Han Bing, Dong Yan-mei, Wang Xiao-yan, Gao Xue-jun
Department of Cariology, Endodontology and Operative Dentistry, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing 100081, China.
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2011 Oct 18;43(5):770-3.
To investigate the effects of light-curing modes on the polymerization shrinkage and surface hardness of resins and to explore the related clinical relevance.
Resins with filler content of 76%(mass fraction) were light-cured by high intensity, low intensity and soft start curing modes for 10 s and 20 s, respectively. Specimens for detecting volumetric shrinkage and surface hardness were prepared. Volumetric shrinkage was measured with Acuvol (n=7) and surface hardness were tested with an indenter (n=5).
The volumetric shrinkage of composites cured by high intensity, low intensity and soft-start curing mode was: 2.95% ± 0.08%/3.06% ± 0.03% (10 s/20 s), 2.98% ± 0.12%/3.05% ± 0.13% (10 s/20 s), and 3.03% ± 0.05%/3.11% ± 0.07% (10 s/20 s), respectively. No significant difference existed among polymerization shrinkage of composites cured by the three light-curing modes (P>0.05). The hardness of composites cured by high intensity, low intensity and soft-start curing mode was: (36.82 ± 4.45) MPa/(47.58 ± 3.16) MPa (10 s/20 s), (32.30 ± 1.33) MPa/(41.60 ± 1.83) MPa (10 s/20 s), and (34.56 ± 1.38) MPa/(44.62 ± 2.13) MPa (10 s/20 s), respectively. There existed significant difference among hardness of composites cured by the three light-curing modes (P<0.05). Polymerization shrinkage was correlated with energy density (r=-0.363,P=0.018). Surface hardness was also correlated with energy density (r=-0.890,P<0.001).
It would be better to use high intensity curing mode to improve the physical properties of restorations. In order to keep the physical properties of composites, it is necessary to prolong the curing time using soft-start/low intensity curing modes to increase the energy density.
研究光固化模式对树脂聚合收缩率和表面硬度的影响,并探讨其相关临床意义。
分别采用高强度、低强度和软启动固化模式对填料含量为76%(质量分数)的树脂进行10秒和20秒的光固化。制备用于检测体积收缩率和表面硬度的试样。用Acuvol测量体积收缩率(n = 7),用压头测试表面硬度(n = 5)。
高强度、低强度和软启动固化模式固化的复合材料的体积收缩率分别为:2.95%±0.08%/3.06%±0.03%(10秒/20秒)、2.98%±0.12%/3.05%±0.13%(10秒/20秒)和3.03%±0.05%/3.11%±0.07%(10秒/20秒)。三种光固化模式固化的复合材料的聚合收缩率之间无显著差异(P>0.05)。高强度、低强度和软启动固化模式固化的复合材料的硬度分别为:(36.82±4.45)MPa/(47.58±3.16)MPa(10秒/20秒)、(32.30±1.33)MPa/(41.60±1.83)MPa(10秒/20秒)和(34.56±1.38)MPa/(44.62±2.13)MPa(10秒/20秒)。三种光固化模式固化的复合材料的硬度之间存在显著差异(P<0.05)。聚合收缩率与能量密度相关(r = -0.363,P = 0.018)。表面硬度也与能量密度相关(r = -0.890,P<0.001)。
采用高强度固化模式可更好地改善修复体的物理性能。为保持复合材料的物理性能,使用软启动/低强度固化模式时,有必要延长固化时间以提高能量密度。