Division of Cardiology, Goztepe Medical Park Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Clin Exp Hypertens. 2012;34(3):165-70. doi: 10.3109/10641963.2011.577488. Epub 2011 Oct 18.
Epicardial fat tissue reflects visceral adiposity and is a suggested cardiometabolic risk factor. Patients with abdominal obesity have an increased prevalence of the non-dipper blood pressure (BP) pattern, but it is unclear whether the same is true of patients with increased epicardial fat thickness (EFT). The association between EFT and circadian BP changes in patients with recently diagnosed essential hypertension was examined.
Sixty hypertensive patients underwent echocardiography, treadmill stress testing, and 24 hours of ambulatory BP monitoring. Epicardial fat thickness and left ventricular mass (LVM) index were measured by using transthoracic echocardiography. The patients were categorized into two groups according to their BP pattern (group 1, non-dippers; group 2, dippers).
The mean EFT and LVM of patients in group 1 (n = 24) (EFT, 7.6 ± 2.1 mm; LVM, 130 ± 31.2 g/m(2)) were significantly greater than those of group 2 (n = 36) (EFT, 5.5 ± 1.2 mm, P = .0001; LVM, 107 ± 23.7 g/m(2), P = .002). The average systolic BP over 24 hours (BP(s) 24) and average diastolic BP over 24 hours (BP(d) 24) of group 1 (BP(s) 24, 151.1 ± 17.6 mm Hg; BP(d) 24, 94.1 ± 16.5 mm Hg) were significantly higher than those of group 2 (BP(s) 24, 136.7 ± 11.9 mm Hg, P = .0001; BP(d) 24, 84.6 ± 10.6 mm Hg; P = .008). Multivariate backward logistic regression analysis demonstrated that the non-dipper BP pattern was associated with EFT (standardized β coefficient = 0.87, P = .005) and LVM (standardized β coefficient = 0.43, P = .016). An EFT ≥ 7 mm was associated with the non-dipper BP pattern with 44% sensitivity and 94% specificity (receiver operating characteristic area under curve of 0.72, 95% CI [0.59-0.83], P = .0007).
Epicardial fat thickness was above average in newly diagnosed, untreated hypertensive patients with non-dipper BP pattern. The echocardiographic measurement of EFT may be used to indicate increased risk of hypertension-related adverse cardiovascular events.
心外膜脂肪组织反映内脏肥胖,是一种心血管代谢风险因素。腹部肥胖患者的非杓型血压(BP)模式更为常见,但心外膜脂肪厚度(EFT)增加的患者是否也如此尚不清楚。本研究旨在探讨新诊断的原发性高血压患者 EFT 与昼夜 BP 变化之间的关系。
60 例高血压患者接受了超声心动图、跑步机压力测试和 24 小时动态血压监测。采用经胸超声心动图测量心外膜脂肪厚度和左心室质量(LVM)指数。根据 BP 模式将患者分为两组(组 1,非杓型;组 2,杓型)。
组 1(n = 24)患者的平均 EFT(7.6 ± 2.1 mm)和 LVM(130 ± 31.2 g/m2)明显大于组 2(n = 36)(EFT:5.5 ± 1.2 mm,P =.0001;LVM:107 ± 23.7 g/m2,P =.002)。组 1 的 24 小时平均收缩压(BP(s) 24)和 24 小时平均舒张压(BP(d) 24)(BP(s) 24:151.1 ± 17.6 mm Hg;BP(d) 24:94.1 ± 16.5 mm Hg)明显高于组 2(BP(s) 24:136.7 ± 11.9 mm Hg,P =.0001;BP(d) 24:84.6 ± 10.6 mm Hg,P =.008)。多变量向后逻辑回归分析表明,非杓型 BP 模式与 EFT(标准化β系数= 0.87,P =.005)和 LVM(标准化β系数= 0.43,P =.016)相关。EFT≥7 mm 与非杓型 BP 模式相关,敏感性为 44%,特异性为 94%(接受者操作特征曲线下面积为 0.72,95%CI [0.59-0.83],P =.0007)。
新诊断、未经治疗的原发性高血压患者中,非杓型 BP 模式患者的 EFT 偏高。EFT 的超声心动图测量可能用于提示与高血压相关的不良心血管事件风险增加。