North Florida/South Georgia Veterans Health System, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Ann Pharmacother. 2011 Nov;45(11):1445-9. doi: 10.1345/aph.1Q461. Epub 2011 Oct 18.
To evaluate current evidence for the use of lacosamide in the treatment of refractory status epilepticus.
Literature was accessed via PubMed (through July 2011) using the terms lacosamide and status epilepticus.
All reports on the use of lacosamide in patients with status epilepticus were included for evaluation. Reviews and animal data were excluded.
Treatment of status epilepticus is challenging, and most patients fail to respond to initial treatment. Recently, several reports have been published on the use of lacosamide for status epilepticus. Eleven reports (5 case reports and 6 case series) were identified. Lacosamide was credited with successful termination of status epilepticus in a majority of these reports. However, the data are weakened by the heterogeneity of the reports, their descriptive nature, and the common divergence from current recommendations for the treatment of status epilepticus.
While lacosamide has been reported as an effective treatment for refractory status epilepticus, there is insufficient evidence for its routine use. For cases in which the risks associated with anesthetizing drugs are believed to outweigh the benefits, such as in complex partial status epilepticus, lacosamide may be a reasonable option after more established drug therapies fail.
评估拉科酰胺治疗难治性癫痫持续状态的现有证据。
通过 PubMed(截至 2011 年 7 月)使用拉科酰胺和癫痫持续状态这两个术语检索文献。
纳入所有关于拉科酰胺在癫痫持续状态患者中应用的报告进行评估。排除综述和动物数据。
癫痫持续状态的治疗具有挑战性,大多数患者初始治疗后无效。最近,有几篇关于拉科酰胺治疗癫痫持续状态的报告发表。确定了 11 份报告(5 份病例报告和 6 份病例系列)。在这些报告中,拉科酰胺被认为对大多数癫痫持续状态有效。然而,由于报告的异质性、描述性性质以及与癫痫持续状态治疗的现行建议普遍背离,数据受到削弱。
虽然拉科酰胺已被报道为治疗难治性癫痫持续状态的有效治疗方法,但尚无充分证据支持其常规使用。对于麻醉药物相关风险被认为大于益处的情况,例如复杂部分性癫痫持续状态,在更传统的药物治疗失败后,拉科酰胺可能是一个合理的选择。