• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国住院治疗的疾病患者在出院后 180 天内静脉血栓栓塞风险和预防使用的获益。

Risk of venous thromboembolism and benefits of prophylaxis use in hospitalized medically ill US patients up to 180 days post-hospital discharge.

机构信息

STATinMED Research and The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

出版信息

Thromb J. 2011 Oct 13;9(1):15. doi: 10.1186/1477-9560-9-15.

DOI:10.1186/1477-9560-9-15
PMID:21995820
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3215634/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To assess the incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and bleeding events with or without thromboprophylaxis and the associated costs in a cohort of medically ill patients in both in-hospital and outpatient settings.

METHODS

A large hospital drug database and linked outpatient files were used to identify patients eligible for this analysis, based on demographic and clinical characteristics.

RESULTS

Among 11,135 patients identified, 1592 (14.30%) were admitted with chronic heart failure, 1684 (15.12%) with thromboembolic stroke, 3834 (34.43%) with severe lung disease, 1658 (14.89%) with acute infection, and 2367 (21.26%) with cancer. Of the 11,135 patients, 5932 received anticoagulant therapy at some point during their hospitalization and until 30 days after discharge. VTE events occurred in 1.30% of patients who received anticoagulant prophylaxis versus 2.99% of patients who did not. Risk-adjusted total healthcare costs for patients with a VTE or major or minor bleeding event were significantly higher than for those without events (VTE: $52,157 ± 24,389 vs $24,164 ± 11,418; major bleeding: $33,656 ± 18,196 vs $24,765 ± 11,974; minor bleeding: $33,690 ± 14,398 vs $23,610 ± 11,873). In a multivariate analysis, appropriate anticoagulant prophylaxis use was significantly associated with a reduced risk of clinical VTE, compared with no anticoagulant use (hazard ratio: 0.37). Patients admitted with thromboembolic stroke were less likely to have a VTE than patients admitted with cancer (hazard ratio: 0.42).

CONCLUSIONS

In this analysis, VTE and major bleeding event rates were lower for patients who received prophylaxis compared with those who did not. Prophylaxis use was associated with lower healthcare costs.

摘要

背景

评估患有内科疾病的住院和门诊患者发生静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)和出血事件的发生率,以及有无预防性使用抗栓药物及其相关成本。

方法

利用大型医院药物数据库和相关门诊文件,根据人口统计学和临床特征,确定符合本分析条件的患者。

结果

在确定的 11135 名患者中,1592 名(14.30%)因慢性心力衰竭入院,1684 名(15.12%)因血栓栓塞性脑卒中入院,3834 名(34.43%)因严重肺部疾病入院,1658 名(14.89%)因急性感染入院,2367 名(21.26%)因癌症入院。在这 11135 名患者中,5932 名患者在住院期间或出院后 30 天内接受了抗凝治疗。接受抗凝预防的患者 VTE 发生率为 1.30%,未接受抗凝预防的患者 VTE 发生率为 2.99%。发生 VTE 或大出血或小出血事件的患者的总医疗保健费用明显高于未发生事件的患者(VTE:52157 美元±24389 美元,33656 美元±18196 美元,33690 美元±14398 美元)。多变量分析显示,与未使用抗凝药物相比,适当使用抗凝预防药物可显著降低临床 VTE 风险(风险比:0.37)。与癌症患者相比,因血栓栓塞性脑卒中入院的患者发生 VTE 的可能性较低(风险比:0.42)。

结论

在本分析中,与未接受预防治疗的患者相比,接受预防治疗的患者 VTE 和大出血事件的发生率较低。预防治疗的使用与较低的医疗保健成本相关。

相似文献

1
Risk of venous thromboembolism and benefits of prophylaxis use in hospitalized medically ill US patients up to 180 days post-hospital discharge.美国住院治疗的疾病患者在出院后 180 天内静脉血栓栓塞风险和预防使用的获益。
Thromb J. 2011 Oct 13;9(1):15. doi: 10.1186/1477-9560-9-15.
2
Thromboembolism prophylaxis in medical inpatients: effect on outcomes and costs.内科住院患者的血栓栓塞预防:对结局和成本的影响。
Am J Manag Care. 2012 Jun;18(6):294-302.
3
Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis and clinical consequences in medically ill patients.静脉血栓栓塞症预防与医学疾病患者的临床后果。
Am J Ther. 2013 Mar-Apr;20(2):132-42. doi: 10.1097/MJT.0b013e31826910dd.
4
Extended Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Medically Ill Patients: An NATF Anticoagulation Action Initiative.内科疾病患者的静脉血栓栓塞症延伸预防:NATF 抗凝行动倡议。
Am J Med. 2020 May;133 Suppl 1:1-27. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2019.12.001.
5
Post-Discharge Prophylaxis With Rivaroxaban Reduces Fatal and Major Thromboembolic Events in Medically Ill Patients.利伐沙班用于出院后预防可降低重症患者的致死性和主要血栓栓塞事件风险。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Jun 30;75(25):3140-3147. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.04.071.
6
Thromboprophylaxis patterns, risk factors, and outcomes of care in the medically ill patient population.医学疾病患者人群中的血栓预防模式、风险因素和护理结果。
Thromb Res. 2013 Nov;132(5):520-6. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2013.08.013. Epub 2013 Aug 28.
7
Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis and Risk in the Inpatient and Outpatient Continuum of Care Among Hospitalized Acutely Ill Patients in the US: A Retrospective Analysis.美国住院急性病患者住院和门诊连续护理中的静脉血栓栓塞预防和风险:一项回顾性分析。
Adv Ther. 2019 Jan;36(1):59-71. doi: 10.1007/s12325-018-0846-2. Epub 2018 Dec 12.
8
Pharmacologic prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism and 30-day outcomes among older patients hospitalized with heart failure: an analysis from the ADHERE national registry linked to Medicare claims.心力衰竭住院老年患者的静脉血栓栓塞症药物预防和 30 天结局:来自 ADHERE 国家登记处与医疗保险索赔链接的分析。
Clin Cardiol. 2011 Nov;34(11):682-8. doi: 10.1002/clc.20986. Epub 2011 Nov 6.
9
Extended thromboprophylaxis in the acutely ill medical patient after hospitalization - a paradigm shift in post-discharge thromboprophylaxis.急性病住院患者出院后的延长血栓预防——出院后血栓预防的范式转变。
Hosp Pract (1995). 2018 Feb;46(1):5-15. doi: 10.1080/21548331.2018.1410053. Epub 2017 Nov 30.
10
Duration of venous thromboembolism risk across a continuum in medically ill hospitalized patients.患有内科疾病的住院患者静脉血栓栓塞风险的连续变化过程。
J Hosp Med. 2012 Mar;7(3):231-8. doi: 10.1002/jhm.1002. Epub 2011 Dec 21.

引用本文的文献

1
D-dimer Levels in Acute, Medically Ill, Hospitalized Patients: A Large, Prospective, Multicenter Study in the United States.美国急性内科疾病住院患者的D-二聚体水平:一项大型前瞻性多中心研究
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2025 Jan-Dec;31:10760296251320406. doi: 10.1177/10760296251320406.
2
Safety and effectiveness of thromboprophylaxis use in hospitalized elderly medical patients at a Saudi tertiary care center.沙特一家三级医疗中心住院老年内科患者使用血栓预防措施的安全性和有效性。
Saudi Pharm J. 2021 May;29(5):456-461. doi: 10.1016/j.jsps.2021.04.008. Epub 2021 Apr 28.
3
Impact of a clinical pharmacist on ultrasound-guided venous thromboembolism screening in hospitalized COVID-19 patients: a pilot prospective study.临床药剂师对住院COVID-19患者超声引导下静脉血栓栓塞筛查的影响:一项前瞻性试点研究。
J Pharm Health Care Sci. 2021 Apr 1;7(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s40780-021-00201-2.
4
Low venous thromboembolism incidence in high risk medical patients in an Israeli hospital. Can risk assessment be extrapolated to different populations?以色列某医院高危内科患者静脉血栓栓塞症发生率低。风险评估能否外推至不同人群?
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 6;15(7):e0235683. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235683. eCollection 2020.
5
Emergence of institutional antithrombotic protocols for coronavirus 2019.2019冠状病毒病机构性抗血栓形成方案的出现。
Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2020 Jun 12;4(4):510-517. doi: 10.1002/rth2.12358. eCollection 2020 May.
6
A Prospective Observational Cohort of Clinical Outcomes in Medical Inpatients prescribed Pharmacological Thromboprophylaxis Using Different Clinical Risk Assessment Models(COMPT RAMs).采用不同临床风险评估模型(COMPT RAMs)对住院患者进行药物性血栓预防治疗的前瞻性观察性队列研究的临床结局。
Sci Rep. 2019 Dec 4;9(1):18366. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-54842-3.
7
Hospital-associated venous thromboembolism in pediatrics: a systematic review and meta-analysis of risk factors and risk-assessment models.儿科医院相关静脉血栓栓塞症:危险因素及风险评估模型的系统评价与荟萃分析
Haematologica. 2015 Aug;100(8):1045-50. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2015.123455. Epub 2015 May 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical and economic outcomes in patients at risk of venous thromboembolism receiving appropriate enoxaparin or unfractionated heparin prophylaxis.接受适当依诺肝素或普通肝素预防的静脉血栓栓塞风险患者的临床和经济结局
Thromb Haemost. 2009 Aug;102(2):321-6. doi: 10.1160/TH09-03-0147.
2
Prevention of venous thromboembolism: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition).静脉血栓栓塞的预防:美国胸科医师学会循证临床实践指南(第8版)
Chest. 2008 Jun;133(6 Suppl):381S-453S. doi: 10.1378/chest.08-0656.
3
The estimation power of alternative comorbidity indices.替代共病指数的估计能力。
Value Health. 2008 Sep-Oct;11(5):946-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00343.x. Epub 2008 May 16.
4
Venous thromboembolism risk and prophylaxis in the acute hospital care setting (ENDORSE study): a multinational cross-sectional study.急性医院护理环境中的静脉血栓栓塞风险与预防(ENDORSE研究):一项跨国横断面研究。
Lancet. 2008 Feb 2;371(9610):387-94. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60202-0.
5
Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in acutely ill hospitalized medical patients: findings from the International Medical Prevention Registry on Venous Thromboembolism.急性病住院内科患者的静脉血栓栓塞预防:国际静脉血栓栓塞医学预防登记研究的结果
Chest. 2007 Sep;132(3):936-45. doi: 10.1378/chest.06-2993. Epub 2007 Jun 15.
6
Risk of venous thromboembolism among hospitalized medically ill patients.内科住院患者发生静脉血栓栓塞症的风险。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2006 Oct 15;63(20 Suppl 6):S16-22. doi: 10.2146/ajhp060389.
7
A prospective registry of 5,451 patients with ultrasound-confirmed deep vein thrombosis.一项对5451例经超声确诊的深静脉血栓形成患者的前瞻性登记研究。
Am J Cardiol. 2004 Jan 15;93(2):259-62. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2003.09.057.
8
Pharmacological thromboembolic prophylaxis in a medical ward: room for improvement.内科病房的药物性血栓栓塞预防:仍有改进空间。
J Gen Intern Med. 2002 Oct;17(10):788-91. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2002.10903.x.
9
Prevention of venous thromboembolism.静脉血栓栓塞的预防
Chest. 2001 Jan;119(1 Suppl):132S-175S. doi: 10.1378/chest.119.1_suppl.132s.
10
Risk factors for deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: a population-based case-control study.深静脉血栓形成和肺栓塞的危险因素:一项基于人群的病例对照研究。
Arch Intern Med. 2000 Mar 27;160(6):809-15. doi: 10.1001/archinte.160.6.809.