Suppr超能文献

十年后随访时发现夹层陶瓷衬里骨折。

Fractures of a sandwich ceramic liner at ten year follow-up.

机构信息

Hospices Civils de Lyon, Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud, Chirurgie Orthopédique, Traumatologique et Médecine du Sport, Lyon, France.

出版信息

Int Orthop. 2012 May;36(5):955-60. doi: 10.1007/s00264-011-1375-7. Epub 2011 Oct 20.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to understand the causes of sandwich liner fractures implanted at our institution by evaluating the long-term results of this device.

METHODS

We retrospectively assessed 143 patients (151 hips) consecutively operated upon in our department by the same senior surgeon between 1999 and 2001 and with a mean follow-up period of 9.9 years (range 8.5-11.5). The components used were Cerasul® sandwich ceramic liners within a cementless cup. Patient assessment was based on demographic factors (age, gender, body mass index), the clinical scores according to Devane (activity), the potential complications and a radiographic analysis from an anteroposterior pelvic radiograph (cup inclination). Revision cases and their cause were classified (implant fracture, loosening, dislocation, periprosthetic fracture).

RESULTS

Five cases of liner fracture (3.7%) were observed at a mean seven year (4.5-8.5) follow-up. The risk factor for implant failure was found to be patient activity: the mean preoperative Devane score was 3.5 in the fracture group vs 2.6 in the control group (p = 0.008). Mean cup inclination was 52°. The survivorship analysis at ten years was 85% with revision as the endpoint. Prosthetic complications accounted for 8.6% of all 151 hips (fractures included): one case of aseptic loosening (0.7%), two cases of sepsis (1.4%), four cases of isolated dislocation (2.8%) and one case of recurrent dislocation (0.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

Alumina sandwich liners remain a subject of concern since the increasing clinical follow-up period may predispose them to fatigue failure. This system has been abandoned in our department since 2005.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在通过评估该装置的长期结果来了解在我院植入的三明治衬垫骨折的原因。

方法

我们回顾性评估了 1999 年至 2001 年期间由同一位资深外科医生在我院连续手术的 143 例患者(151 髋),平均随访时间为 9.9 年(8.5-11.5 年)。使用的组件是无水泥杯内的 Cerasul® 三明治陶瓷衬垫。患者评估基于人口统计学因素(年龄、性别、体重指数)、根据 Devane(活动)的临床评分、潜在并发症以及前后骨盆射线照片(杯倾斜)的放射学分析。翻修病例及其原因分类为(植入物骨折、松动、脱位、假体周围骨折)。

结果

在平均 7 年(4.5-8.5 年)的随访中,观察到 5 例(3.7%)衬垫骨折。发现植入物失败的风险因素是患者活动度:骨折组的平均术前 Devane 评分为 3.5,对照组为 2.6(p=0.008)。平均杯倾斜度为 52°。以翻修为终点的 10 年生存率分析为 85%。所有 151 髋假体并发症占 8.6%(包括骨折):无菌性松动 1 例(0.7%),感染 2 例(1.4%),单纯脱位 4 例(2.8%),再脱位 1 例(0.7%)。

结论

氧化铝三明治衬垫仍然是一个关注的问题,因为随着临床随访时间的延长,它们可能容易发生疲劳失效。自 2005 年以来,该系统已在我院停用。

相似文献

1
Fractures of a sandwich ceramic liner at ten year follow-up.十年后随访时发现夹层陶瓷衬里骨折。
Int Orthop. 2012 May;36(5):955-60. doi: 10.1007/s00264-011-1375-7. Epub 2011 Oct 20.

引用本文的文献

5
Ceramic-on-ceramic bearings total hip arthroplasty in young patients.年轻患者的陶瓷对陶瓷轴承全髋关节置换术
Arthroplast Today. 2016 Aug 25;2(4):205-209. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2016.04.004. eCollection 2016 Dec.
9
Experience with sandwich liner and its high rate of failure.三明治衬垫的使用经验及其高失败率。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2015 Feb;25(2):233-42. doi: 10.1007/s00590-014-1503-3. Epub 2014 Jul 16.

本文引用的文献

4
Extremely high fracture rate of a modular acetabular component with a sandwich polyethylene ceramic insertion for THA: a preliminary report.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2009 Sep;129(9):1145-50. doi: 10.1007/s00402-008-0662-2. Epub 2008 Jun 21.
6
Fracture of a ceramic liner in a total hip arthroplasty with a sandwich cup.采用三明治杯的全髋关节置换术中陶瓷内衬骨折
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2008 Aug;128(8):783-5. doi: 10.1007/s00402-007-0536-z. Epub 2007 Dec 8.
7
Failure mechanisms of ceramic total hip arthroplasty.陶瓷全髋关节置换术的失效机制。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 May;89(5):1131-2; author reply 1132-3. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200705000-00030.
9
Failure analysis of a ceramic bearing acetabular component.陶瓷轴承髋臼部件的失效分析
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Feb;89(2):367-75. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00148.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验