Warren D W
Department of Dental Ecology, School of Dentistry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 1990 Aug;23(4):699-712.
This article explores both sides of the controversy concerning respiratory behaviors and dentofacial development. The literature is replete with statements that airway impairment alters facial and dental growth, but there also is substantial evidence to the contrary. Much of the confusion stems from the subjective criteria frequently used in defining the terms impairment and mouth breathing. Additionally, respiratory mechanics have often been viewed simplistically rather than in the realistic sense of a complex regulation/control system. Unfortunately, lack of objectivity may lead to an incorrect diagnosis and even worse, inappropriate treatment. Newer respirometric techniques offering more quantitative assessment of respiratory behaviors are now providing more relevant information and more objective definitions of airway impairment and mouth breathing. More recent findings suggest that nasal-oral breathing per se is not necessarily harmful to growth. However, in instances when the nasopharyngeal or oropharyngeal airspace is small, exaggerated postural responses in obligatory nasal-oral breathers may be detrimental to growth.
本文探讨了有关呼吸行为与牙颌面发育争议的双方观点。文献中充斥着气道受损会改变面部和牙齿生长的说法,但也有大量相反的证据。许多混淆源于在定义“受损”和“口呼吸”术语时经常使用的主观标准。此外,呼吸力学常常被简单地看待,而没有从复杂调节/控制系统的现实角度去理解。不幸的是,缺乏客观性可能导致错误的诊断,更糟糕的是,导致不恰当的治疗。提供对呼吸行为进行更定量评估的更新的呼吸测量技术,现在正在提供更相关的信息以及对气道受损和口呼吸更客观的定义。最近的研究结果表明,鼻-口呼吸本身不一定对生长有害。然而,在鼻咽或口咽气道空间较小的情况下,强制性鼻-口呼吸者过度的姿势反应可能对生长有害。