Suppr超能文献

范畴组织对言语工作记忆的影响。

The influence of categorical organization on verbal working memory.

机构信息

University of Urbino "Carlo Bo", Italy.

出版信息

Br J Dev Psychol. 2011 Nov;29(Pt 4):942-60. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-835X.2011.02030.x. Epub 2011 Mar 24.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to show the positive effects of categorical organization on verbal working memory (WM), in a modified version of a double task, such as the Listening Span Test (LST) (Daneman & Carpenter, 1980). Two experiments were performed comparing sentences with the typical definitional format (i.e., superordinate term, copula, and specification) to sentences simply describing objects or events. The results of the two experiments, with participants from children aged 6 to adults, revealed that word recall was better in Categorical sentences than in Descriptive sentences and are interpreted in terms of retrieval facilitation, due to pre-existing organization in semantic memory, at least from the age of 8 onwards. Recall performance was also better with sentences giving True statements than those giving False statements. Furthermore, Categorical False sentences are more effective in enhancing recall than Descriptive False sentences since they violate well-established semantic expectations. Such variables were also found to act among participants with a lower WM span, by this confirming that pre-existing organized information may compensate for less efficient WM.

摘要

本研究旨在展示分类组织对言语工作记忆(WM)的积极影响,方法是对双重任务(如听力跨度测试(LST)(Daneman 和 Carpenter,1980))进行修改。进行了两项实验,比较了具有典型定义格式(即上位词、系动词和说明)的句子与简单描述对象或事件的句子。这两项实验的结果来自年龄在 6 岁至成人的参与者,表明在分类句子中单词回忆要好于描述性句子,这可以根据语义记忆中预先存在的组织来解释,至少从 8 岁开始就是如此。对于给出真实陈述的句子,回忆表现也好于给出虚假陈述的句子。此外,由于违背了既定的语义期望,分类错误句子比描述性错误句子更能有效地提高回忆能力。这些变量也在 WM 跨度较小的参与者中起作用,这证实了预先存在的组织信息可以弥补 WM 效率较低的问题。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验