Suppr超能文献

流式细胞术检测 CD4(+) T 淋巴细胞亚群计数的当前实验室操作规范。

Current laboratory practices in flow cytometry for the enumeration of CD 4(+) T-lymphocyte subsets.

作者信息

Whitby L, Whitby A, Fletcher M, Barnett D

机构信息

UK NEQAS for Leucocyte Immunophenotyping (UK NEQAS LI), Department of Haematology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Cytometry B Clin Cytom. 2015 Sep-Oct;88(5):305-11. doi: 10.1002/cyto.b.21241. Epub 2015 Jul 6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

CD4(+) T-lymphocyte subset enumeration is routinely used for monitoring HIV disease progression, with approximately 300,000 tests performed annually in the UK alone. Technical variables can impact upon any laboratory test and therefore the final result obtained. Here, we report the findings of a survey questionnaire issued to 1,587 clinical flow cytometry laboratories to: (a) determine if the UK NEQAS for Leucocyte Immunophenotyping (UK NEQAS LI) lymphocyte subset external quality assessment (EQA) programme was suitable for current laboratory needs and practices; and (b) assess the impact of these responses on clinical practice where CD4(+) T-lymphocyte subsets analysis is undertaken. The survey covered areas not traditionally examined by EQA such as: staffing numbers, flow cytometer age and service intervals, plus six test specific sections covering: leukaemia immunophenotyping, CD4(+) T-lymphocyte subsets analysis (reported here), CD34(+) stem cell testing, low level leucocyte enumeration, minimal residual disease testing and PNH testing.

RESULTS

The responses revealed major methodological variations between centres undertaking CD4(+) T-lymphocyte subset analysis. Significant differences existed in basic laboratory practices such as: normal range derivation; pipetting techniques; instrument maintenance and units of reporting, all of which results in non-adherence to international guidelines.

DISCUSSION

Despite the availability of international guidelines our survey highlighted a lack of concordance amongst laboratory techniques. Such variation could adversely impact on patient care and clinical trial data. Therefore, it is recommended centres undertaking flow cytometric CD4(+) T-lymphocyte subsets analysis urgently review their methodologies and normal ranges to ensure they are fit for purpose and meet current international guidelines.

摘要

背景

CD4(+) T淋巴细胞亚群计数常用于监测HIV疾病进展,仅在英国每年就进行约30万次检测。技术变量会影响任何实验室检测,进而影响最终获得的结果。在此,我们报告了一项针对1587个临床流式细胞术实验室发放的调查问卷的结果,目的是:(a) 确定英国白细胞免疫表型分析国家外部质量评估计划(UK NEQAS LI)淋巴细胞亚群外部质量评估(EQA)计划是否适合当前实验室的需求和实践;(b) 评估这些反馈对进行CD4(+) T淋巴细胞亚群分析的临床实践的影响。该调查涵盖了传统上EQA未涉及的领域,如:人员数量、流式细胞仪的使用年限和维护间隔,以及六个特定检测部分,包括:白血病免疫表型分析、CD4(+) T淋巴细胞亚群分析(本文报告)、CD34(+) 干细胞检测、低水平白细胞计数、微小残留病检测和阵发性睡眠性血红蛋白尿症检测。

结果

反馈显示,进行CD4(+) T淋巴细胞亚群分析的各中心之间存在主要方法学差异。在基本实验室操作方面存在显著差异,如:正常范围的推导;移液技术;仪器维护和报告单位,所有这些都导致未遵循国际指南。

讨论

尽管有国际指南,但我们的调查突出了实验室技术之间缺乏一致性。这种差异可能对患者护理和临床试验数据产生不利影响。因此,建议进行流式细胞术CD4(+) T淋巴细胞亚群分析的中心紧急审查其方法和正常范围,以确保其符合目的并符合当前国际指南。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验