Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Nippon Medical School, 1-1-5 Sendagi Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8603, Japan.
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2012 Apr;36(2):387-95. doi: 10.1007/s00266-011-9821-x. Epub 2011 Oct 13.
The usual hypertrophic scar reconstruction methods such as Z- and W-plasties can leave noticeable scars and involve excessive normal skin excision, particularly in long linear hypertrophic scars longer than 10 cm. Thus, we invented and applied the small-wave incision method for patients with linear hypertrophic scars.
A total of 40 patients with linear hypertrophic scars were included in this study. The patients were randomly assigned to the linear incision group (n = 20) or the small-wave incision group (n = 20). All scars were mildly hypertrophic, longer than 10 cm, and located in the lower abdominal/suprapubic region. They occurred after Cesarean section or gynecological or abdominal surgery. Patient age and sex, the cause of the scar, and the preoperative and postoperative sizes of the scar were recorded. Postoperative scar size and recurrence were evaluated for 18 months. Mathematical comparisons were also made to multiple linear incision, Z-plasty, planimetric Z-plasty, and W-plasty.
Postoperative recurrence was 40 and 15% in linear and small-wave groups, respectively (P = 0.77). The main risk factor for recurrence was postoperative size (P = 0.043). Mathematical comparisons revealed that the small-wave method can achieve the same release of tension with the least normal skin excision while making the scar irregular via an accordion effect.
The small-wave method can meet both the functional and the cosmetic requirements of long linear hypertrophic scar reconstruction while reducing complication risks.
Z 成形术和 W 成形术等常见的增生性瘢痕重建方法会留下明显的瘢痕,并涉及过多的正常皮肤切除,尤其是在长度超过 10cm 的长线性增生性瘢痕中。因此,我们为线性增生性瘢痕患者发明并应用了小波浪切口法。
本研究共纳入 40 例线性增生性瘢痕患者。患者被随机分为线性切口组(n=20)或小波浪切口组(n=20)。所有瘢痕均为轻度增生性,长度超过 10cm,位于下腹部/耻骨区。它们是在剖宫产或妇科或腹部手术后产生的。记录患者年龄和性别、瘢痕的原因、瘢痕术前和术后的大小。术后 18 个月评估瘢痕大小和复发情况。还对多个线性切口、Z 成形术、平面 Z 成形术和 W 成形术进行了数学比较。
线性和小波浪组的术后复发率分别为 40%和 15%(P=0.77)。复发的主要危险因素是术后大小(P=0.043)。数学比较显示,小波浪法可以在最小的正常皮肤切除下达到相同的张力释放,同时通过风琴效应使瘢痕不规则。
小波浪法可以满足长线性增生性瘢痕重建的功能和美容要求,同时降低并发症风险。