Faculty of Dental Medicine, University of Porto, Rua Dr. Manuel Pereira da Silva, Porto, Portugal.
Dent Mater. 2011 Dec;27(12):1238-45. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2011.08.401. Epub 2011 Oct 17.
The aim of the present study was to compare, in situ, the initial dental plaque formation on a recently developed silorane-based composite resin, Filtek Silorane, and on a widely used methacrylate-based composite resin, Synergy D6, and to relate possible differences to surface free energy, hydrophobicity and type of organic matrix.
Discs of Filtek Silorane and Synergy D6 were prepared and polished equally in order to attain the same surface roughness. Water, formamide and 1-bromonaphthalene contact angles were determined and the surface free energy and the hydrophobicity of the materials calculated. Two discs of each material were mounted in individual oral splints and exposed to the oral cavity of 20 participants for 4h. After this period the microbial adhesion to both materials' surface was measured by two different approaches, the DAPI staining and the plate count. Statistical analysis was performed using non-parametric tests.
The surface roughness (R(a) parameter) was similar between the two materials and lower than 0.2μm. Mean water and formamide contact angles were significantly higher for Filtek Silorane, which presented significantly lower surface free energy and greater degree of hydrophobicity in comparison to Synergy D6. The bioadhesion potential evaluated by either DAPI staining or plate count did not differ between the two materials.
In contrast to previous in vitro studies, the present in situ study found no statistically significant differences with respect to bacterial adhesion between Filtek Silorane and Synergy D6, despite the differences found for surface free energy and hydrophobicity.
本研究旨在原位比较新近开发的硅烷酯基复合树脂 Filtek Silorane 与广泛使用的甲基丙烯酸酯基复合树脂 Synergy D6 的初始牙菌斑形成情况,并将可能的差异与表面自由能、疏水性和有机基质类型相关联。
制备和抛光 Filtek Silorane 和 Synergy D6 的圆盘,以达到相同的表面粗糙度。测定水、甲酰胺和 1-溴萘的接触角,并计算材料的表面自由能和疏水性。将每种材料的两个圆盘分别安装在单个口腔夹板中,并将其暴露于 20 名参与者的口腔中 4 小时。在此期间,通过两种不同的方法,即 DAPI 染色和平板计数,测量两种材料表面的微生物黏附情况。使用非参数检验进行统计分析。
两种材料的表面粗糙度(R(a)参数)相似,均低于 0.2μm。Filtek Silorane 的水和甲酰胺接触角平均值明显较高,其表面自由能和疏水性明显低于 Synergy D6。通过 DAPI 染色或平板计数评估的生物黏附潜力在两种材料之间没有差异。
与之前的体外研究相反,尽管在表面自由能和疏水性方面存在差异,但本原位研究未发现 Filtek Silorane 和 Synergy D6 之间在细菌黏附方面存在统计学上显著差异。