Hoey John
Queen's University, Kingston Ontario, Canada.
Mens Sana Monogr. 2008 Jan;6(1):226-36. doi: 10.4103/0973-1229.40568.
Editorial independence is crucial for the intellectual life of a scientific journal. A journal exists only as an idea created by authors and readers, with some editorial orchestration. Editorial independence can be compromised by pressure put on editors by their owners-whether commercial publishers or professional organizations. Both types of owners rely heavily on income from paid advertising in their print journals. Yet, the massive expansion of journal readership that has resulted due to the development of the Web has effected a marked shift in the readership of the journal, both geographically and intellectually, producing a new community of users who see only electronic versions of the journal. Commercial pressures on owners to satisfy the interests of the (mainly national and professional) print readership conflict with the editorial independence needed to respond to the vast Web constituency. This is a major source for compromise of editorial independence. Reduction of commercial pressures by transferring editorial costs to authors and by other cost-reducing models are discussed in this article.
编辑独立性对于科学期刊的学术生命至关重要。期刊仅作为作者和读者在一定编辑编排下创造的一种理念而存在。编辑独立性可能会受到所有者(无论是商业出版商还是专业组织)施加给编辑的压力的损害。这两类所有者都严重依赖其纸质期刊的付费广告收入。然而,由于网络的发展导致期刊读者群大幅扩张,这在地理和学术层面上都使期刊的读者群发生了显著转变,产生了一个只看期刊电子版的新用户群体。所有者满足(主要是国内和专业的)纸质读者群利益的商业压力,与回应庞大网络读者群体所需的编辑独立性相冲突。这是编辑独立性受损的一个主要根源。本文讨论了通过将编辑成本转嫁给作者以及采用其他成本削减模式来减轻商业压力的问题。