Görner Peter, Simon Xavier, Bémer Denis, Lidén Göran
Institut National de Recherche et de Sécurité, 1 rue du Morvan, CS 60027, 54519 Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France.
J Environ Monit. 2012 Feb;14(2):420-8. doi: 10.1039/c1em10558b. Epub 2011 Oct 19.
Direct-reading aerosol measurement usually uses the optical properties of airborne particles to detect and measure particle concentration. In the case of occupational hygiene, mass concentration measurement is often required. Two aerosol monitoring methods are based on the principle of light scattering: optical particle counting (OPC) and photometry. The former analyses the light scattered by a single particle, the latter by a cloud of particles. Both methods need calibration to transform the quantity of scattered light detected into particle concentration. Photometers are simpler to use and can be directly calibrated to measure mass concentration. However, their response varies not only with aerosol concentration but also with particle size distribution, which frequently contributes to biased measurement. Optical particle counters directly measure the particle number concentration and particle size that allows assessment of the particle mass provided the particles are spherical and of known density. An integrating algorithm is used to calculate the mass concentration of any conventional health-related aerosol fraction. The concentrations calculated thus have been compared with simultaneous measurements by conventional gravimetric sampling to check the possibility of field OPC calibration with real workplace aerosols with a view to further monitoring particle mass concentration. Aerosol concentrations were measured in the food industry using the OPC GRIMM® 1.108 and the CIP 10-Inhalable and CIP 10-Respirable (ARELCO®) aerosol samplers while meat sausages were being brushed and coated with calcium carbonate. Previously, the original OPC inlet had been adapted to sample inhalable aerosol. A mixed aerosol of calcium carbonate and fungi spores was present in the workplace. The OPC particle-size distribution and an estimated average particle density of both aerosol components were used to calculate the mass concentration. The inhalable and respirable aerosol fractions calculated from the OPC data are closely correlated with the results of the particle size-selective sampling using the CIP 10. Furthermore, the OPC data allow calculation of the thoracic fraction of workplace aerosol (not measured by sampling), which is interesting in the presence of allergenic particles like fungi spores. The results also show that the modified COP inlet adequately samples inhalable aerosol in the range of workplace particle-size distribution.
直读式气溶胶测量通常利用空气中颗粒物的光学特性来检测和测量颗粒物浓度。在职业卫生领域,常常需要测量质量浓度。有两种基于光散射原理的气溶胶监测方法:光学粒子计数法(OPC)和光度测定法。前者分析单个粒子散射的光,后者分析一团粒子散射的光。两种方法都需要校准,以便将检测到的散射光量转换为粒子浓度。光度计使用更简便,并且可以直接校准以测量质量浓度。然而,其响应不仅随气溶胶浓度变化,还随粒径分布变化,这常常导致测量有偏差。光学粒子计数器直接测量粒子数浓度和粒径,前提是粒子为球形且密度已知,由此可以评估粒子质量。使用积分算法来计算任何与健康相关的常规气溶胶组分的质量浓度。将这样计算出的浓度与通过传统重量法采样同时进行的测量结果进行比较,以检验利用实际工作场所气溶胶对现场OPC进行校准的可能性,以便进一步监测粒子质量浓度。在食品工业中,当肉肠被刷涂碳酸钙时,使用OPC GRIMM® 1.108以及CIP 10-可吸入和CIP 10-可呼吸(ARELCO®)气溶胶采样器测量气溶胶浓度。此前,已对原始OPC入口进行了改造,以采集可吸入气溶胶。工作场所存在碳酸钙和真菌孢子的混合气溶胶。利用OPC粒径分布以及两种气溶胶组分的估计平均粒子密度来计算质量浓度。根据OPC数据计算出的可吸入和可呼吸气溶胶组分与使用CIP 10进行的粒径选择性采样结果密切相关。此外,OPC数据还能计算工作场所气溶胶的胸腔组分(采样未测量),在存在真菌孢子等致敏性粒子的情况下这很有意义。结果还表明,改造后的COP入口能够在工作场所粒径分布范围内充分采集可吸入气溶胶。