Suppr超能文献

前交叉韧带重建术后二次关节镜检查时移植物成熟度的评估参数:一项系统评价

Evaluation parameters of graft maturation on second-look arthroscopy following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review.

作者信息

Kim Sang-Gyun, Jung Jae Hyun, Song Jong-Hyub, Bae Ji-Hoon

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, 148 Gurodong-ro, Guro-gu, Seoul, 08308, Republic of Korea.

Department of Rheumatology, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Knee Surg Relat Res. 2019 Jun 28;31(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s43019-019-0005-3.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this systematic review was to investigate and summarize the evaluation methods of graft maturation on second-look arthroscopy following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.

METHODS

A literature search was performed on articles before December 2017 to identify the literature that has evaluated graft maturation on second-look arthroscopy following ACL reconstruction. Only studies using human grafts, evaluating graft maturation with two or more gross findings were included. Study design, grafts, surgical techniques, follow-up period, evaluation parameters, and categories were compiled.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight studies were included in this study. All studies evaluated graft maturation with two or more of the following three findings: graft integrity, tension, and synovial coverage. Two to four categories were used for evaluating each parameter, but the criteria for classification were slightly different for each study. Several studies reported neo-vascularization of grafts and the total maturation score by summing up the scores assigned to each evaluation parameter. Three studies reported that there was no correlation between second-look findings and patient-reported outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Graft integrity, tension, and synovial coverage were the most frequently evaluated for graft maturation on second-look arthroscopy. However, there is no uniform criterion for evaluation. Therefore, development of a valid, uinform criterion is required.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, systematic review of level I-IV investigations.

摘要

目的

本系统评价旨在调查并总结前交叉韧带(ACL)重建术后二次关节镜检查时移植物成熟度的评估方法。

方法

对2017年12月之前的文章进行文献检索,以确定评估ACL重建术后二次关节镜检查时移植物成熟度的文献。仅纳入使用人体移植物、通过两项或更多大体检查结果评估移植物成熟度的研究。整理研究设计、移植物、手术技术、随访期、评估参数和类别。

结果

本研究纳入了28项研究。所有研究均通过以下三项检查结果中的两项或更多来评估移植物成熟度:移植物完整性、张力和滑膜覆盖情况。每个参数使用两到四个类别进行评估,但每项研究的分类标准略有不同。几项研究报告了移植物的新生血管形成情况以及通过对每个评估参数的得分求和得出的总成熟度评分。三项研究报告二次关节镜检查结果与患者报告的结局之间无相关性。

结论

在二次关节镜检查时,移植物完整性、张力和滑膜覆盖情况是评估移植物成熟度最常采用的指标。然而,目前尚无统一的评估标准。因此,需要制定一个有效的统一标准。

证据级别

IV级,I-IV级研究的系统评价。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/48aa/7219533/17f9f082f715/43019_2019_5_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验