Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 50 Ilwon-Dong, Kangnam-Ku, Seoul 135-710, Republic of Korea.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Oct 19;93(20):1865-72. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.K.00136.
The correlation between graft appearance and clinical outcome after double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is a major concern. In this study, the graft appearance was assessed with use of second-look arthroscopy and was correlated with the clinical outcome. Overall clinical outcomes after double-bundle ACL reconstruction with use of a single tibial tunnel were analyzed.
Thirty-seven knees that underwent second-look arthroscopy after double-bundle ACL reconstruction and sixty-two knees that underwent double-bundle ACL reconstruction without subsequent second-look arthroscopy were included in this retrospective study. The ninety-nine patients enrolled were followed for thirty-five months (range, twenty-four to fifty-eight months), and the mean duration from ACL reconstruction to second-look arthroscopy was twenty-five months (range, twelve to thirty-six months). Graft thickness, apparent graft tension, and synovial coverage were graded during second-look arthroscopy. Correlations were sought between graft appearance and Lysholm knee scores, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) grades, anterior laxity, and pivot-shift test results.
Postoperatively, ninety-four (94.9%) of the ninety-nine knees had an IKDC rating of B or higher, mean anterior laxity was 1.29 mm (range, 0 to 6 mm), and ninety-two knees (92.9%) had a negative pivot-shift result. With regard to graft thickness and tension, anteromedial bundles were graded as A in twenty-eight (75.7%) of the thirty-seven second-look knees and as B in nine knees (24.3%). Posterolateral bundles were graded as A in twenty-five knees (67.6%), B in six knees (16.2%), and C in six knees (16.2%). With regard to synovial coverage, anteromedial bundles were graded as C in only two knees (5.4%) and posterolateral bundles were graded as C in six knees (16.2%). No correlation was found between graft appearance and clinical outcome.
In the present study, we observed that clinical outcomes were as satisfactory with a single tibial tunnel as with two tibial tunnels. However, more tears and poorer synovial coverage were observed for posterolateral than for anteromedial bundles during second-look arthroscopy. No significant correlation was found between graft appearance and clinical outcome.
在前交叉韧带(ACL)重建的双束重建中,移植物的外观与临床结果之间的相关性是一个主要关注点。在这项研究中,使用二次关节镜检查评估了移植物的外观,并将其与临床结果相关联。分析了使用单个胫骨隧道进行双束 ACL 重建后的整体临床结果。
这项回顾性研究纳入了 37 例接受双束 ACL 重建后二次关节镜检查和 62 例未行二次关节镜检查的双束 ACL 重建患者。99 例患者的随访时间为 35 个月(24 至 58 个月),从 ACL 重建到二次关节镜检查的平均时间为 25 个月(12 至 36 个月)。在二次关节镜检查期间,对移植物的厚度、明显的移植物张力和滑膜覆盖情况进行了分级。寻找移植物外观与 Lysholm 膝关节评分、国际膝关节文献委员会(IKDC)评分、前向松弛度和前抽屉试验结果之间的相关性。
术后,99 例膝关节中有 94 例(94.9%)的 IKDC 评分为 B 或更高,平均前向松弛度为 1.29mm(范围为 0 至 6mm),92 例膝关节(92.9%)的前抽屉试验结果为阴性。就移植物的厚度和张力而言,前内侧束在 37 例二次关节镜检查膝关节中有 28 例(75.7%)评为 A,9 例(24.3%)评为 B。后外侧束在 25 例膝关节中评为 A(67.6%),在 6 例膝关节中评为 B(16.2%),在 6 例膝关节中评为 C(16.2%)。就滑膜覆盖而言,前内侧束仅在 2 例膝关节中评为 C(5.4%),而后外侧束在 6 例膝关节中评为 C(16.2%)。未发现移植物外观与临床结果之间存在相关性。
在本研究中,我们观察到使用单个胫骨隧道的临床结果与使用两个胫骨隧道一样令人满意。然而,在二次关节镜检查中,后外侧束比前内侧束更容易撕裂且滑膜覆盖较差。未发现移植物外观与临床结果之间存在显著相关性。