Department of Surgery, Maulana Azad Medical College, University of Delhi, New Delhi, 110002, India.
Surg Endosc. 2010 Jul;24(7):1737-45. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0841-4. Epub 2010 Feb 5.
Bilateral laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) repair of unilateral hernia is conspicuous in published literature by its absence. There are no studies or data on the feasibility, advantages or disadvantages of bilateral repair in all cases or in any subset of patients with unilateral primary inguinal hernia. The objective of this study is to investigate the feasibility of bilateral laparoscopic exploration for all unilateral cases followed by laparoscopic TEP in all cases and to compare complications, recurrence rates, postoperative pain, patient satisfaction, and return to work retrospectively with a similar number of age-matched retrospective controls.
One hundred fifty TEP operations were performed in 75 patients (group A) prospectively and were compared with 75 unilateral TEP operations (group B) in age-matched controls done previously by the same surgeon. All cases were performed under general anesthesia, and TEP repair was performed using three midline ports. All uncomplicated patients were discharged at 24 h, in keeping with departmental policy.
Of 75 patients (group A), 25 (33.3%) were clinically diagnosed with bilateral hernia and the rest (50, 66.66%) with unilateral hernia. The distribution of the 25 bilateral cases was 11 bilateral direct and 14 bilateral indirect inguinal hernias. The distribution of the 75 age-matched controls (group B) was all unilateral hernia, of which 47 were right-sided and 28 were left-sided. There were 23 direct hernias and 52 indirect hernias among the control group. The mean operative time for all 150 cases was 76.66 +/- 15.92 min. The operative time in the control group (unilateral hernias) was 66.16 +/- 12.44 min, whereas the operative time in the test group (bilateral repair) was 87.2 +/- 11.32 min. The operative time in the bilateral group was significantly higher, by 21.04 min or 31.88% (p = 0.000). The operative time in the true unilateral group was 82.45 +/- 9.38 min, whereas the operative time in the former group [occult contralateral hernias (OCHs) + bilateral hernias] was 91.35 +/- 11.95 min, which is a statistically significant difference (p = 0.0015). Occult hernia was seen in a total of 15 cases, of which 13 were OCHs (26%) and 2 were occult ipsilateral hernias (OIH). The mean operative time in the OCH cases was 81.46 +/- 7.9 min, whereas in those without OCH it was 82.45 +/- 9.38 min, which is not a statistically significant difference (p = 0.46). Regarding complications, there were no cases of seroma, hematoma, wound infection, visceral injury or postoperative neuralgia in either group A or B. On statistical analysis, visual analog score (VAS)-measured pain score, at 12 h only, was significantly higher in the unilateral repair group as compared with the bilateral TEP group; VAS scores at all other times were not statistically significantly different between the two groups. The average time of return to light routine or activities of daily living was 1 day in group A, whereas in group B it was 1.91 days (range 1-3 days), which is a statistically significant difference (p = 0.000). There was one case of recurrence in this study, in a left-sided hernia in group A, over a follow-up period of 60-72 (mean 66) months; all patients reported for follow-up by office visit or correspondence until 2 years, and two patients were lost to follow-up after 2 years. In group B, there was no recurrence over a follow-up period of 72-84 months, with three patients lost to follow-up after 3 years.
In the present study bilateral TEP was performed in three types of patients: those with clinically bilateral hernias, those with clinically unilateral hernia but with an OCH, and in truly unilateral hernias. All of these were compared with unilateral TEPs in clinically unilateral hernias, and we found no significant increase in morbidity, pain, recurrence or complications in bilateral repairs. Convalescence from surgery, as determined by return to activities of daily living and return to work parameters, was also comparable. Surgeons experienced in laparoscopic TEP, in high-volume centers, can provide bilateral repairs in patients with inguinal hernia, bearing in mind its advantages and comparable morbidity. We also feel that, in elective repair of inguinal hernia, the patient should be given the option of bilateral repair. Bilateral repair does not add to the risk of surgery in experienced hands and we strongly feel that unilateral TEP is actually a job half done.
双侧腹腔镜完全腹膜外(TEP)修补术治疗单侧疝在已发表的文献中并不常见。目前尚无研究或数据表明,对于所有单侧原发性腹股沟疝患者或任何亚组患者,双侧修复的可行性、优势或劣势如何。本研究的目的是探讨对所有单侧病例进行双侧腹腔镜探查,然后对所有病例行腹腔镜 TEP 的可行性,并与相同术者之前进行的 75 例单侧 TEP 手术的年龄匹配回顾性对照进行比较,比较并发症、复发率、术后疼痛、患者满意度和恢复工作情况,回顾性分析 2 年。
75 例(A 组)患者前瞻性行 150 例 TEP 手术,与之前由同一外科医生进行的 75 例单侧 TEP 手术(B 组)的年龄匹配对照组进行比较。所有病例均在全身麻醉下进行,采用 3 个中线切口进行 TEP 修复。所有无并发症的患者均在 24 小时内出院,符合科室政策。
75 例患者(A 组)中,25 例(33.3%)临床诊断为双侧疝,其余 50 例(66.66%)为单侧疝。25 例双侧病例的分布为 11 例双侧直接疝和 14 例双侧间接疝。75 例年龄匹配对照组(B 组)的分布为 47 例右侧疝和 28 例左侧疝。其中直接疝 23 例,间接疝 52 例。150 例患者的平均手术时间为 76.66+/-15.92 分钟。对照组(单侧疝)的手术时间为 66.16+/-12.44 分钟,而试验组(双侧修复)的手术时间为 87.2+/-11.32 分钟。双侧组的手术时间明显较长,延长 21.04 分钟,即 31.88%(p=0.000)。真正单侧组的手术时间为 82.45+/-9.38 分钟,而前组[隐匿对侧疝(OCH)+双侧疝]的手术时间为 91.35+/-11.95 分钟,差异有统计学意义(p=0.0015)。共发现隐匿性疝 15 例,其中隐匿性对侧疝(OCH)13 例,隐匿性同侧疝(OIH)2 例。OCH 病例的平均手术时间为 81.46+/-7.9 分钟,而无 OCH 的病例为 82.45+/-9.38 分钟,差异无统计学意义(p=0.46)。关于并发症,A 组和 B 组均无血清肿、血肿、伤口感染、内脏损伤或术后神经痛。在统计分析中,仅在 12 小时时,单侧修复组的视觉模拟评分(VAS)测量疼痛评分明显高于双侧 TEP 组;而在其他所有时间点,两组之间的 VAS 评分无统计学差异。A 组患者平均恢复轻体力活动或日常生活活动的时间为 1 天,而 B 组为 1.91 天(范围 1-3 天),差异有统计学意义(p=0.000)。本研究中有 1 例复发,发生在 A 组左侧疝,随访 60-72 个月(平均 66 个月);所有患者均通过门诊或信函随访至 2 年,2 年后有 2 例患者失访。B 组 3 例患者失访后随访 3 年,无复发。
在本研究中,对三种类型的患者进行了双侧 TEP:临床双侧疝患者、临床单侧疝但有 OCH 的患者和真正单侧疝患者。所有这些患者均与临床单侧疝的单侧 TEP 进行比较,我们发现双侧修复在发病率、疼痛、复发或并发症方面没有显著增加。手术恢复期,即日常生活活动和恢复工作参数,也相似。在高容量中心,具有腹腔镜 TEP 经验的外科医生可以为腹股沟疝患者提供双侧修复,同时考虑其优势和相似的发病率。我们还认为,在择期修复腹股沟疝时,应给予患者双侧修复的选择。在经验丰富的手中,双侧修复不会增加手术风险,我们强烈认为单侧 TEP 实际上只是完成了一半的工作。