Sun Hao-lin, Li Chun-de, Liu Xian-yi, Lin Jing-rong, Yi Xiao-dong, Liu Hong, Lu Hai-lin
Department of Orthopedics, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing 100034, China.
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2011 Oct 18;43(5):690-5.
To assess the indications,efficacy and safety of application of interspinous implants for degenerative lumbar diseases by mid-term follow-up and analysis of the failure cases.
In our study, 52 cases of degenerative lumbar diseases treated with interspinous implants From September 2007 to September 2008 were divided into Wallis group (25 cases) and Coflex group (27 cases). The clinical results were assessed by lumbar pain visual analog score (VAS) and lower limber pain VAS, lumbar Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score and Prolo functional score; the radiological results including implant positon, segmental lodosis and segment movement degree were assessed by lumbar X ray post-operation compared with pre-operation. For cases of discogenic low back pain, lumbar disc changes were assessed by lumbar MRI 12 months post operation.
Fifty-two cases had complete follow-up and the average time was 30.4 months. In the final follow up, lumbar pain VAS,lower limber pain VAS,lumbar JOA score and Prolo functional score of Wallis group were (2.5 ± 1.7),(2.7 ± 1.4),(23.4 ± 3.1)and(8.9 ± 1.4), which were better than pre-operation (5.3 ± 3.0),(7.4 ± 2.6),(13.5 ± 4.6)and(4.5 ± 2.6 ),lumbar pain VAS P=0.027, all others P<0.001 ;lumbar pain VAS,lower limber pain VAS,lumbar JOA score and Prolo functional score of Coflex group were (2.6 ± 2.9),(3.8 ± 1.9),(21.2 ± 3.5)and(8.5 ± 1.8),which were better than pre-operation (5.5 ± 3.2),(7.1 ± 2.8), (13.1 ± 4.8)and(4.2 ± 2.5), lumbar pain VAS P=0.036, all others P<0.001;in the final follow up,lower limber pain VAS of Wallis group was (2.7 ± 1.4), which was better than (3.8 ± 1.9) of Coflex group(P=0.039);in the final follow up, Segment lodosis angles of Wallis group was 14.3° ± 3.9°, which was larger than 13.2° ± 3.5° of Coflex group (P=0.028); Segment movement degree of Wallis group was 9.6° ± 2.8°, which was smaller than 12.8°±3.0°of Coflex group (P=0.019).In Coflex group,four cases of lumbar disc herniation relapsed and three cases received second operation. One case with lumbar stenosis suffered from lumbar disc herniation of the same segments and received second revision operation.
Treatments with interspinous implants for the degenerative lumbar diseases are effective, but we should pay attention to the indication and apply them for lumbar disc herniation with caution.
通过中期随访及对失败病例的分析,评估棘突间植入物治疗退行性腰椎疾病的适应证、疗效及安全性。
本研究中,将2007年9月至2008年9月采用棘突间植入物治疗的52例退行性腰椎疾病患者分为Wallis组(25例)和Coflex组(27例)。通过腰椎疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)、下肢疼痛VAS、腰椎日本骨科学会(JOA)评分及Prolo功能评分评估临床结果;通过术后腰椎X线与术前对比评估影像学结果,包括植入物位置、节段性前凸及节段活动度。对于椎间盘源性下腰痛病例,术后12个月通过腰椎MRI评估腰椎间盘变化。
52例患者均获完整随访,平均随访时间30.4个月。末次随访时,Wallis组腰椎疼痛VAS、下肢疼痛VAS、腰椎JOA评分及Prolo功能评分分别为(2.5±1.7)、(2.7±1.4)、(23.4±3.1)和(8.9±1.4),均优于术前(5.3±3.0)、(7.4±2.6)、(13.5±4.6)和(4.5±2.6),腰椎疼痛VAS P=0.027,其余均P<0.001;Coflex组腰椎疼痛VAS、下肢疼痛VAS、腰椎JOA评分及Prolo功能评分分别为(2.6±2.9)、(3.8±1.9)、(21.2±3.5)和(8.5±1.8),均优于术前(5.5±3.2)、(7.1±2.8)、(13.1±4.8)和(4.2±2.5),腰椎疼痛VAS P=0.036,其余均P<0.001;末次随访时,Wallis组下肢疼痛VAS为(2.7±1.4),优于Coflex组的(3.8±1.9)(P=0.039);末次随访时,Wallis组节段性前凸角度为14.3°±3.9°,大于Coflex组的13.2°±3.5°(P=0.028);Wallis组节段活动度为9.6°±2.8°,小于Coflex组的12.8°±3.0°(P=0.019)。Coflex组中,4例腰椎间盘突出症复发,3例行二次手术。1例腰椎管狭窄症患者同一节段发生腰椎间盘突出症,行二次翻修手术。
棘突间植入物治疗退行性腰椎疾病有效,但应注意适应证,谨慎应用于腰椎间盘突出症。