University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, PA 15224, USA.
Pathol Res Pract. 2011 Nov 15;207(11):680-5. doi: 10.1016/j.prp.2011.08.007. Epub 2011 Oct 13.
While endometrial neutrophils and plasma cells are criteria used to diagnose histologic endometritis in epidemiologic pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) research, plasma cell misidentification and nonspecificity may limit the accuracy of these criteria. Herein, we examined: (1) the identification of endometrial plasma cells with conventional methyl green pyronin-based methodology versus plasma cell-specific (CD138) immunostaining, (2) the prevalence of endometrial plasma cells among women at low risk for PID, and (3) endometrial leukocyte subpopulations among women diagnosed with acute or chronic histologic endometritis by conventional criteria. We observed an absence of CD138+ cells in 25% of endometrial biopsies in which plasma cells had been identified by conventional methodology, while additional immunohistochemical analyses revealed indistinguishable inflammatory infiltrates among women diagnosed with acute or chronic endometritis by conventional criteria. Among women considered at lower risk for PID development, flow cytometric analyses detected plasma cells in 30% of endometrial biopsy specimens, suggesting that these cells, even when accurately identified, only nonspecifically identify upper genital tract inflammatory processes. Combined, our findings underscore the limitations of the criteria used to diagnose histologic endometritis in PID-related research and suggest that satisfactory understanding of PID pathogenesis, treatment, and prevention is hindered by continued use of these criteria.
虽然子宫内膜中性粒细胞和浆细胞是诊断流行病学盆腔炎性疾病 (PID) 中组织学子宫内膜炎的标准,但浆细胞的错误识别和非特异性可能会限制这些标准的准确性。在此,我们研究了:(1)常规甲基绿派洛宁染色法与浆细胞特异性(CD138)免疫染色法鉴定子宫内膜浆细胞的情况;(2)PID 低风险女性中子宫内膜浆细胞的发生率;(3)通过常规标准诊断为急性或慢性组织学子宫内膜炎的女性的子宫内膜白细胞亚群。我们观察到,在 25%的常规方法鉴定出浆细胞的子宫内膜活检中,缺乏 CD138+细胞,而额外的免疫组化分析表明,通过常规标准诊断为急性或慢性子宫内膜炎的女性之间的炎症浸润没有区别。在被认为发生 PID 风险较低的女性中,流式细胞术分析在 30%的子宫内膜活检标本中检测到浆细胞,表明这些细胞即使被准确识别,也只能非特异性地识别上生殖道炎症过程。综上所述,我们的研究结果强调了 PID 相关研究中用于诊断组织学子宫内膜炎的标准存在局限性,并表明继续使用这些标准会阻碍对 PID 发病机制、治疗和预防的充分理解。