• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单切口腹腔镜完全腹膜外与腹腔镜完全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术的比较:初步经验。

Comparison of single incision laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal and laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: initial experience.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Zagreb, University Hospital Center Sestre milosrdnice, Zagreb, Croatia.

出版信息

J Endourol. 2012 Jan;26(1):63-6. doi: 10.1089/end.2011.0352. Epub 2011 Oct 14.

DOI:10.1089/end.2011.0352
PMID:21999423
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) surgery has been implemented recently in many laparoscopic (LAP) surgical procedures. We report our initial experience with LESS totally extraperitoneal (LESS-TEP) inguinal hernia repair in relation to conventional LAP-TEP.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between November 2008 and May 2009, 25 LESS-TEP repairs of inguinal hernia and 29 LAP-TEP repairs of inguinal hernia were performed in 44 patients. Data regarding patient demographics, type of hernia, operative time, complications, postoperative hospital stay, and recurrence were prospectively collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

All 44 patients were men, aged 17 to 84 years. Of 44 men, 3 had bilateral inguinal hernias in the LESS-TEP group and 7 in the LAP-TEP group. The operative time for bilateral LESS-TEP was 60 ± 15.3 min (range 40-70 min) and 40 ± 21.6 min (range 20-100 min) for unilateral LESS-TEP, while for bilateral hernia LAP-TEP it was 60 ± 24.8 min (range 40-100 min) and for unilateral LAP-TEP it was 50 ± 14.2 min (range 40-80 min). Comparison of operative times in the LESS-TEP and LAP-TEP groups between the first and second half cohort resulted in significant reduction of operative time in the second half of the LESS-TEP group (P<0.001). There were no intraoperative complications. Discharge was within 72 hours for most patients in both groups. There was one early recurrence (mesh displacement) during a median follow-up period of 11.5 ± 2.5 months in the LESS-TEP group and no recurrences during the 11 ± 1.6 months in the LAP-TEP group.

CONCLUSION

In our experience, LESS-TEP is a safe and feasible procedure with a short learning curve. In all analyzed parameters, it is comparable to conventional LAP-TEP. Further studies that compare LESS-TEP and conventional multiport LAP-TEP repairs with long-term follow-up evaluation are needed to confirm the initial experience.

摘要

背景与目的

腹腔镜单部位(LESS)手术最近已在许多腹腔镜(LAP)手术中实施。我们报告了与传统 LAP-TEP 相比,我们在完全腹膜外(LESS-TEP)腹股沟疝修补术中的初始 LESS 经验。

患者和方法

在 2008 年 11 月至 2009 年 5 月期间,44 例患者接受了 25 例 LESS-TEP 修补术和 29 例 LAP-TEP 修补术治疗腹股沟疝。前瞻性收集并分析了患者人口统计学数据、疝类型、手术时间、并发症、术后住院时间和复发情况。

结果

所有 44 例患者均为男性,年龄 17 至 84 岁。在 44 名男性中,3 名在 LESS-TEP 组中患有双侧腹股沟疝,7 名在 LAP-TEP 组中患有双侧腹股沟疝。双侧 LESS-TEP 的手术时间为 60 ± 15.3 分钟(范围 40-70 分钟),单侧 LESS-TEP 为 40 ± 21.6 分钟(范围 20-100 分钟),而双侧 LAP-TEP 的手术时间为 60 ± 24.8 分钟(范围 40-100 分钟),单侧 LAP-TEP 的手术时间为 50 ± 14.2 分钟(范围 40-80 分钟)。比较 LESS-TEP 和 LAP-TEP 组在第一和第二半队列中的手术时间,结果显示 LESS-TEP 组的手术时间在第二半队列中显著减少(P<0.001)。两组术中均无并发症。两组大多数患者的出院时间均在 72 小时内。在 LESS-TEP 组的中位随访期 11.5 ± 2.5 个月内,有 1 例早期复发(网片移位),而在 LAP-TEP 组的 11 ± 1.6 个月内,无复发。

结论

根据我们的经验,LESS-TEP 是一种安全可行的手术方法,学习曲线较短。在所有分析的参数中,它与传统的 LAP-TEP 相当。需要进一步的研究比较 LESS-TEP 和传统多端口 LAP-TEP 修复术,并进行长期随访评估,以证实初始经验。

相似文献

1
Comparison of single incision laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal and laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: initial experience.单切口腹腔镜完全腹膜外与腹腔镜完全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术的比较:初步经验。
J Endourol. 2012 Jan;26(1):63-6. doi: 10.1089/end.2011.0352. Epub 2011 Oct 14.
2
Single-incision transabdominal preperitoneal and totally extraperitoneal repair for inguinal hernia: early experience from a single center in Asia.单切口经腹腹膜前和完全腹膜外修补术治疗腹股沟疝:来自亚洲单一中心的早期经验
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2011 Nov;4(4):166-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1758-5910.2011.00098.x. Epub 2011 Aug 3.
3
Randomized controlled study of laparoscopic total extraperitoneal versus open Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair.腹腔镜完全腹膜外修补术与开放式李金斯坦腹股沟疝修补术的随机对照研究
Surg Endosc. 2003 Jun;17(6):850-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-002-8575-6. Epub 2003 Mar 28.
4
Single-port laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair with the TriPort system: initial experience.经 Trocar 系统行单孔腹腔镜完全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术:初步经验。
Surg Endosc. 2010 Apr;24(4):952-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0663-4.
5
Is unilateral laparoscopic TEP inguinal hernia repair a job half done? The case for bilateral repair.单侧腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术是做了一半的工作吗?双侧修补的理由。
Surg Endosc. 2010 Jul;24(7):1737-45. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0841-4. Epub 2010 Feb 5.
6
Single-incision totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: our initial 100 cases and comparison with conventional three-port laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair.单切口完全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术:我们的最初100例病例及与传统三孔腹腔镜完全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术的比较
Surg Today. 2015 May;45(5):606-10. doi: 10.1007/s00595-014-0967-4. Epub 2014 Jun 28.
7
Laparoendoscopic single-site extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: initial experience in 10 patients.腹腔镜经腹腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术:10 例初步经验。
J Endourol. 2011 Jun;25(6):963-8. doi: 10.1089/end.2010.0696. Epub 2011 May 4.
8
A comparative study of standard versus laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) totally extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair.标准腹腔镜下单部位手术(LESS)与完全腹膜外(TEP)腹股沟疝修补术的对比研究。
Surg Endosc. 2011 Sep;25(9):2879-83. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-1636-y. Epub 2011 Jun 11.
9
Single-incision totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair is safe and feasible in elderly patients: A single-center experience of 365 procedures.单切口完全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术在老年患者中安全可行:单中心365例手术经验
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2016 Nov;9(4):281-284. doi: 10.1111/ases.12298. Epub 2016 May 18.
10
Perioperative outcomes and complications of open vs laparoscopic extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair in a mature surgical practice.在成熟的外科实践中,开放与腹腔镜腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术的围手术期结局及并发症
Surg Endosc. 2004 Feb;18(2):221-7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-003-8934-y. Epub 2003 Nov 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Preliminary experience in using the lateral single-incision laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal approach for inguinal hernia repair.采用外侧单切口腹腔镜完全腹膜外入路进行腹股沟疝修补术的初步经验。
Updates Surg. 2025 Jan;77(1):237-244. doi: 10.1007/s13304-024-02058-0. Epub 2024 Dec 18.
2
Single-port versus multi-port laparoscopic and robotic inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.单孔与多孔腹腔镜及机器人腹股沟疝修补术:系统评价与网状Meta分析
Surg Endosc. 2025 Jan;39(1):530-544. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11321-9. Epub 2024 Oct 17.
3
Single-port versus traditional three-port laparoscopic total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: A single-centre, prospective, randomised study.
单孔与传统三孔腹腔镜全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术的对比:一项单中心、前瞻性、随机研究。
J Int Med Res. 2024 Jun;52(6):3000605241257418. doi: 10.1177/03000605241257418.
4
Meta‑analysis of single-incision laparoscopic versus multi-trocar laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair.单孔腹腔镜与多孔腹腔镜完全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术的Meta分析
Updates Surg. 2023 Dec;75(8):2133-2145. doi: 10.1007/s13304-023-01634-0. Epub 2023 Aug 28.
5
Single-port versus multi-port totally extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.单孔与多孔完全腹膜外(TEP)腹股沟疝修补术:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Nov 11;101(45):e30820. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000030820.
6
Robotic inguinal hernia repair: is the new Da Vinci single port platform providing any benefit?机器人腹股沟疝修补术:新的达芬奇单孔平台是否有任何优势?
Surg Endosc. 2023 Mar;37(3):2003-2013. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09737-2. Epub 2022 Oct 25.
7
Application of a custom-made single-incision sealing device in laparoscopic surgery for totally extraperitoneal herniorrhaphy: initial experience.定制单切口封闭装置在腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术中的应用:初步经验
Ann Transl Med. 2022 May;10(10):598. doi: 10.21037/atm-21-6809.
8
Feasibility of modified-TEP technique for large inguinoscrotal and large femoral hernia and its advantages.改良-TEP 技术治疗巨大腹股沟-阴囊疝和巨大股疝的可行性及其优势。
Hernia. 2022 Apr;26(2):627-634. doi: 10.1007/s10029-021-02505-6. Epub 2021 Oct 2.
9
Current status of single-port versus multi-port approach in laparoscopic inguinal hernia mesh repair: an up-to-date systematic review and meta-analysis.单孔与多孔腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补网片修复术的现状:最新的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Hernia. 2019 Apr;23(2):217-233. doi: 10.1007/s10029-018-01876-7. Epub 2019 Jan 7.
10
Single incision multiport versus conventional laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: A matched comparison.单切口多通道与传统腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术:配对比较
J Minim Access Surg. 2018 Jan-Mar;14(1):44-51. doi: 10.4103/jmas.JMAS_30_17.