Suppr超能文献

磨牙症患者在基础状态及六周治疗结束时,咬合稳定夹板和软性咬合夹板对肌电图模式的影响。

Influence of occlusal stabilization splints and soft occlusal splints on the electromyographic pattern, in basal state and at the end of six weeks treatment in patients with bruxism.

作者信息

Cruz-Reyes René A, Martínez-Aragón Ivette, Guerrero-Arias Rafael E, García-Zura David A, González-Sánchez Luis E

出版信息

Acta Odontol Latinoam. 2011;24(1):66-74.

Abstract

The aim of this study is to assess the electrical activity generated in temporal and masseter muscles during voluntary muscular contraction of patients with bruxism, as a result of the use of two types of occlusal splints (occlusal stabilization splint and soft occlusal splint) in which 2 groups of 8 patients were evaluated -12 women and four men aged 19 to 40 years, who used a single type of occlusal splint for 46 to 60 days. The splints were made from sheets of rigid acetate plus heat-cured acrylic (occlusal stabilization splint, control group) and sheets of flexible acetate (soft occlusal splint, experimental group). Two electromyographic tests (EMG) were performed on each patient; one before placing the splint and another at the end of the treatment. The statistical analysis used was computerized variance ANOVA analysis with F distribution (P < or = 0.025). In the control group, muscle electrical activity increased significantly in 5 patients and decreased slightly in 3. In the experimental group, there was considerable reduction of such activity in 6 patients and a slight increase in 2. There is a statistically significant difference (P < or = 0.025) between the muscle electrical activity generated in the control group and in the experimental group. The increase in muscle electrical activity in the control group may have been due to a neuromuscular recovery process; while the decrease in the experimental group might have been due to a negative or decremental process of muscular organization to prevent the recruitment of new motor units. Occlusal stabilization splints are therefore considered better than soft occlusal splints.

摘要

本研究旨在评估磨牙症患者在使用两种类型的咬合板(咬合稳定板和软质咬合板)进行自主肌肉收缩时颞肌和咬肌产生的电活动。本研究对两组各8名患者进行了评估,其中包括12名女性和4名年龄在19至40岁之间的男性,他们使用单一类型的咬合板46至60天。咬合稳定板(对照组)由硬质醋酸酯片加热固化丙烯酸制成,软质咬合板(实验组)由柔性醋酸酯片制成。对每位患者进行了两项肌电图测试(EMG);一项在佩戴咬合板前进行,另一项在治疗结束时进行。所采用的统计分析是使用F分布的计算机方差分析(P≤0.025)。在对照组中,5名患者的肌肉电活动显著增加,3名患者略有下降。在实验组中,6名患者的此类活动大幅减少,2名患者略有增加。对照组和实验组产生的肌肉电活动之间存在统计学显著差异(P≤0.025)。对照组肌肉电活动的增加可能是由于神经肌肉恢复过程;而实验组的减少可能是由于肌肉组织的负性或递减过程,以防止新运动单位的募集。因此,咬合稳定板被认为优于软质咬合板。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验