• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

婚姻状况、居住安排和死亡率:这种关联是否因性别而异?

Marital status, living arrangement and mortality: does the association vary by gender?

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, associated Institute of University of Basel, Switzerland, Socinstrasse 57, 4051 Basel, Switzerland.

出版信息

J Epidemiol Community Health. 2012 Jul;66(7):e22. doi: 10.1136/jech.2010.128397. Epub 2011 Oct 19.

DOI:10.1136/jech.2010.128397
PMID:22012962
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Men appear to benefit more from being married than women with respect to mortality in middle age. However, there is some uncertainty about gender differences in mortality risks in older individuals, widowed, divorced and single individuals and about the impact of living arrangements.

METHODS

Longitudinal data with 1990 census records being linked to mortality data up to 2005 were used (Swiss National Cohort). The sample comprised all residents over age 44 years in Switzerland (n=2,440,242). All-cause mortality HRs for marital status and living arrangements were estimated by Cox regression for men and women and different age groups with adjustment for education and socio-professional category.

RESULTS

The benefit of being married was stronger for men than for women; however, mortality patterns were similar, with higher mortality in divorced and single individuals compared with widowed individuals (<80 years). After adjustment for living arrangements, the gender difference by marital status disappeared. Stratification by living arrangement revealed that mortality risks were highest for 45-64-year-old divorced (HR 1.72 (95% CI 1.67 to 1.76)) and single men (HR 1.67 (95% CI 1.63 to 1.71)) who lived alone. In women of the same age, the highest mortality risk was observed for those who were single and living with a partner (HR 1.70 (95% CI 1.58 to 1.82)). In older age groups, the impact of marital status decreased.

CONCLUSIONS

Evaluation of living arrangements is crucial for identifying and explaining gender differences in mortality risks by marital status. The impact of living alone and living with a partner seems to be different in men and women.

摘要

背景

男性在中年时期的死亡率似乎比女性更受益于婚姻。然而,对于老年人、丧偶、离婚和单身个体的死亡率风险以及生活安排的影响,存在一些不确定性。

方法

使用纵向数据将 1990 年人口普查记录与 2005 年之前的死亡率数据进行链接(瑞士国家队列)。样本包括瑞士所有 44 岁以上的居民(n=2,440,242)。对男性和女性以及不同年龄组的所有原因死亡率 HRs,通过 Cox 回归进行了婚姻状况和生活安排的估计,并调整了教育和社会职业类别。

结果

与女性相比,男性的婚姻益处更强;然而,死亡率模式相似,与丧偶者相比,离婚和单身个体的死亡率更高(<80 岁)。在调整生活安排后,婚姻状况的性别差异消失。按生活安排分层显示,45-64 岁独居的离婚(HR 1.72(95%CI 1.67 至 1.76))和单身男性(HR 1.67(95%CI 1.63 至 1.71))的死亡率风险最高。在同一年龄的女性中,单身且与伴侣同住的女性的死亡率风险最高(HR 1.70(95%CI 1.58 至 1.82))。在年龄较大的年龄组中,婚姻状况的影响下降。

结论

评估生活安排对于确定和解释婚姻状况对死亡率风险的性别差异至关重要。独居和与伴侣同住的影响在男性和女性中似乎不同。

相似文献

1
Marital status, living arrangement and mortality: does the association vary by gender?婚姻状况、居住安排和死亡率:这种关联是否因性别而异?
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2012 Jul;66(7):e22. doi: 10.1136/jech.2010.128397. Epub 2011 Oct 19.
2
Marital and cohabitation status as predictors of mortality: a 10-year follow-up of an Italian elderly cohort.婚姻和同居状况作为死亡率的预测因素:对意大利老年队列的10年随访
Soc Sci Med. 2008 Nov;67(9):1456-64. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.06.026. Epub 2008 Jul 31.
3
Mortality differences according to living arrangements.根据居住安排的死亡率差异。
Int J Epidemiol. 2007 Dec;36(6):1255-64. doi: 10.1093/ije/dym212. Epub 2007 Oct 30.
4
Marriage, cohabitation and mortality in Denmark: national cohort study of 6.5 million persons followed for up to three decades (1982-2011).丹麦的婚姻、同居与死亡率:650 万人长达三十年(1982-2011)的全国队列研究。
Int J Epidemiol. 2013 Apr;42(2):559-78. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyt024. Epub 2013 Mar 11.
5
Marital status and colon cancer outcomes in US Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results registries: does marriage affect cancer survival by gender and stage?美国监测、流行病学和最终结果登记处的婚姻状况与结肠癌结局:婚姻是否通过性别和分期影响癌症生存?
Cancer Epidemiol. 2011 Oct;35(5):417-22. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2011.02.004. Epub 2011 Apr 5.
6
Marital status and mortality among Japanese men and women: the Japan Collaborative Cohort Study.日本男性和女性的婚姻状况与死亡率:日本协作队列研究
BMC Public Health. 2007 May 7;7:73. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-7-73.
7
Social inequalities in the association between partner/marital status and health among workers in Spain.西班牙劳动者中伴侣/婚姻状况与健康之间关联的社会不平等。
Soc Sci Med. 2011 Feb;72(4):600-7. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.11.035. Epub 2010 Dec 15.
8
Marital history from age 15 to 40 years and subsequent 10-year mortality: a longitudinal study of Danish males born in 1953.15至40岁的婚姻史与随后10年的死亡率:对1953年出生的丹麦男性的纵向研究。
Int J Epidemiol. 2004 Apr;33(2):389-97. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyh065.
9
Marital status, intergenerational co-residence and cardiovascular and all-cause mortality among middle-aged and older men and women during wartime in Beirut: gains and liabilities.战时黎巴嫩中年及老年男性和女性的婚姻状况、代际共同居住情况与心血管疾病及全因死亡率:利弊分析
Soc Sci Med. 2007 Jan;64(1):64-76. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.08.006. Epub 2006 Oct 6.
10
Living arrangements as determinants of myocardial infarction incidence and survival: A prospective register study of over 300,000 Finnish men and women.居住安排作为心肌梗死发病率和生存率的决定因素:一项对30多万芬兰男性和女性的前瞻性登记研究。
Soc Sci Med. 2015 May;133:93-100. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.03.054. Epub 2015 Mar 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Cohabitation and Mortality Across the Life Course: A Longitudinal Cohort Study with Swedish Register-Based Sibling Comparisons.生命历程中的同居与死亡率:一项基于瑞典登记数据的同胞比较纵向队列研究
Eur J Popul. 2025 Jan 14;41(1):2. doi: 10.1007/s10680-024-09722-6.
2
Daily relationship satisfaction and markers of health: Findings from a smartphone-based assessment.日常关系满意度与健康指标:基于智能手机评估的结果
Appl Psychol Health Well Being. 2025 Feb 25;17(1):e12627. doi: 10.1111/aphw.12627. Epub 2024 Nov 15.
3
Gender and age variations in the association between multigenerational cohabitation and self-rated health among middle-aged and older adults in Japan.
日本中老年人多代同居与自评健康之间的关联存在性别和年龄差异。
Nagoya J Med Sci. 2024 May;86(2):262-279. doi: 10.18999/nagjms.86.2.262.
4
Six-year mortality associated with living alone and loneliness in Swedish men and women born in 1930.1930 年出生的瑞典男性和女性独居和孤独与六年死亡率的关系。
BMC Geriatr. 2023 Dec 1;23(1):793. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-04503-y.
5
Socially bonded females face more sexual coercion in a female-philopatric primate.在雌性留居的灵长类动物中,建立了社会联系的雌性面临更多的性胁迫。
iScience. 2023 Sep 9;26(10):107358. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.107358. eCollection 2023 Oct 20.
6
Association of living arrangements with all-cause mortality among older adults: a propensity score-matched cohort study.居住安排与老年人全因死亡率的关联:倾向评分匹配队列研究。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Sep 19;23(1):1821. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16749-7.
7
Gender Differences in Migrant Workers Health in China.中国农民工健康的性别差异。
Int J Public Health. 2023 Aug 14;68:1605018. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2023.1605018. eCollection 2023.
8
Union Status and Disability Pension.工会会员身份与残疾抚恤金。
Eur J Popul. 2023 Jul 4;39(1):21. doi: 10.1007/s10680-023-09670-7.
9
Gender differences in the modifying effect of living arrangements on the association of sleep quality with cognitive function among community-dwelling older adults: a cross-sectional study.社区老年人中居住安排对睡眠质量与认知功能关联的调节作用的性别差异:一项横断面研究。
Front Public Health. 2023 May 5;11:1142362. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1142362. eCollection 2023.
10
Marital Status, Living Arrangements and Mortality at Older Ages in Chile, 2004-2016.智利 2004-2016 年婚姻状况、居住安排和老年人死亡率。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 22;19(21):13733. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192113733.