Suppr超能文献

基于定量磁共振成像对典型和非典型帕金森综合征的鉴别诊断。

Differentiation of typical and atypical Parkinson syndromes by quantitative MR imaging.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Georg-August University Gottingen, Gottingen, Germany.

出版信息

AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2011 Dec;32(11):2087-92. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A2865. Epub 2011 Oct 13.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The differential diagnosis of Parkinson syndromes remains a major challenge. Quantitative MR imaging can aid in this classification, but it is unclear which of the proposed techniques is best suited for this task. We, therefore, conducted a head-to-head study with different quantitative MR imaging measurements in patients with IPS, MSA-type Parkinson, PSP, and healthy elderly controls.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-one patients and 13 controls underwent a comprehensive quantitative MR imaging protocol including R2*-, R2- and R1-mapping, magnetization transfer, and DTI with manual region-of-interest measurements in basal ganglia regions. Group differences were assessed with a post hoc ANOVA with a Bonferroni error correction and an ROC.

RESULTS

The best separation of MSA from IPS in patients and controls could be achieved with R2*-mapping in the PU, with an ROC AUC of ≤0.96, resulting in a sensitivity of 77.8% (with a specificity 100%). MD was increased in patients with PSP compared with controls and to a lesser extent compared with those with IPS and MSA in the SN.

CONCLUSIONS

Among the applied quantitative MR imaging methods, R2*-mapping seems to have the best predictive power to separate patients with MSA from those with IPS, and DTI for identifying PSP.

摘要

背景与目的

帕金森综合征的鉴别诊断仍然是一个重大挑战。定量磁共振成像可以辅助这一分类,但目前尚不清楚哪种拟议技术最适合这项任务。因此,我们对 IPS、MSA 型帕金森、PSP 患者和健康老年对照组进行了头对头的研究,比较了不同的定量磁共振成像测量方法。

材料与方法

31 名患者和 13 名对照者接受了全面的定量磁共振成像方案,包括 R2*、R2-和 R1 映射、磁化转移和 DTI,在基底节区域进行手动感兴趣区测量。采用事后 ANOVA 与 Bonferroni 误差校正和 ROC 进行组间差异评估。

结果

在患者和对照组中,PU 中的 R2*-mapping 可最佳分离 MSA 和 IPS,ROC AUC ≤0.96,灵敏度为 77.8%(特异性为 100%)。PSP 患者的 MD 与对照组相比增加,与 IPS 和 MSA 患者相比增加较少。

结论

在应用的定量磁共振成像方法中,R2*-mapping 似乎最具预测能力,可以将 MSA 患者与 IPS 患者区分开来,而 DTI 则可用于识别 PSP。

相似文献

9
Quantitative susceptibility mapping differentiates between parkinsonian disorders.定量磁敏感图可区分帕金森病。
Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2017 Nov;44:51-57. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2017.08.029. Epub 2017 Sep 1.

引用本文的文献

2
Multiple system atrophy - a clinicopathological update.多系统萎缩——临床病理新进展
Free Neuropathol. 2020 Jul 3;1:17. doi: 10.17879/freeneuropathology-2020-2813. eCollection 2020 Jan.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验