Cardiology Division, Department of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, China.
Clin Cardiol. 2011 Oct;34(10):628-32. doi: 10.1002/clc.20958.
Underlying mechanisms of PR-interval prolongation leading to increased risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes, including atrial fibrillation, are unclear. This study aims to investigate the relation between PR interval and changes in vascular function.
We hypothesize that there exists an intermediate pathological stage between electrocardiographic PR prolongation and adverse cardiovascular outcomes, which could be reflected by changes in surrogate measurements of vascular function.
We recruited 88 healthy subjects (mean age 57.5 ± 9.8 y, 46% male) from a community-based health screening program who had no history of cardiovascular disease or diabetes mellitus. PR interval was determined from a resting 12-lead electrocardiogram. Vascular function was noninvasively assessed by flow-mediated dilation (FMD) using high-resolution ultrasound and brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (PWV) using a vascular profiling system.
Only 3 subjects had a PR-interval length longer than the conventional cutoff of 200 ms. The PR-interval length was associated inversely with FMD (Pearson r = -0.30, P = 0.004) and positively with PWV (r = 0.40, P < 0.001). Adjusting for potential confounders, increased PR-interval length by each 25 ms was independently associated with reduced FMD by -1 unit (absolute %, B = -0.04 [95% confidence interval: -0.080 to -0.002, P = 0.040)] and increased PWV by +103 cm/second (B = +4.1 [95% confidence interval: 0.6-7.6, P = 0.023]).
This study shows that PR-interval length, even in the conventionally normal range, is independently associated with endothelial dysfunction and increased arterial stiffness in healthy subjects free of atherosclerotic disease. This suggests the presence of a systemic, intermediate pathologic stage of the vasculature in PR prolongation before clinically manifest cardiovascular events, and could represent a mediating mechanism.
导致不良心血管结局(包括房颤)风险增加的 PR 间期延长的潜在机制尚不清楚。本研究旨在探讨 PR 间期与血管功能变化之间的关系。
我们假设在心电图 PR 延长和不良心血管结局之间存在一个中间病理阶段,这可以通过血管功能的替代测量值的变化来反映。
我们从社区健康筛查计划中招募了 88 名无心血管疾病或糖尿病史的健康受试者(平均年龄 57.5 ± 9.8 岁,46%为男性)。PR 间期由静息 12 导联心电图确定。血管功能通过使用高分辨率超声的血流介导的扩张(FMD)和使用血管分析系统的肱踝脉搏波速度(PWV)进行无创评估。
只有 3 名受试者的 PR 间期长度超过传统的 200ms 截断值。PR 间期长度与 FMD 呈负相关(Pearson r = -0.30,P = 0.004),与 PWV 呈正相关(r = 0.40,P < 0.001)。调整潜在混杂因素后,PR 间期每增加 25ms 与 FMD 降低 1 个单位(绝对值,B = -0.04 [95%置信区间:-0.080 至 -0.002,P = 0.040])和 PWV 增加 103cm/秒(B = +4.1 [95%置信区间:0.6-7.6,P = 0.023])独立相关。
本研究表明,PR 间期长度,即使在传统的正常范围内,也与无动脉粥样硬化疾病的健康受试者的内皮功能障碍和动脉僵硬度增加独立相关。这表明在临床上明显的心血管事件之前,PR 延长存在一个系统性的、中间的血管病理阶段,这可能是一种介导机制。