Suppr超能文献

无神论者不在散兵坑里:(而非反对)来世信仰缓冲无神论者对死亡凸显效应的论据。

No atheists in foxholes: arguments for (but not against) afterlife belief buffers mortality salience effects for atheists.

机构信息

Psychology Department, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA.

出版信息

Br J Soc Psychol. 2012 Jun;51(2):385-92. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02058.x. Epub 2011 Oct 13.

Abstract

Terror management theory (TMT) posits that people cope with mortality concerns via symbolic immortality (e.g., secular cultural beliefs that outlast death) and/or literal immortality (afterlife belief). However, what happens when these two forms of immortality conflict, as in atheism? Would atheists' mortality concerns be better assuaged by affirming an afterlife, or by affirming their literal immortality-denying worldview? Drawing on an untested TMT hypothesis, we predicted that atheists would be buffered from mortality concerns if their atheistic worldview - no life after death - was challenged, but not if it was supported. Results confirmed the hypothesis and were also found for theists and agnostics. These findings support TMT's claim that literal immortality is of paramount importance in ameliorating death concerns.

摘要

死亡恐惧管理理论(TMT)认为,人们通过象征性的永生(例如,超越死亡的世俗文化信仰)和/或字面意义上的永生(来世信仰)来应对死亡担忧。然而,当这两种形式的永生发生冲突时,例如在无神论中,会发生什么?无神论者的死亡担忧会通过肯定来世得到更好的缓解,还是通过肯定他们否认字面意义上永生的世界观得到更好的缓解?根据一个未经检验的 TMT 假设,我们预测,如果无神论者的世界观——死后没有生命——受到挑战,他们的死亡担忧就会得到缓冲,但如果这种世界观得到支持,就不会得到缓冲。研究结果证实了这一假设,对于有神论者和不可知论者也是如此。这些发现支持了 TMT 的主张,即字面意义上的永生对于缓解死亡担忧至关重要。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验