Major Trauma Centre, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, King's Health Partners Academic Health Sciences Centre, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 9RS, UK.
World J Emerg Surg. 2011 Oct 13;6(1):33. doi: 10.1186/1749-7922-6-33.
A comprehensive review of data has not yet been provided as penetrating injury to the buttock is not a common condition accounting for 2-3% of all penetrating injuries. The aim of the study is to provide the as yet lacking analytical review of the literature on penetrating trauma to the buttock, with appraisal of characteristics, features, outcomes, and patterns of major injuries. Based on these results we will provide an algorithm. Using a set of terms we searched the databases Pub Med, EMBASE, Cochran, and CINAHL for articles published in English between 1970 and 2010. We analysed cumulative data from prospective and retrospective studies, and case reports. The literature search revealed 36 relevant articles containing data on 664 patients. There was no grade A evidence found. The injury population mostly consists of young males (95.4%) with a high proportion missile injury (75.9%). Bleeding was found to be the key problem which mostly occurs from internal injury and results in shock in 10%. Overall mortality is 2.9% with significant adverse impact of visceral or vascular injury and shock (P < 0.001). The major injury pattern significantly varies between shot and stab injury with small bowel, colon, or rectum injuries leading in shot wounds, whilst vascular injury leads in stab wounds (P < 0.01). Laparotomy was required in 26.9% of patients. Wound infection, sepsis or multiorgan failure, small bowel fistula, ileus, rebleeding, focal neurologic deficit, and urinary tract infection were the most common complications. Sharp differences in injury pattern endorse an algorithm for differential therapy of penetrating buttock trauma. In conclusion, penetrating buttock trauma should be regarded as a life-threatening injury with impact beyond the pelvis until proven otherwise.
由于臀部穿透伤并不常见,仅占所有穿透伤的2%-3%,因此尚未对相关数据进行全面综述。本研究的目的是对现有的关于臀部穿透伤的文献进行分析综述,评估主要损伤的特征、特点、结局及模式。基于这些结果,我们将提供一个算法。我们使用一组检索词在PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane和CINAHL数据库中搜索1970年至2010年间发表的英文文章。我们分析了前瞻性和回顾性研究以及病例报告的累积数据。文献检索共发现36篇相关文章,包含664例患者的数据。未发现A级证据。受伤人群主要为年轻男性(95.4%),其中导弹伤比例较高(75.9%)。出血是关键问题,主要源于内伤,10%的患者会因此导致休克。总体死亡率为2.9%,内脏或血管损伤及休克有显著不良影响(P<0.001)。枪击伤和刺伤的主要损伤模式有显著差异,枪击伤中以小肠、结肠或直肠损伤为主,而刺伤中以血管损伤为主(P<0.01)。26.9%的患者需要进行剖腹手术。伤口感染、脓毒症或多器官功能衰竭、小肠瘘、肠梗阻、再次出血、局灶性神经功能缺损及尿路感染是最常见的并发症。损伤模式的显著差异支持针对臀部穿透伤的差异化治疗算法应以算法为指导。总之,在未证实并非如此之前,臀部穿透伤应被视为一种危及生命的损伤,其影响范围超出骨盆。