• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

性胁迫对认知和情感反应的性别差异。

Gender differences in cognitive and affective responses to sexual coercion.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of New Brunswick, New Brunswick, Canada.

出版信息

J Interpers Violence. 2012 Mar;27(5):827-45. doi: 10.1177/0886260511423250. Epub 2011 Oct 16.

DOI:10.1177/0886260511423250
PMID:22007110
Abstract

This study examined gender differences in responses to sexual coercive experiences in mixed-sex (male-female) relationships. Participants were 112 women and 28 men who had experienced sexual coercion and completed measures of cognitive (attributions to self, attributions to the coercer, internal attributions) and affective (guilt, shame) self-blame, trauma symptoms, and upset at the time of the incident) with respect to their most serious or upsetting sexually coercive experience. The women were more upset than were the men at the time of the incident. Contrary to predictions, the men and women did not differ in the extent to which they attributed blame to themselves or the strength of their internal attributions, guilt, or shame. Both the men and women attributed more blame to the coercer than to themselves; however, the women attributed more blame to the coercer than did the men. The women reported more trauma symptoms than the men did which was related to the finding that more women than men had experienced sexual coercion involving physical force. These results are discussed in terms of the similarities and differences between men's and women's cognitive and affective responses to sexual coercion.

摘要

本研究考察了混合性别(男-女)关系中对性胁迫经历的反应中的性别差异。参与者包括 112 名女性和 28 名男性,他们经历过性胁迫,并完成了关于认知(自我归因、施害者归因、内部归因)和情感(内疚、羞耻)自责、创伤症状和事件发生时的不安)的测量,这些测量是针对他们最严重或最令人不安的性胁迫经历。女性在事件发生时比男性更不安。与预测相反,男性和女性在自我归因和内部归因的程度、内疚或羞耻感方面没有差异。男性和女性都将更多的责任归咎于施害者而不是自己;然而,女性将更多的责任归咎于施害者,而不是男性。与男性相比,女性报告的创伤症状更多,这与更多女性经历过涉及身体暴力的性胁迫的发现有关。这些结果在男性和女性对性胁迫的认知和情感反应的异同方面进行了讨论。

相似文献

1
Gender differences in cognitive and affective responses to sexual coercion.性胁迫对认知和情感反应的性别差异。
J Interpers Violence. 2012 Mar;27(5):827-45. doi: 10.1177/0886260511423250. Epub 2011 Oct 16.
2
Going along with it: sexually coercive partner behavior predicts dating women's compliance with unwanted sex.附和行为:性胁迫伴侣行为预测约会女性对非意愿性行为的依从性。
Violence Against Women. 2010 Jul;16(7):730-42. doi: 10.1177/1077801210374867.
3
The relationship between hegemonic norms of masculinity and men's conceptualization of sexually coercive acts by women in South Africa.南非男性气概的霸权规范与男性对女性性强制行为的概念化之间的关系。
J Interpers Violence. 2015 Mar;30(5):796-817. doi: 10.1177/0886260514536275. Epub 2014 Jun 13.
4
Cognitive representations of sexual self differ as a function of gender and sexual debut.性自我认知的表现因性别和性初体验而异。
Arch Sex Behav. 2011 Feb;40(1):111-20. doi: 10.1007/s10508-009-9545-z. Epub 2009 Sep 9.
5
Positive and negative cognitions of sexual submission: relationship to sexual violence.性顺从的积极与消极认知:与性暴力的关系
Arch Sex Behav. 2006 Aug;35(4):483-90. doi: 10.1007/s10508-006-9046-2. Epub 2006 Aug 15.
6
Feelings of regret following uncommitted sexual encounters in Canadian university students.加拿大大学生非承诺性性行为后的后悔感。
Cult Health Sex. 2012;14(1):45-57. doi: 10.1080/13691058.2011.619579. Epub 2011 Nov 14.
7
Gender differences in patterns of experienced sexual coercion and associated vulnerability factors among young people in the Netherlands.荷兰年轻人经历性胁迫模式及相关脆弱性因素的性别差异。
J Interpers Violence. 2013 Nov;28(16):3149-70. doi: 10.1177/0886260513488689. Epub 2013 May 27.
8
Differences and similarities in men's and women's sexual self-schemas.男性与女性性自我图式的异同
J Sex Res. 2007 May;44(2):135-43. doi: 10.1080/00224490701263611.
9
Sexual coercion in intimate relationships: a comparative analysis of the effects of women's infidelity and men's dominance and control.亲密关系中的性胁迫:女性不忠以及男性主导与控制之影响的比较分析
Arch Sex Behav. 2009 Apr;38(2):226-34. doi: 10.1007/s10508-008-9353-x. Epub 2008 Apr 15.
10
South African women's conceptualisations of and responses to sexual coercion in relation to hegemonic masculinities.南非女性对与霸权男性气质相关的性胁迫的概念化理解及应对方式。
Glob Public Health. 2016;11(1-2):135-52. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2015.1032993. Epub 2015 May 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Sexual Violence and Shame: A Meta-Analysis.性暴力与羞耻感:一项元分析
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2025 Jan 17:15248380241308828. doi: 10.1177/15248380241308828.
2
Between "You" and "Me": Effects of Pronouns and Order on Disclosing Sexual Assault.“你”与“我”之间:代词及顺序对披露性侵犯事件的影响
J Sex Res. 2025 Feb;62(2):276-289. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2024.2341426. Epub 2024 Apr 17.
3
Trauma-Informed Sex Positive Approaches to Sexual Pleasure.创伤知情的性积极的性愉悦方法。
Int J Sex Health. 2021 Sep 24;33(4):537-549. doi: 10.1080/19317611.2021.1961965. eCollection 2021.