Department of Emergency Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Acad Emerg Med. 2011 Oct;18 Suppl 2:S54-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01183.x.
The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of an automated procedure logging (APL) system on the number of procedures logged by emergency medicine (EM) residents. Secondary objectives were to assess the APL's effect on completeness and accuracy of procedure logging and to measure resident compliance with the system.
This was a before-and-after study conducted at a university-affiliated, urban medical center, with an annual emergency department census of >130,000. The EM residency is a 4-year, Residency Review Committee (RRC)-accredited program with 12 residents per year. We developed software to electronically search and abstract resident procedures documented in the electronic medical record (EMR) and automatically export them into a Web-based residency management system. We compared the mean daily number of procedures logged for two 6-month periods: October 1, 2009, to March 31, 2010 (pre-APL), and October 1, 2010, to March 31, 2011 (post-APL), using a two-sample t-test. We also generated a random sample of 231 logged procedures from both the pre- and post-APL time periods to assess for completeness and accuracy of data transfer. Completeness and accuracy in the pre- and post-APL periods were compared using Fisher's exact test. Aggregate resident compliance with the system was also measured.
The mean daily number of procedures logged increased by 168% (10.0 vs. 26.8, mean difference = 16.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 15.4 to 18.2, p < 0.001) after the implementation of APL. Procedures logged with the APL system were more complete (76% vs. 100%, p < 0.001) and more accurate (87% vs. 99%, p < 0.001). Most residents (42/48, 88%) used APL to log at least 90% of procedures. Only 4% of procedures eligible for automation were logged manually in the post-APL period.
There was a significant increase in the daily mean number of procedures logged after the implementation of APL. Recorded data were more complete and more accurate during this time frame. This innovative system improved resident logging of required procedures and helped our assessment of Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) Patient Care and Practice-Based Learning Competencies for individual residents.
本研究旨在确定自动程序记录(APL)系统对急诊医学(EM)住院医师记录的程序数量的影响。次要目标是评估 APL 对程序记录的完整性和准确性的影响,并衡量住院医师对该系统的遵守情况。
这是一项在一家大学附属的城市医疗中心进行的前后对照研究,急诊部每年的就诊人数超过 13 万。该 EM 住院医师培训计划是一个为期 4 年的、经过住院医师评审委员会(RRC)认证的项目,每年有 12 名住院医师。我们开发了软件,可以在电子病历(EMR)中自动搜索和提取住院医师记录的程序,并将其自动导出到基于网络的住院医师管理系统中。我们比较了两个 6 个月期间的平均每日记录程序数:2009 年 10 月 1 日至 2010 年 3 月 31 日(APL 前)和 2010 年 10 月 1 日至 2011 年 3 月 31 日(APL 后),使用双样本 t 检验。我们还从前后 APL 时期生成了 231 个随机记录的程序样本,以评估数据传输的完整性和准确性。使用 Fisher 精确检验比较 APL 前后的完整性和准确性。还测量了住院医师对系统的总体遵守情况。
在实施 APL 后,记录的程序数量平均增加了 168%(10.0 与 26.8,平均差异= 16.8,95%置信区间[CI] = 15.4 至 18.2,p < 0.001)。使用 APL 记录的程序更完整(76%与 100%,p < 0.001)且更准确(87%与 99%,p < 0.001)。大多数住院医师(42/48,88%)使用 APL 记录至少 90%的程序。在 APL 后时期,只有 4%符合自动化条件的程序是手动记录的。
在实施 APL 后,每日平均记录的程序数量显著增加。在此期间,记录的数据更完整、更准确。这个创新的系统提高了住院医师对所需程序的记录,帮助我们评估住院医师对住院医师评审委员会(RRC)毕业后医学教育认证(ACGME)患者护理和基于实践的学习能力的表现。