University of Texas at Arlingtom College of Nursing, TX 76019, USA.
J Nurs Educ. 2011 Dec;50(12):711-4. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20111017-04. Epub 2011 Oct 17.
This qualitative study explored the feelings, beliefs, and attitudes of senior-level undergraduate pediatric nursing students upon completion of a medication administration Objective Structured Clinical Evaluation (OSCE). The affective domain is the most neglected domain in higher education, although it is deemed the "gateway to learning." Quantitative assessments of clinical skills performed during OSCEs usually address two of the three domains of learning: cognitive (knowledge) and psychomotor skills. Twenty students volunteered to participate in focus groups (10 per group) and were asked three questions relevant to their feelings, beliefs, and attitudes about their OSCE experiences. Students integrated the attitude of safety first into future practice but felt that anxiety, loss of control, reaction under pressure, and no feedback affected their ability to connect the OSCE performance with future clinical practice. The findings affect future affective domain considerations in the development, modification, and assessment of OSCEs across the undergraduate nursing curriculum.
本定性研究探讨了在完成一项给药客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)后,高年级本科儿科护理学生的感受、信念和态度。情感领域是高等教育中最被忽视的领域,尽管它被认为是“学习的门户”。OSCE 期间进行的临床技能的定量评估通常涉及学习的三个领域中的两个:认知(知识)和运动技能。20 名学生自愿参加焦点小组(每组 10 名),并被问及三个与他们对 OSCE 经历的感受、信念和态度相关的问题。学生将安全第一的态度融入未来的实践中,但认为焦虑、失去控制、压力下的反应和缺乏反馈会影响他们将 OSCE 表现与未来临床实践联系起来的能力。这些发现影响了未来在本科护理课程中开发、修改和评估 OSCE 时对情感领域的考虑。