材料。一种减小器械输送直径的可能方法是使用薄的、高弹性的组织。在这里,我们研究了猪腔静脉作为牛心包的替代物,用于经皮瓣膜应用。我们比较了猪腔静脉与牛心包的结构、力学和体内性能。虽然心包的细胞外基质纤维是随机定向的,但腔静脉含有高度排列的胶原和弹性纤维,赋予血管在圆周方向上的强度和在纵向方向上的弹性。此外,腔静脉含有更大比例的弹性蛋白,而心包基质主要由胶原组成。由于其高弹性蛋白含量,即使在用戊二醛交联后,腔静脉也明显比心包柔软。此外,腔静脉的机械顺应性在类似于支架施加的力下压缩后得以保留,而心包在这个过程中明显变硬。扫描电子显微镜还观察到,在用戊二醛交联后,牛心包出现了表面裂纹,而腔静脉组织中则没有出现这种情况。此外,与心包相比,腔静脉的钙化程度降低(46.64±8.15μg Ca/mg 组织)。这些结果表明,腔静脉可能为经皮心脏瓣膜提供增强的瓣叶柔韧性、组织弹性和组织完整性,最终减小器械轮廓,同时提高这些瓣膜的耐用性。