Suppr超能文献

[光固化模式对复合树脂聚合收缩率及表面硬度的影响]

[Effects of light-curing modes on the polymerization shrinkage and surface hardness of composite resins].

作者信息

Han Bing, Dong Yan-mei, Wang Xiao-yan, Gao Xue-jun

机构信息

Department of Cariology, Endodontology and Operative Dentistry, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing 100081, China.

出版信息

Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2011 Oct 18;43(5):770-3.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effects of light-curing modes on the polymerization shrinkage and surface hardness of resins and to explore the related clinical relevance.

METHODS

Resins with filler content of 76%(mass fraction) were light-cured by high intensity, low intensity and soft start curing modes for 10 s and 20 s, respectively. Specimens for detecting volumetric shrinkage and surface hardness were prepared. Volumetric shrinkage was measured with Acuvol (n=7) and surface hardness were tested with an indenter (n=5).

RESULTS

The volumetric shrinkage of composites cured by high intensity, low intensity and soft-start curing mode was: 2.95% ± 0.08%/3.06% ± 0.03% (10 s/20 s), 2.98% ± 0.12%/3.05% ± 0.13% (10 s/20 s), and 3.03% ± 0.05%/3.11% ± 0.07% (10 s/20 s), respectively. No significant difference existed among polymerization shrinkage of composites cured by the three light-curing modes (P>0.05). The hardness of composites cured by high intensity, low intensity and soft-start curing mode was: (36.82 ± 4.45) MPa/(47.58 ± 3.16) MPa (10 s/20 s), (32.30 ± 1.33) MPa/(41.60 ± 1.83) MPa (10 s/20 s), and (34.56 ± 1.38) MPa/(44.62 ± 2.13) MPa (10 s/20 s), respectively. There existed significant difference among hardness of composites cured by the three light-curing modes (P<0.05). Polymerization shrinkage was correlated with energy density (r=-0.363,P=0.018). Surface hardness was also correlated with energy density (r=-0.890,P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

It would be better to use high intensity curing mode to improve the physical properties of restorations. In order to keep the physical properties of composites, it is necessary to prolong the curing time using soft-start/low intensity curing modes to increase the energy density.

摘要

目的

研究光固化模式对树脂聚合收缩率和表面硬度的影响,并探讨其相关临床意义。

方法

分别采用高强度、低强度和软启动固化模式对填料含量为76%(质量分数)的树脂进行10秒和20秒的光固化。制备用于检测体积收缩率和表面硬度的试样。用Acuvol测量体积收缩率(n = 7),用压头测试表面硬度(n = 5)。

结果

高强度、低强度和软启动固化模式固化的复合材料的体积收缩率分别为:2.95%±0.08%/3.06%±0.03%(10秒/20秒)、2.98%±0.12%/3.05%±0.13%(10秒/20秒)和3.03%±0.05%/3.11%±0.07%(10秒/20秒)。三种光固化模式固化的复合材料的聚合收缩率之间无显著差异(P>0.05)。高强度、低强度和软启动固化模式固化的复合材料的硬度分别为:(36.82±4.45)MPa/(47.58±3.16)MPa(10秒/20秒)、(32.30±1.33)MPa/(41.60±1.83)MPa(10秒/20秒)和(34.56±1.38)MPa/(44.62±2.13)MPa(10秒/20秒)。三种光固化模式固化的复合材料的硬度之间存在显著差异(P<0.05)。聚合收缩率与能量密度相关(r = -0.363,P = 0.018)。表面硬度也与能量密度相关(r = -0.890,P<0.001)。

结论

采用高强度固化模式可更好地改善修复体的物理性能。为保持复合材料的物理性能,使用软启动/低强度固化模式时,有必要延长固化时间以提高能量密度。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验