• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在白内障手术覆盖范围方面是否存在性别不平等?拉丁美洲的荟萃分析。

Do gender inequities exist in cataract surgical coverage? Meta-analysis in Latin America.

机构信息

Strategic Solutions, Inc., 1143 Salsbury Ave, Cody, WY 82414, USA.

出版信息

Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2012 Jul;40(5):458-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2011.02722.x. Epub 2011 Dec 6.

DOI:10.1111/j.1442-9071.2011.02722.x
PMID:22004334
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To determine if gender inequities exist in Latin America in regard to cataract surgery.

DESIGN

Meta-analysis.

PARTICIPANTS

Total of 38,992 subjects participating in epidemiological surveys; summary measures were used (not patient-level data).

METHODS

A literature search and knowledge of rapid assessment of cataract surgical services/rapid assessment of avoidable blindness studies carried out in Latin America found 11 studies with complete cataract surgical coverage (CSC) data. Using summary original study data, a meta-analysis (random effects model) was conducted to analyse the differences in CSC between males and females. Results were adjusted for design effect.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Odds ratio (OR) of receiving cataract surgery comparing women with men.

RESULTS

CSC with a visual acuity (VA) <3/60 on an eye basis showed a non-statistically significant OR of 1.01 (95% confidence intervals [CI]: 0.86-1.18) for women receiving cataract surgery in comparison with men. For VA < 6/18, a non-statistically significant OR of 0.94 (95% CI: 0.83-1.07) was obtained for women receiving cataract surgery. On a person basis at a VA of <3/60 and <6/18, non-statistically significant ORs of 1.12 (95% CI: 0.78-1.63) and 0.94 (95% CI: 0.77-1.15) were obtained for women receiving cataract surgery, respectively. Statistical heterogeneity was 0% (I(2) statistic), except for results at a VA of <3/60 on a person basis (I(2) = 30%).

CONCLUSIONS

In the Latin American countries in which CSC was assessed, gender does not appear to be a significant factor in receiving cataract surgery. However, more data are required to confirm these results.

摘要

背景

确定拉丁美洲在白内障手术方面是否存在性别不平等。

设计

荟萃分析。

参与者

共有 38992 名参与流行病学调查的受试者;使用了汇总措施(不是患者水平数据)。

方法

通过文献检索和对拉丁美洲快速评估白内障手术服务/快速评估可避免盲研究的了解,发现了 11 项具有完整白内障手术覆盖率(CSC)数据的研究。使用汇总原始研究数据,进行荟萃分析(随机效应模型),分析男性和女性之间 CSC 的差异。结果针对设计效果进行了调整。

主要观察指标

比较女性和男性接受白内障手术的可能性的比值比(OR)。

结果

基于眼部视力(VA)<3/60 的 CSC 显示,女性接受白内障手术的 OR 为 1.01(95%置信区间[CI]:0.86-1.18),与男性相比无统计学意义。对于 VA<6/18,女性接受白内障手术的 OR 为 0.94(95%CI:0.83-1.07),无统计学意义。在 VA<3/60 和<6/18 的个人基础上,女性接受白内障手术的非统计学显著 OR 分别为 1.12(95%CI:0.78-1.63)和 0.94(95%CI:0.77-1.15)。除了基于个人的 VA<3/60 的结果(I(2)统计量=30%),统计异质性为 0%(I(2)统计量)。

结论

在评估 CSC 的拉丁美洲国家,性别似乎不是接受白内障手术的重要因素。然而,需要更多的数据来证实这些结果。

相似文献

1
Do gender inequities exist in cataract surgical coverage? Meta-analysis in Latin America.在白内障手术覆盖范围方面是否存在性别不平等?拉丁美洲的荟萃分析。
Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2012 Jul;40(5):458-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2011.02722.x. Epub 2011 Dec 6.
2
Meta-analysis of gender inequities in cataract surgical coverage in Latin America.拉丁美洲白内障手术覆盖率的性别不平等现象的荟萃分析。
Cir Cir. 2022;90(1):3-10. doi: 10.24875/CIRU.20001240.
3
Cataract as a Cause of Blindness and Vision Impairment in Latin America: Progress Made and Challenges Beyond 2020.拉丁美洲白内障致盲和视力损伤的原因:2020 年后取得的进展和面临的挑战。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2021 May;225:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2020.12.022. Epub 2021 Jan 4.
4
Follow-up survey of cataract surgical coverage and barriers to cataract surgery at Nkhoma, Malawi.马拉维恩科马白内障手术覆盖率及白内障手术障碍的随访调查
Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2011 Aug;18(4):171-8. doi: 10.3109/09286586.2011.590918.
5
Cataract surgical coverage and outcome of cataract surgery in a rural district in Malawi.马拉维某农村地区白内障手术的覆盖范围及手术效果
Can J Ophthalmol. 2004 Feb;39(1):25-30. doi: 10.1016/s0008-4182(04)80049-8.
6
Profile of cataract surgery in Varamin Iran: a population-based study.伊朗瓦拉明白内障手术概况:一项基于人群的研究。
Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2014 May-Jun;42(4):354-9. doi: 10.1111/ceo.12185. Epub 2013 Nov 11.
7
Cataract surgical coverage: results of a population-based survey at Nkhoma, Malawi.白内障手术覆盖率:马拉维恩科马基于人群的调查结果
Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2000 Sep;7(3):219-21.
8
Gender and use of cataract surgical services in developing countries.发展中国家的性别与白内障手术服务的使用情况
Bull World Health Organ. 2002;80(4):300-3.
9
Rapid assessment of avoidable blindness and cataract surgical services in kilimanjaro region, Tanzania.坦桑尼亚乞力马扎罗地区可避免失明及白内障手术服务的快速评估
Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2010 Mar;17(2):90-4. doi: 10.3109/09286580903453514.
10
Prevalence of blindness and outcomes of cataract surgery in Hainan Province in South China.中国华南海南省的盲症患病率和白内障手术结果。
Ophthalmology. 2013 Nov;120(11):2176-83. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.04.003. Epub 2013 May 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Cataract services for all: Strategies for equitable access from a global modified Delphi process.全民白内障服务:通过全球改良德尔菲法实现公平可及的策略
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023 Feb 22;3(2):e0000631. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000631. eCollection 2023.
2
Are we advancing universal health coverage through cataract services? Protocol for a scoping review.通过白内障服务,我们是否在推进全民健康覆盖?一项范围综述的方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jul 8;10(7):e039458. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039458.
3
Female Gender Remains a Significant Barrier to Access Cataract Surgery in South Asia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
女性性别仍是南亚地区获得白内障手术的重大障碍:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
J Ophthalmol. 2020 Jan 11;2020:2091462. doi: 10.1155/2020/2091462. eCollection 2020.
4
Identification and Description of Reliable Evidence for 2016 American Academy of Ophthalmology Preferred Practice Pattern Guidelines for Cataract in the Adult Eye.识别和描述 2016 年美国眼科学会成人白内障首选实践指南的可靠证据。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2018 May 1;136(5):514-523. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2018.0786.
5
Differential cataract blindness by sex in India: Evidence from two large national surveys.印度不同性别白内障致盲情况:来自两项大型全国性调查的证据
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2017 Feb;65(2):160-164. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_28_15.
6
Social inequalities in blindness and visual impairment: a review of social determinants.社会不平等与失明和视力障碍:社会决定因素综述。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2012 Sep-Oct;60(5):368-75. doi: 10.4103/0301-4738.100529.